Jump to content

stevestojan

Community Member
  • Posts

    18,399
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stevestojan

  1. OBJ gets 99% of the credit for that TD. Without (yet another) one hand catch, that’s another punt.
  2. Unfortunately, the ones we REALLY need to abide by this "contract" won't read the thread, won't agree, or will simply just continue bashing him every time he throws an errant pass (or throws a completion that was "too low", or gets sacked, or smiles, or inhales, etc.)
  3. A 2nd and a 3rd? I’ll eat my shirt if we get that. A 3rd is most likely. Also. I feel bad for Shady. “We’re going to move you for a bit, win a quick Super Bowl, then bring you back when we’re sub .500 the next year. BUT, you’ll sneak your way into a playoff game in Buffalo. Cool?”
  4. I agree he is an upgrade. But my question remains on the “miscommunication” piece. This wasn’t like an RB running to the left when he was supposed to run to the right. I don’t understand how the holder is THE ONLY ONE who thinks it was a called fake? Like I mentioned in the game day thread, how does the holder interpret “hold the ball for a chip shot field goal like you always do” (which should take no communication, really) as “fake FG! Toss to... well, someone?” That’s like “different language” miscommunication. I don’t think after yesterday that name had any vagueness as to what we’d be talking about. Unless of course you’re talking about his moustahce.
  5. I have it screen capped but can’t post it here because the file size is too big? It’s just a screen cap on my iPhone.
  6. The table didn’t breakaway like it was supposed to when you jumped off the van, huh?
  7. No no they didn’t. The article (as of 4:44pm) still mentions a Bills loss.
  8. The Browns head coach has no idea how OT works.
  9. For those who lost the game, it’s on “fantasy zone” on Sunday ticket.
  10. Atlanta is 1-4. Wouldn’t have called that.
  11. They have actually changed the definition (or added a secondary one) of literally to mean just the opposite. This is likely because people misused it so much. But: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally : in effect : VIRTUALLY —used in an exaggerated way to emphasize a statement or description that is not literally true or possible
  12. The Browns going 1-2-2 would be the Brownsiest thing ever.
  13. Turns out it’s significantly easier to gain rushing yards when you’re given the ball.
  14. That is such basic football. How do you mess that up?
  15. Just a reminder that Miami started their game up 17-0.
  16. 1) Our defense is ridiculous. 2) Our punter was this close to having a wiener painted on his lawn. 3) I never had any doubt we’d pull off a win on that final drive.
  17. Well that’s a break we never get.
  18. So, how do you feel about Josh Allen?
  19. Shady and Ivory were just going nuts and Daboll decides to give Allen more shots?
  20. If that's the case, I change my comment of "Where is roughing the passer?" from a joke to demanding a full investigation of the NFL officiating team.
  21. Well, the good news is, we will make the national sporting news. Because of our idiot punter. I can't wait to hear the excuse/story on that one. Hilarious.
  22. EXACTLY. Was he short? Yes. Is that fair? No. Those two things DO NOT MATTER. In all the millions of dollars spent on running an NFL organization, does anyone look at stats? Anyone running some basic analytics? Regardless if a blind man could see he was short, someone needs to have the stats that there is a 0.1% chance of getting a spot call overturned.
×
×
  • Create New...