L Ron Burgundy
Community Member-
Posts
2,500 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by L Ron Burgundy
-
His website is what I'm referring to. You may know that and are just making a radio comparison but just pointing that out. 80k a day in revenue (from the court case) means selling a ton of crap to a lot of people. That's millions a week unless there are a few wealthy buyers which I doubt. Some fraud meaning the same as every election? Yup. To say there was widespread fraud is being naive to reality. Were there some Democrat led conspiracy, which some here contend, they would have gotten caught. To say they are savvy enough to pull something like that off is giving them too much credit.
-
The court case has determined he's been pulling in a lot more money than previously reported info shows. I think a lot more than 1% of the population listen to him and supports him by buying his trash online. Neither of us can prove our opinions but his net worth could be released soon which would provide a clue. The right loves conspiracy theories nowadays. They pop up here all the time. Shoot, election fraud is still being looked into in states Trump won with ZERO evidence.
-
Uhhh they were supposed to vet what they sent. Only stuff related to the trial. They didn't and sent everything on the phone. They asked to be able to mark things confidential now but that should have happened loooong ago. Can't wait to find out what crazy stuff Jones and Stone spoke about re JN 6. He's the definition of a pathological liar. And he has a huge base. Which is why I find it hilarious when conservatives say the left shifted to the extreme. He's a big part of the problem in our country.
-
Anyone paying any attention to the Alex Jones trial? Well it has been amazing if not, check it out. How is this related? Well Alex's lawyer screwed up and gave EVERYTHING from Alex's phone to the prosecution. J6 will subpoena that info, they'v easked for it already . I'm guessing there will be some crazy stuff released between Jim and Stone soon.
-
Turned out it was just 1 sentence removed, nothing was changed. It was 100% political theater from the right. They lied and people blindly believed them. Stewart said, and this sounds very plausible, that Toomey pushed for the rest of his pals to block this under false pretenses and now they're pissed at him because of the blowback.
-
GQP manufactured fear porn
L Ron Burgundy replied to BillStime's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
This is true but I do wish the left would ease up on some stuff. We have to be able to attract some conservatives to vote blue. We lose potential voters pushing for change a lot aren't ready for. -
Nothing. @Doc Brown summed it perfectly earlier in this thread. Reps voted for it before then 1 sentence was amended that changed virtually nothing. This is all games from the right (this time, the left certainly plays their games too). Another wonderful example of monkeys throwing crap at the wall plus misinformation.
-
You've got nothing. The right look like jokers here for voting this down for nonsense then lying about it. You defined discretionary for me earlier can you define hypocrisy? I'm thinking that may apply to someone that says think for yourself but blindly gargles Ted Cruz's sack. But define it for me so I can be sure. We shouldn't just blindly give money for anything, even vets, but our military's dumb decision messed these people up we should probably help them now.
-
Ah so now the pork is gone and it's just your opinion that the money won't be used as should. Aka, you were wrong. The discretionary piece was wanted, in Cruz's own words, by Republicans. We need at least to be able to agree on facts. There was no other spending in the bill, if you read it then you know that. What will happen later I don't know, I haven't commented on that. Some here are very quick to jump on misinformation from Twitter, blast it out on the forum, where the sheep then jump on it as fact. If I am wrong feel free to point out what money will not go to vets in there.
-
Me thinks you are incorrect. Ted wants the funding as discretionary not mandatory. Watch the videos pal. It was payback. The political theater is coming from the right this time. Also just because something is discretionary doesn't mean it won't go to vets. We overspend all the time this is one area I don't mind. The fist bumps were cool though.