Einstein

I separated the Bengals game out. I said if you want to count the Bengals game, then it’s 0 snaps in 3 of the last 5. But if you don’t (and I don’t blame you for not counting it), then it’s still zero snaps in 2 of the last 4 AND 40~% or less snaps in every game since October. .

He has 0 snaps in 2 of the last 4 games and 40~% or less snaps in every game since October (last on the team). He also had 0 snaps in the first two Bengals drives, so you could technically say 3 of the last 5 games he has had no snaps. .

Bengals wouldn’t play KC until the AFCCG.

Good point.

I don’t think McD is punishing him over something that happened in practice presumably weeks ago. He hasn’t had over 40~% of the snaps since OCTOBER. He is the 78th rated CB according to PFF.

The fact that we have had such injuries and craziness with the DB’s and Elam STILL can’t get on the field much is what concerns me the most. You’d think they’d be turning to him just out of sheer necessity… but they aren’t.

Definitely need him back. Especially with Elam barely playing. Rough rookie year for him.

Chris Brown is going to continue to replace Murphy. Same with my brother-in-law. If they get TPA into you quickly then the damage can be very minimal.

Yep. Not ideal. Not because we’re not better than Miami. I just don’t like divisional games. Anything seems to happen in those.

That’s a great idea.

Could the numbers be misleading because there were 2 one seeds per conference for a long time? Or does the data show the same regardless?

There’s a 50% chance the game would be in Buffalo with my idea. There is a 100% chance we would be on the road with this idea:

I’d rather they just flip a coin to decide whether the game would be in Buffalo or KC.

I’m super impressed with how quickly they figured out what the problem was. The physicians mentioned that multiple times during the press conference today. Extremely quick recognition.

We can’t even get the safeties we trade for onto the field! Just kidding around, but yeah if he is still this slow next year, you gotta consider making the move.

NFL executives right now to Goodell trying to decide what to do with the seeding:

“Wallace wishes he would've turned his head around and noticed that safety Jordan Poyer was lined up so far back.” Definitely a shocker to think Wallace was saying Poyer was too deep.

It is. But there is truly no football subject that would cause me to insult an other human being. It’s just not worth it. I’d rather leave the discuss altogether than do that. Have a good day Teef!

Surprised to hear this. I would have assumed the Uber wouldn’t be able to get very close to the stadium.

Do you go around life insulting everyone you meet or just those you feel deserve to be insulted because they don’t agree with you? A disagreement about what happened during 13 Seconds and the typical insults that come from it.

sigh 🤦🏻‍♂️

Thanks for keeping us updated. An 8th team would be wild. That basically ensures Miami makes it.

Yeah, players never come outright and say it. They allude to it. It’s been this way since the dawn of the NFL. Actually, more like the last 20 years. Before that, players were a bit more forthcoming with criticism. If reading between the lines is making things up, then there is no point to this forum as most posts are “made up”. This current regime especially tells us nothing and it’s all coach speak. We have to read between the lines and look at tape to determine. And in this case the tape says a whole lot. This is the same fallacy you keep repeating. ”we don’t KNOW for sure” Someone should tell Cover1 and PFF to go out of business since the team didn’t specifically tell them that what they’re analyzing is right or wrong so they can’t know for 100% sure. I have posted numerous screenshots that paint a very clear picture with the same formation on 3 consecutive downs with a timeout in-between and no changes to Levi’s placement but you want to ignore that. It hasn’t gone unnoticed. And then in the exact same situation the following year the coaching staff COMPLETELY changes the defensive alignment. It is so obvious what happened. I average 0.84 positive rep points per post. You average 0.9 positive rep points per post. Practically identical. As far as being argued with a lot, you probably have that perception because you are always looking to argue with me. You and a couple others on here like to pick on my posts but 99% of the rest of the forum doesn’t. And that fact is proven by my positive reputation according to the forum software (much more likes and agreement than dislikes). But because you feel the need to constantly seek out my post and argue with me over petty stuff, it has painted your perception of me negatively. But the stats don’t back up your views. .

Yes, he was saying if he saw Poyer line up deeper than he should have, then Wallace would have changed his alignment to fix Poyers mistake. That’s exactly what he was alluding to even if you don’t want to believe it. What I said above. Wallace is telling you should he have changed his alignment if he knew Poyer made the mistake of going too deep. This comment indicates to me that you didn’t actually read what I wrote, but instead just skimmed it. I didn’t post screen shots of how they should have aligned, I posted screenshots of how they DID align. On multiple plays. And even after a timeout where the coaches had the opportunity to fix Wallace’s alignment if they didn’t like it. That can happen, of course. But the reason we know it didn’t happen in this situation is because of 3 straight plays of the same alignment. If Wallace (or any other defender) was off, then they were off for 3 straight plays. And the Bills called a timeout and apparently didn’t feel like fixing it? We have the evidence! We have 3 straight plays of the same defensive lineup, with a timeout inbetween, and they never changed. The only player to change after the timeout was the CB opposite the field. The proof is there. In full color. I’ll go back to what I said before. In this years game, in nearly the exact same situation (12 seconds left and Chiefs looking to get a field goal before the half). The Bills coaching staff calls for press coverage across the board. No cushion. Did they change the way they defend the last second field goal because they called perfect coverage against the Chiefs last year and 1 player (Wallace) screwed it up? Or maybe, just maybe, did they play it completely different because Wallace was not to blame and it was a terrible coverage to be in at that moment? That’s a bit ironic considering you are constantly going around the board looking for “gotcha” moments. .