Billz4ever

Rhodes barely jogging after him.

From your mouth to God's ears. Cheers.

What? LOL. He repeatedly got used and abused by Detroit. It was not pretty.

You don't want your franchise player having to scramble every play and it's just a statistical fact that a QB is less accurate when having to throw on the run. The line is indeed a huge problem since Josh can't go through his normal progression and is having to improvise on the run. Those are not high percentage plays and are quite often plays that lead to Josh trying to do too much. Nevermind they suck at run blocking too.

Our pass rush struggles have been going on for many more games than just since those 2 were injured. And Espensa? Really?

Our pass rush hasn't been great as of late even with Von. Frazier is having to blitz more to get good pressure lately, which I'm glad he realizes since letting meh QBs pick our weak secondary apart has become beyond frustrating.

Tom Brady had a line that could protect him and give him time. If Brady had our line, he'd be on his back most of every game and would probably be out for the season at this point since he's nowhere near as mobile as Josh.

I even heard Beast Mode was open to coming back to the Bills.

Was never a fan of Crowder. Didn't think he was that great in Wash or NY and never saw what the front office saw in him bringing him here.

LMAO, you're the one that tried using guy's stats on an active roster to compare to Beasley after I point out the guys that are actually playing and aren't named Diggs aren't exactly tearing it up. They are, in fact, underperforming expectations. They'd BETTER have better stats than Beasley. 😂

The Bucs kept reverting him to the practice squad after games and was only eligible for one more elevation from the practice squad when he decided he was done.

LMAO, of course they have better stats than Beasley, they've been on an active roster all season. And then you claim that's all he was able to produce? LOL, he literally played NINE snaps all game against GB. But yes, that's all on him. ROFL I think you're making it up as you go. Most people know how to separate football and politics. You should try it sometime. Weird how whatever his political belief are weren't a distraction before, eh?

LMAO, you act like our own receivers, not named Diggs and who are younger, are tearing it up out there. What's their excuse? Do you have video of his other catches or are you just making it up as you go? Not to mention, TB has looked downright terrible at times this season, but great job throwing that at the feet of the receiver that just got there.

He was the vet presence on the field that had the ability to find the hole in the zone and find the opening for Josh to get him the ball. It didn't require going deep and coming back. And "multiple times"? He only played 2 games for TB. Had 4 catches on 5 targets. His first catch was for 1st down on a 4th down conversion, so your "multiple times" is literally based on 3 catches.

Tampa is a completely different offense though and Brady is strictly a pocket passer. Beas was the guy here who had the knack of getting open when Josh left the pocket...something our other receivers not named Diggs seem to have a problem doing on anywhere near a consistent basis.

Beasley was always that guy that could get open when we needed the 1st. Something some of our other receivers (Ahem...Davis) seem to have trouble doing consistently. I really thought Shakir would take over that Beasley role, but the coaches obviously don't think so at this point.

I simply don't see the Bills running the routes that they had success with Beasley...those quick slants, short to mid-crossers, etc. Just don't see it with Dorsey.

Like Cook? I think Cook has already proven he's more than capable of playing at this level.

The FBI should've investigated, and they did investigate, except even long after they knew there was nothing there, they then lied to the FISA Court to extend the surveillance warrant and altered an email to make it look like Carter Page was interacting with the Russians on his own rather than acting as a CIA operational contact. https://nypost.com/2020/08/19/ex-fbi-lawyer-pleads-guilty-to-falsifying-documents-in-russia-probe/ They relied heavily on the Steele Dossier and Andy McCabe is on record that without the Dossier, there would've been no warrant. https://nypost.com/2020/11/10/mccabe-admits-he-wouldnt-have-signed-off-on-carter-page-warrant/ And then after the FBI investigated it, we had a 2+year special counsel investigate it and they reached the same conclusion the FBI did, which was there was nothing illegal. It was all for show and they ruined people's lives over it.

Conspiracy is a charge, and they couldn't prove that either. The excerpts I posted show there was no evidence and there was no link established. No matter what words you want to use, they had no case. A loose connection with Russians isn't proof of anything. Trump was a businessman. Of course he had interaction with Russians. There was no evidence of anything nefarious. You saying "it wasn't a clear violation of the law" is an admission that there was no actual crime committed and they could never prove it in a court of law. This entire thing is a giant exercise in semantics. If the report itself showed, no "collusion", "conspiracy", "coordination", "agreement" or anything of the sort, where's the crime? It's like people are claiming all those things happened, even though there's no evidence of any of it, and want history to ultimately reflect there was simply to keep the (false) narrative alive.

Utter nonsense. These are excerpts directly from the Mueller report. If there was legit anything there, the DOJ could have been waiting to arrest Trump after the very second Biden was sworn in. Russia collusion was an invention of the Clinton campaign. https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/20/politics/hillary-clinton-robby-mook-fbi

It seems as though we've either gotten away with what was working early in the season, or we've become too predictable and teams have figured us out by studying film. I didn't think they switched up the entire playbook from when Dabs was here, so we should still have a lot of those plays as options. I think a lot of the struggles aren't necessarily problems with the plays themselves, but more a situation of when they're being called. Last drive before the half yesterday, they were running all sideline routes that Detroit was covering pretty well. The Bills were playing like they had no timeouts when they had 2. Middle of the field was there for the taking. Made absolutely no sense.

He will disappear for large amounts of time and when he does show himself, he's not making the catches he should be. Besides the drops, he's just not getting open either. He makes the big plays here and there, but I'll take the consistency of a Beasley-type receiver over the drop prone, sometimes big play guy any day. The lack of that Beasley-type WR is what this offense is missing. I thought Shakir was going to get a chance to be that guy, but the coaches don't want to play him much.

Outside of Jackson getting picked on repeatedly all game, the defense played pretty well given who we have out. The tackling was indeed sloppy, but I've seen worse. Make no mistake, the Lions have a good offense. People should be more upset how anemic the offense was in this game, but they scored enough to win and made some big plays when they were needed.

The mods could what? Ban people for having a different opinion? Here's a better idea...as long as they aren't breaking the rules, keep scrolling.