Billz4ever

You have no way of knowing that.

Teams like that typically tend to fall into the dangerous category in my experience. They will beat teams throughout the year they weren't supposed to.

I'm not saying I don't think we won't beat them. All I'm saying is I don't think neither the team nor the fans should underestimate them.

Not sure it's as easy as we initially thought. Both the Pats and Jets have exceeded expectations by a lot up to this point.

Oh, well. Nothing we can do to stop it if that's the case except play football better than they do. The Chiefs lack a receiver that can stretch the field. CMC doesn't fix that for them.

If the Chiefs are willing to give up first round picks for CMC, good, let them. It will only hurt them in the long run.

Moore has huge money due next year.

But if you had the option wouldn't you like to have an enclosed stadium where weather isn't a factor for either team and you can just enjoy the game without freezing?

Now you're claiming QB'S like Marino couldn't make those throws? LMAO How many times did Brady play in Buffalo in the winter and beat us? Brady beat us 15 consecutive times. That's the equivalent of 7 and 1/2 seasons straight. How much do you think the Buffalo weather affected him? You mean the game where Mac Jones beat us in the wind? LMAO

How do you know that was the reason? That's you making an assumption. Looked to me like the safety took a bad angle. And using your same logic, at the end of the quarter, whether is now advantage Pit. It's a dumb argument since both teams play in it. You brought up Justin Tucker missing. That is you literally implying the Bills kicker would've made the kick that Tucker missed. If both Kickers have to deal with it then it's not an advantage for the Bills, brainiac. You're hopeless.

So you're crackpot theory says that Justin Tucker missed, but if it was the Bills kicker they would've made both? LMAO That would have to be your argument for the weather to be an advantage to the Bills. Do you even know how ridiculous you sound right now?

If you could, you'd have clearly done it by now. Fact is you can't. Period. You're really reaching now LMAO. Kickers? Hate to break it to you, but both Kickers would have to deal with the wind, so that's an utterly ridiculous attempt at trying to prove your stupid theory. On top of that, you really think Justin Tucker has never had to deal with wind before? LMAO And the fact he missed, that automatically means it was the wind, right? 😂😂🤣

Still no examples. Crackpot theory. I rest my case. This isn't Miami where one sideline is shades while the visitors bake and it's 30 degrees warmer. Imagine being so sure of something and arguing it over and over, yet you can't provide a single example of it. Not to mention, it shows a clear lack of faith in the talent of the team you claim to support if you want the weather to "hurt the other team". (But can't provide any examples of where that actually happened). Wait, you're claiming that was because of the wind and not Josh's skill? FYI, teams switch endzones at the end of each quarter, so one team never benefits from the wind the entire game. Josh can make that throw all day.

If that's not an admission you have no faith in your team I don't know what is and considering every super bowl is played in a location where the weather is not expected to be a factor, the Bills will have to be on an equal playing field as far as weather goes, which is unfortunate for you I guess.

You've been asked multiple time to provide examples of games where the weather directly contributed to us wining and being a detriment to the other team. You have yet to do it. That speaks for itself.

So once again, you have no faith in the talent of our team. You need mother nature to influence the outcome. How insulting. And besides that, it's a crackpot theory. You've been asked multiple times to provide examples of where the weather was the reason why we won and how it was an advantage to us. Unless I've missed it, you've still never done it.

Then you have no concept of economic development. Too cold for people yet they had the SB in Minneapolis, where it gets colder than Buffalo. And like I said, sounds like your goal here is simply to try and poo poo the idea rather than contribute anything constructive.

Why is that? It's a model that has been repeated proven all over the country for years, not just for Domes/retractable roofs. Large indoor venues in general.

And if Buffalo had a venue like this that could host events year round, Hotel chains would be falling all over themselves to build around it. This is already a well-established economic development model. And that article is now a decade old. Pretty sure that number for Buffalo has increased by itself anyway.

That makes no sense considering Josh on average attempts way more passes than Lamar does in the first place. Lamar only played in 12 games last year, so I'll use 2020 instead. Lamar had 382 attempts on the season. Josh had 572...nearly 200 more attempts. You've drawn conclusions not supported by the actual situation. That literally makes the case for a dome/retractable roof because then the State and County are getting more use out of it then rather than just sinking hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into an open air football stadium.

You said it was too cold, dude. I'm just going to disregard everything else after that since it was such a ridiculous comment. But you apparently also do not understand that if Buffalo were to have a venue like that, which could host events year-round, hotel chains would literally be falling all over themselves to build hotels around it.

Why do people keep saying this? This is a nonsensical argument. If Buffalo had a venue like that, which could host events year-round, more hotels would be built around it.

The state and the county are kicking in a combined $850M already. If the Pegula's wanted one, they could make it happen. Terry Pegula has a net worth of $6.7B.

This time? No, I don't believe so.

No, it's an open air stadium. There will be some protection from the elements with overhangs, but not like a dome or retractable roof.