JMM

Brandon Beane is that you? 😆😆

You might want to as they say " do your research ", as to the possible teams that were interested and compensation that was discussed. Hint: it's right on this board. But again thanks for playing there are several nice parting gifts for you. Bye bye now👋

I didn't think you could. But hey, hypotheticals, they be real complicated huh? Thanks for playing though.

My my defensive aren't we? Why would that be? 🤔 Let's see if you can keep up. You believe that BB told the truth. Fair enough. Let's say he DIDN'T (SHOCKING), what would be the reasons for that? Explain and elaborate what purpose he would have to do so. Hmm, perhaps you want to ask yourself why you are so engaged in trying to prove me wrong? Is it an " insane obsession "? You sure are in hook line and sinker fella. Hmm...🤔🤔

Oh now now, you can't use non linear thinking and logic here pal, that just confuses and upsets people. If BB said they didn't trade him, then that's the absolute truth and is not to be challenged. Fall in line fella..🙄🙄🙄

Did you listen to the entire presser? I did. I heard a lot of GMSPEAK. Did you expect him to say " yea we looked into trading him but it didn't work out ". Hmm? Do people lie? Sometimes for good reasons? If Beane said today that he believed Santa is real would you believe him. The naivete at times on this board is simply amazing. They did their due diligence and didn't come to terms they liked. If they did he'd be gone. Period.

🤣🤣🤣🤣 , oh i DO want to talk to u about that bridge in Brooklyn, I have it on sale right now. You can't be this naive, CAN YOU? Let me help u out. BB engaged in some terrific GMSPEAK today. As a public service I will translate it to English. Ready? First a disclaimer for you: The following is OPINION. BB: We're not giving up on him now.. Translation: We did our due diligence and looked into trading him, but either due to lack or interest or not agreeing on compensation we didn't get er done. Now we're stuck with him till season end. BB: Having said that you have to be ready to play.. Translation: This is not a physical issue with him, it's mental and/ or attitudinal. He simply is not doing what he needs to as a professional for our standards. BB: BTW he has a nagging ankle injury( despite being a healthy scratch less than one week ago, and when asked after the game McDermott said NOTHING about an injury , just that 36 yr old Norman gives us a better chance to win right now), so we may place him on IR to get well... Translation: We are going to get this guy out of McDermott and the rest of the staffs hair, they have had it. BB : whether it's the minimum 4 weeks, 5, whatever it takes.. Translation: We aren't activating this guy the rest of the season unless it's an absolute emergency. There you go. You're welcome. Now about that bridge....

That's OBVIOUS now. 😆 Yup for now on , for the more concrete members, you need to preface every post with IN MY OPINION, otherwise the "truth" squad hits you and hard! " He made a assumption! Let's get em! " 😄

Aww what a clever lil response. You truly are a " warrior". A keyboard one. Now how shall I respond to your question? Hmm, let me try to place myself back in the mindset of a boy in 6th grade...nope. Ya got me " warrior". 🤣🤣 Well you enjoy your bliss.

In my OPINION they tried to trade him. In my OPINION, I think it was obvious. Now what is your OPINION? Did Beane attempt to shop him, explore a trade? If your answer is no, then I have a nice bridge in NYC for sale I want to talk to u about. Beane is an excellent GM. If he didn't look into a move for him based on what we have seen especially this year, then he wouldn't be doing his job. He did his job.

Hmm, let's see I posted an OPINION, on a message board. How OUTRAGEOUS! I mean if we dont speak on known 100% facts, then possibly the internet police should come for me. Shudder...Now let's see, local pundits that cover the team for a living stated this was likely. National pundits also suggested it, many on this board did as well. But hey , what do they know? Good enough? Remember though , from now on, nobody on this OPINION board is allowed to state ONE, they can only comment on KNOWN FACT. Assumption is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Right?

Is it an assumption? Yes. Is it based on lots of good information and logical inferences? Yes. Now, you want to comment on the actual question of the post, or just be a foolish troll?

Obviously the Bills tried to trade him. Possibly they never got a good offer, but it's just as likely no other team was really interested. Which again confirms to me my opinion, which is that the issues with him go well beyond physical and his " fit" in our scheme. So now what? Inactive the rest of the year? Try to give him one more chance? Most likely he gets traded again after the season.

This guy is a perfect fit for our scheme and a ball hawk. He's going to thrive, cost us basically nothing since we will get another third for Edmunds next year. GREAT MOVE.

I lol at the part where he tells the rook to come with him to celebrate the TD, then watches him and Morse and just kind of walks away...😁

No downside here. He's still likely a viable short yardage back. Not costing us any assets and probably gonna be vet min. Decent move.

You mean he played to lose. I agree wholeheartedly and he almost pulled it off.

THIS!

A good team dominates that game. They put their foot down and stomp that team. Tampa is a 6 win team. They nearly won. This is not the team of the last few years. This team is a 9 win team.

Folks I don't mince words here. Yes a wins a win, blah blah. That team loses to at least 10 teams tonight, at least 15 if on the road. This is NOT a good team right now. Prove me wrong

Folks, this is NOT a good team. Period.

It's early but he looks so stiff, no explosiveness, but more importantly no first step and bend. Without that, he's just an undersized end. Very worrisome

Don't forget the uptempo!

Middle D is just a sieve now. Sigh...shame. Not much you can do.

You don't throw that, he saw Winfield. Or you put loft on it. Inexcusable.