Billz4ever

Yep, we added some good WR depth, but I don't see any of those guys as difference makers that take some of the attention off Diggs. DHop completely changes how a defense has to scheme against us in coverage.

We took him at #9 and at the time, he was actually rated at a high first round pick. If 4 drafts later, the Bears would voluntarily give up the #9 pick to get him after seeing his production since being drafted, they should start mandatory drug testing of GMs.

Considering the Cooks trade was for a 2023 5th round and a 2024 6th round, AZ is crazy if they think they are going to get anything better than a 3rd at best for him. Especially if what's being reported is true that basically no other teams are interested any longer besides us.

And considering Josh is throwing on the run quite often, the throw might not be exactly pinpoint accurate every time. Get the ball in the vicinity of the receiver and allow a receiver with the hands of someone like DHop to make a play on the ball.

Poona Ford. Seattle DT.

If we can get him for that, great. I think we would have to move Ed to be able to do both though.

I'm fine with drafting a Campbell and starting him this year. We can't afford high priced free agents to fill every hole. We need to use the draft and get guys on rookie deals. DHop immediately helps the Bills win now, while Campbell will be cheap and hold down that spot for years to come.

While certainly true, you never really know that at the time as far as what they will turn into. While I prefer to also draft a WR (not preferrably in the first round) the Bills are in the win now mode and adding DHop instantly makes our WR corp one of the best in football.

Not if you're on Twitter it's not. It's still as hot as ever. I would say even hotter today than yesterday.

Randy Moss was really the only WR I can remember that went there and put up good numbers.

Yeah, and keeping DHop off KC's roster is just a giant bonus. As has already been said, the roof of TBD would be on fire if the Chiefs picked him up. Kelce and DHop? Yuck.

Yeah, we might actually owe JJ a thank you if Beane can pull this off. Prior to Cooks signing and what it cost Dallas, I don't think there's really any way we would've been interested given AZ's asking price.

Only a week? Lol It will be Armageddon here at least until training camp.

I don't want to give up Shakir. DHop is the win now and Shakir is the future. I'd honestly be more willing to give them Davis at this point since he's going into the final year of his rookie contract and add another rookie in the draft that can learn from DHop and Diggs.

So, if Beane lets you be the GM, you'll like him again? LMAO

Rodgers won the Super Bowl, Super Bowl MVP, and his first league MVP without Adams.

I haven't seen that anywhere. Rumors, but we've seem 1000 rumors about him, DHop, Henry, etc.

If cable is already significantly more expensive, that doesn't make sense because cable has raised rates even more and has more tacked on fees, so YouTube TV should still be a much better bargain for the foreseeable future.

It's looking like YouTube TV subscribers will get a discount on it, which will be an incentive for people to sign up.

You have to look at the taxes and fees these companies charge you above and beyond what they tell you your plan costs. My most recent Youtube TV bill, the taxes were $5.38. My last cable bill before dropping cable, there's a broadcast TV fee, which was $19.35, an Regional Sports fee, which was $9.10, and finally tax, which was another $10.25 and I had no additional boxes, which they charge you like another $10 bucks each/month. So that's another almost $40 bucks/month on top of what they tell you your plan costs. Ridiculous. With YouTube TV, you're just paying the tax.

Have you tried a VPN as a workaround?

The funniest part is that he wants to act like the cable companies aren't also raising their rates all the time too, so even if YouTube TV does periodically, the cable companies are still going to be more expensive regardless.

Oh, you mean like cable already does their cable boxes and each additional one you need? With the base plan, YouTube TV give you 3 concurrent streams. That would cost you like $30 bucks extra on cable with paying for boxes. Espn+ and Disney+ aren't free for cable subscribers either, so I don't know why you're trying to make it sound like those fees apply to only cord cutters. And I would love to for you to provide a cable service that's currently cheaper than YouTube TV and has a comparable number of channels. Not to mention, like there's an extra $20 bucks tacked onto your cable bill in taxes and fees that aren't even metioned in what they tell you cable package costs. If your package is $100 bucks, what you're really paying is close to $120 to $125 with all the fees. Not to mention you get YouTube music included with that.

We have a brutal schedule next season, so 13 wins is going to be very hard to duplicate again in the first place.

Cincy owned us in the trenches on both sides of the ball and it showed. We couldn't get to Burrow or stop the run and Josh was repeatedly running for his life to escape the sack. In a nutshell, that was what decided the game and if we don't adequately address that this offseason, they will do it to us again.