stevestojan
-
Posts
19,110 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by stevestojan
-
-
I was going to say maybe this is the year we hear Justin Shorter’s name for the first time. Then I googled and found out he’s not a bill anymore.
Have a kid at 44 years old they said. It will be fun they said.
-
2
-
-
5 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:
Andy Reid gives up 31.5 points per game in his last five playoff losses
And his defense has been a lot healthier in the playoffs than Sean mcdermotts
What's your excuse for him
The bills had 14 players on the injury report going into our conference championship game.. that's ridiculous
There's zero proof that we would have two rings without Sean McDermott.. that is your opinion my friend
I’m fine with you having your opinion. It just seems absolutely no one agrees with you by reading the replies. Doesn’t mean you’re wrong, but it sure does point in that direction.
Again, without Josh, he’s nothing. And don’t even give me the Andy Dalton led team that got us to the playoffs as a sign of Clappy’s ability to lead a non-Josh team to the playoffs. Plus that year our strength of schedule was basically negative.
You seem a bit over the top with your defense of a coach who is simply not good enough defensively to take the world’s best football player to the Super Bowl. It’s cool if your his brother or something but your passionate defense of him is a little odd.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
-
58 minutes ago, Buffalo716 said:
That's not true.. people literally have created their own statistics
Taking his last five losses.. and his points per game in those losses.. and then said his 33.2points per game allowed in his last five losses is the most in NFL history
But guess what that was also a lie cuz I looked at Mike McCarthy's last five playoff losses and it's worse
Cherry picking his losses you can take the last five playoff losses from every coach and they're all 27+ to 32 points per game
You could cherry pick any coaches last five playoff losses and no coach is allowing 22 points per game in a loss lol
it’s still really really really really bad for a “defensive minded” HC. So the stat is wrong and he’s only second or third worst in that category? Not anything to crow about. He’s the sole reason Josh doesn’t have at least two rings. -
3 minutes ago, Taro T said:
Don't know if they were destroyed or not. Do know the IAEA has said there is significant damage to at least 4 of the facilities. There is radiation eminating from at least 2 of them but radiation hasn't been detected beyond the perimeter of any of the facilities. And they did specifically state that one of the entrances to Fordam was hit and at least 2 strikes hit Natanz.
Don't know if the Fordam faciliy was destroyed, but do expect it is under a couple hundred feet of rubble in a worst case. So, it isn't exactly an easy get back if somehow the 12 - 30,000# bombs didn't penetrate all 300' that the facility was reported to have been originally underground.
And while we're all speculating whether or not the Iranians would've moved uranium after the Israelis first took out their air defenses, it is just as likely, possibly moreso that the Iranians moved uranium TO the Fordam site because it was believed to be inaccessible to the attacks rather than move uranium OUT of that seemingly (at least that was how it was described 3 days ago) unpenetrable facility.
But, considering pretty much all "intelligence reports" prior to the raids of these past 2 weeks said that there was no way to knock the Iranian defenses out this easily and that Iran would get support both from its benefactors and from the proxy groups it funds but except for the Yeminis firing a few missiles, NONE of that intelligence was correct; not sure just how reliable those same sources now claming that these strikes were unsuccessful actually are. They have a vested interest in these raids failing. Just like the Israelis and the US have a vested interest in them having succeeded.
And am going back to the old axiom, NEVER trust reports during the 1st 48 hours of ANY major event. They're almost always wrong.
But considering it is in America's and the world's best interests for the Iranian nuclear program to have been destroyed, will cautiously hope that the early reports stating that's the case happen to be the correct ones.
GREAT post. Thank you! Particularly liked the bolded part. Let’s hope Pete is right. And all the incoming reports are wrong. Truly.
-
1
-
-
He lucked into Allen.
There is nothing - in his scheme, his clock/game management, his decision making, or his “defensive mindset” that puts him in the top 20.
Without Allen, he’s out of a job 4 years ago.
-
2
-
1
-
10
-
3
-
1
-
3
-
-
3 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:
Honest question since I of course have no way of knowing what actually happened, nor do any of us here. But since many on the right are blasting any suggestion that the sites weren’t destroyed (by judging the website that posts the story) are you believing they did completely destroy them because Hegseth said they did? Or are you just waiting for more confirmation. Aljzerra is also reporting they have not been destroyed, along with other sources. So, aside from “CNN is biased” (no s.hit) what gives you confidence that the mission was indeed accomplished? -
Has anyone told these guys that cease means stop? No?
-
7 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
I didn’t call you weak, I didn’t call you a pus.sy, I didn’t call you anything at all and have no idea why you think I might. I told you what I thought about Trump’s comments directly, and provided examples of comments I thought were hateful. I didn’t “hate” Anderson Cooper before the silly comment by Trump, I don’t hate Anderson Cooper after Trump made the silly comment…in fact, I rarely think of him one way or the other and I think I’m probably in the majority.
I guess we just disagree, but it sure seems to me you’re the small-minded one in this conversation, seemingly wanting to position yourself as the arbiter of how everyone must feel.
I didn’t say YOU hate Anderson Cooper. I “know” you better than that - based on your posts here.
And I would say based on that I know you fully understand the difference between calling a person garbage versus calling a gay man by a female name; stop being ridiculous.
But the dozens (I stopped scrolling) of MAGAs (see: not all republicans) on Twitter currently asking what’s wrong with calling that “sodomite” or “f—“ by a female name is not made better by their “leader” calling him Allison. It’s beyond the norm that we’ve for some reason accepted of the ***** POTUS being a toddler. It’s crossed into hate. And his most extreme followers just love when their hate is seemingly justified by the highest office in the land.
That’s my point.
-
7 minutes ago, CoudyBills said:
That wasn't an attempt to burn you. That was life advice. Words aren't violence.
Life advice? Here’s some for you - grab a book; there is zero chance a well read grown adult would use the phrase “candyass” in 2025.
But I suppose if you’re ignorant enough to think a president’s words can’t incite violence, I shouldn’t be surprised. That’s quite possibly the top 10 dumbest things I’ve read on this board, and that speaks volumes. There are some great people on this board - both democrat and republican. You are just a walking meme.
-
1 hour ago, CoudyBills said:
Heinous? Don't be a candyass
Good one. -
2 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Deplorable. Irredeemable. Garbage.
These are words used as well, and there was no cattle call for resignation for the hateful language used. I’d have been perfectly ok without hearing this silliness from DJT about Andersen Cooper, it’s ridiculous and completely unnecessary. Still, selective outrage is n interesting thing.
To answer your question, I would consider deplorable/irredeemable/garbage terms about tens of millions of American voters heinous. It would be interesting to see if AC used the type of language you used here to call out Clinton/Biden, and of course compelled them to resign over that hate speech.
I’d say nice try, but it wasn’t. Calling a person garbage is not a hate term. Call me weak, call me a pus.sy, but Trump just keeps justifying the HATE towards homosexuals with stuff like this. Calling a person garbage is the same as calling them an a.sshole, a loser, a douchebag, etc.. It’s an insult. Having any 80 year old man call a gay man a female name is just hateful. Having the POTUS do it is hateful and just adds fuel to the fire of some of his base.
Oh but that’s right, MATA doesn’t hate ALL gays; just the burly men sneaking into every women’s bathroom in the country. 🙄It’s insane that you all will just group this in with “trump being Trump! Don’t take him seriously!”
Comparing an insult like calling MAGA garbage to calling a man by a female name because he is gay is an insanely weak argument.
Sugar coat it all you want. It is what it is. It’s gone beyond Trump being a gasbag orange blob (uh oh, was that hateful too??) to him just giving his filthy base (hate term!!) another reason to hate people for their sexuality. This isn’t a case of kids getting gender surgery. That, I agree, is wrong. This is the president of the United States calling a man a name solely because he is gay. And to answer another poster about, yes, it is indeed heinous.
-
To those just mocking the OP, don’t we think the orange blob has gone beyond just standard “oh, he’s a gasbag; we know this” and crossed a line of hate by calling an openly gay man (who you have no problem with, you just don’t like the TQIA part, right? 🙄) by a woman’s name? When do you stop excusing this heinous behavior by not condemning it? I know the messenger can be tiresome but it’s just another example of the POTUS feeding the hate of a good chunk of his electorate. Funny one, Donnie, you fat turd.
-
Can it collect unemployment?
-
1
-
-
19 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said:
I could have missed it but I never saw him mention Israel is any version of the retaliation comment. We will help Israel but attacking them is not same as attacking us.
Ya know what, you’re 100% correct. I just searched and he was specific to the US. I stand corrected. I truly hope Iran is not stupid enough to try it. But hope is one thing… and likely not paired with the reality of what will happen. Here’s to hoping I’m wrong. Apologies again for the misstatement. -
1 minute ago, Orlando Buffalo said:
You thought they would pause it now when their "honor" is on the line? They will do it at least one more day but then we can hope for some rational thought and peace. My only concern is they attack the US bases.
I did indeed think they might take a beat. But you’re right about the “honor” thing. I just know Trump said any retaliation would be met with the worst. I hope it’s just puffing of the chest and since it didn’t impact America directly, he “allows” this latest jab from Iran.
And if they do attack US bases, might as well get the marker out to redraw the map of the Middle East.
-
Just now, Orlando Buffalo said:
Iran has been firing missiles at Israel for a week now- why are you pretending it just started?
Come on man. Not at all what I said. But Trump said any retaliation would be met with (whatever version of huge he chose this time) retaliation. He didn’t say against America. He said against Israel or America. They waited less than 24 hours. I hope you’re right and he sees this as a continuation of the previous week - I truly do. I was just hoping (ignorantly, I know) that they would have taken a pause for a few days at least to not face what’s next… which is almost certainly more American involvement. -
Now Iran fires missies at Israel.
Regardless of what side you’re on in regards to trumps actions - and we’ve all made it clear where we individually stand on that- this is about as stupid and FAFO as you can get.
I mean most us knew they would not in any way just take that hit, cry uncle, and do nothing. But watching it play out exactly how we knew it would is still something to see.
Let’s just hope Trump doesn’t indeed show the destruction “like they’ve never seen” but I fear his own ego has cornered him into doing something stupid.
And now that we’ve supposedly accomplished the mission of denuclearization in Iran (starting to seem like it wasn’t the resounding victory drunken Pete delayed) let those two garbage governments kill each other by way of a trillion paper cuts.
But that won’t happen. So here we go again. Another forever war because Iran is doing exactly what we knew they would do. And if the reports that they moved the nuclear material before the strikes are true, we did it for… what?
Hillary would have done this. Bidens handlers might have. My feelings on this aren’t partisan. They are just feelings of a guy so sick of being the hall monitor to an area of the world that willfully chooses to never be stable.
-
1
-
-
-
For those choosing to not call a clear act of war “war,” what would you call it if any country attacked NYC tomorrow with dozens of massive bombs? F.uck Iran for sure (just so some dimwits don’t spin my first sentence as some insane support of them) but if the roles were reversed, you wouldn’t consider it war because….. reasons?
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, SectionC3 said:
Objectively I thought it was terrible. The focus was on Israel. Mr. secular "Prince of Peace" bombed an adversary for the benefit of Israel, not as part of his "America First" approach. And the "We love you God" line was just abhorrent. Invoking God while starting a war and deporting people who look like God's son is simply wrong.
Exactly. Everyone who does business with this guy eventually gets burned.
Of course it was terrible. He’s an awful speaker. I was speaking in jest since his Al-Baghdadi is known as objectively one of the most embarrassing speeches by a POTUS ever. So yes. This one was better. Seems like at least this time they gave him the phonetic spellings on his teleprompter. “We love you God.” 😂 -
3 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
If this is true, we will never ever hear it from this administration.
Im not sure how this can be confirmed - or what Drunken Pete says can be confirmed - until they either continue building a bomb (and from the rights on here, they are a country of dimwits, so unlikely) or they don’t.
-
13 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:
Hegseth might be the most unqualified person in any government position - and that’s saying a lot with the current admiration (Weestlemania queen calling AI “A1” over and over as the secretary of education might beat him out by a nose, but I digress).
But I’ll say picking nits over his choice of “our boys” (a commonly used phrase throughout military history) is why dems are seen as weak at times.
-
2
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, B-Man said:
It was certainly a far step up from his al-Baghdadi speech. I’ll give him that I suppose. -
1 minute ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
What can Iran really do? I'm sure they will try and do something stupid, which hopefully doesn't get any of our guys hurt. But hopefully they just take their medicine and STFU
I think everyone here can agree that we hope that’s what happens next.-
1
-
This seasons camp star
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
I’m now 45.
And our second is due in November.
I can only surmise that the Stockholm syndrome I’ve developed from being a Bills fan has expanded to all facets of my life. Typing this took all the energy I had left for the day.
And NOW back to bills talk: Justin Shorter is on the Raiders.