SaulGoodman

So you say. And I'd argue that if they switched places (Mahomes playing at home with the Bills' roster and Brady as OC), Mahomes would have still won.

Wait...what? No, he's way better than Lawrence. Not sure what makes you think I believe otherwise. For active QBs, my tiers would be something like this: Mahomes Allen Jackson Stafford Burrow Rodgers Herbert Stroud Love Dak Hurts Purdy Goff Carr Cousins Mayfield Daniels Murray Tua, Lawrence, Geno, Darnold, etc

Guess you're right. I meant unbiased parties.

Marino's an outlier. Every other all-time great won at least won SB, and many won multiple. Obviously it's a team game, but it's really hard to argue that a guy with zero SBs was better than someone who won several. The QB has by far the most impact on a team's success of any individual player. I'd be very surprised if Allen never wins a SB, but until he does, he doesn't deserve to be ranked ahead of guys who won several. Especially someone who's won several in a handful of years, along with multiple MVPs. The excuses are a little sad to me. If he's the most talented QB ever (as I know many of you believe), he shouldn't need superstars at every position to have a winning record in the postseason or win an AFC championship. The guy's had one of the top defenses in the league virtually every year, good coaching, good tackle play, solid receiving weapons, and decent RBs. He's had some solid rosters to work with. Mahomes hasn't had a perfect situation. His WRs were bad the last few years, tackles have been weak for much of his career, the defense was mediocre/bad every year until last season, and the running game has varied from bad to average. Plus, Nagy's held the offense back these last two years (whereas Brady is doing the exact opposite for Buffalo). KC's had a weaker roster than all four Super Bowl opponents and still won 3 of them. I'd argue that they've had weaker rosters than several other playoff opponents too.

Marino was widely considered the GOAT? He’s usually nowhere close in that argument. And specifically due to the lack of championships. No QB has ever accomplished what Mahomes has at this point in a career. And those who are in the vicinity didn’t have the unique combination of abilities that Mahomes possesses. The off-platform sidearm throws, the athleticism, improv ability, escapability, instincts, arm strength, etc. Of course you’re going to favor your guy if there’s any argument to be made. But if the roles were reversed and you were a KC fan, you’d laugh your ass off at people claiming that Allen is obviously the better player. It’s like a Chargers fan claiming that Rivers had clearly surpassed prime Brady after a couple wins over the Lions and Browns. The narrative that Allen is disrespected by the media has always been ridiculous. He’s been hyped more than any QB in history with similar accomplishments.

This is where I point out the chasm in overall accomplishments, before you pivot back to “it’s a team game.” Records are meaningless at this point of the season. Do you actually think the Bengals and Ravens will be at the top of the draft? KC gets everyone’s best shot, and yet they appear to sleepwalk through most games. Because the regular season becomes a boring formality to a team that’s used to winning championships.

So the vast majority of analysts are casuals?

Well, of course you think that. Most unbiased fans don't. One QB is more dialed in because he has a lot more to prove. The other has nothing to prove and is facing much better teams.

The Bills have been running up the score on bad teams for 5 or 6 years now.

Lol. Yes, Allen's off to a better start through three games (vs bad teams). Crown him.

Yes. Rice wouldn't have been open all night without Worthy's presence.

I'm guessing that Allen/McDermott would have won more of those.

Your examples both include a KC TD being taken off the board, and also a negated INT, among other big calls that went against them. But everything’s slanted KC’s way because they called a late hit when Mahomes was a full 2 yds out of bounds, and a defensive hold that was defended by rules experts. I get that you guys hate the Chiefs, but you don’t have to make up false narratives to justify it. 😝

Everything slanted in their favor? Like when Taylor was relentlessly targeted by officials after joining KC, despite never having issues in four years in Jacksonville? Or the numerous TDs stripped off the board and turnovers negated the past few years? There were two total TDs negated by penalty last postseason...both scored by KC. Maybe it was the late hit call on Mahomes when he was a full two yds out of bounds in the AFCC. Or the fact that KC consistently falls somewhere between the most-penalized team in the NFL and middle of the pack?

Thought it was about results. Things have been pretty equal the last few years. Not sure that will be the case again this year though.

150+ voted Allen as the best QB in the NFL in the “If all things were equal” thread.

If it’s about results, why do so many here rate Allen higher than Mahomes?

I’ve always thought Elway’s a little overrated, but it could be because my earliest memories are of his later years. I haven’t seen the early part of his career other than YouTube clips. To me he’s a guy who was always a bit more myth and legend than reality. He was labeled the greatest prospect ever, so they bent over backwards to justify that narrative. I think people got sucked up in it, and then his legend grew as he developed a reputation for late comebacks. What they never mention is that Denver was often forced to come back because Elway played poorly the first three quarters. Or that his era of AFC dominance happened during an era in which the AFC was very weak and a team quarterbacked by Bernie Kosar was Denver’s top competition. Elway’s numbers were never elite either, even compared to peers at the time, and he had a ton of turnovers. Elway might have been as talented as any QB to ever live, but his production didn’t live up to his talent.

I'm not even necessarily saying you're wrong--I'm genuinely curious for insight as to why people think this. It seems to be a pretty strongly-held belief by most here. Obviously I think Reid is the better coach, and he's clearly accomplished more. But I don't think he's cracked some sort of code. What is he doing on a game to game basis that creates such an advantage for his QB? What makes him vastly superior to McD (a fine coach in his own right) overall? It obviously can't be the decisions at the end of the 13 seconds game, because Reid's made similar blunders 100 times in his career. I get that McD isn't very offensively adept, but he's surrounded himself with people who are.

Sure. And when you rank rosters, are you factoring in that Allen’s defense was ranked #1 in ‘21, or are you judging them based on one game vs an offense that averaged 36 ppg over the second half of the season? In general, I break it down as follows: Chiefs had a big edge in offensive talent Mahomes’ first two years, an edge (but smaller) the next two years, and the last two years I think Buffalo’s had more offensive talent. Allen’s had the better defense in 5 of 6 years, and considerably better in most seasons. Both QBs have “ifs.” If KC’s OL stays somewhat healthy in 2020, Mahomes has a good shot at another ring, on a field where they had already won convincingly. If KC had something resembling a defense in 2018, Ford’s alignment doesn’t matter and Mahomes has another SB appearance. And if not for a Bengal fingertip on a nice deep throw to Tyreek Hill, KC’s probably facing the Rams in the SB that year as well. He’s a few plays away from 6 SB appearances in 6 years. You can’t be much better than Mahomes has been in the playoffs. Take out a few errant throws across 18 games, and the dysfunctional 2nd half vs Cincinnati, and he’s been damn near flawless. If Allen played for Reid in KC, with the same exact accomplishments and numbers as Mahomes, do you really think you or any other Bills fan would be giving the credit to Reid? Remember that, in this scenario, Reid was fired by another franchise just 5 years before drafting Allen. I’m not sure that most think there’s a big gap. I don’t even think that. I think the differences are somewhat subtle. But I do think they’re there. All opinions are valid, of course. A lot of counter arguments go ignored though, and there are some questions I’m genuinely curious about. Such as: what is it specifically about Reid that gives Mahomes such a big advantage? Obviously Reid’s a better offensive mind, but McD is obviously the better defensive mind. The only specific criticism I ever seem to see of McD is in regard to his late decisions in the 13 seconds game. But you can make a list a mile long of poor clock management or in-game decisions by Reid. People glorify Reid’s goal line plays, especially “Corndog,” which turned out to be a play stolen from the Bills’ allegedly unimaginative staff. He went to the playoffs several times with Alex Smith, but McD went to the playoffs with Tyrod Taylor and a mediocre roster. What is it that makes Reid leagues above McD overall?

Allen had to do more early in his career, sure. I doubt many KC fans agree he's had to do a lot more in recent years. People that study rosters for a living, including PFF, have ranked Buffalo's rosters among the best in the league over the last 4 or so years. I'd agree with them. Few outside of here would claim that Mahomes' defense has consistently been good in the playoffs. He needed 38 pts to win a SB. His D allowed 31 in another SB. He lost an AFC title game despite scoring 31 vs a great Belichick D at home. In '19, his teammates put him in a 24-0 hole and the defense allowed 31...KC still won by 20. In the 13 seconds game, the D allowed 36 in regulation, DBs were falling down and leaving players wide open repeatedly, the running game did zilch and Butker missed two kicks. Other than Tyreek's YAC on the long TD play, he had little help from his teammates that night. In the '22 AFCC, he was working with practice squad WRs while hobbling on one leg. Last year he had crappy tackles and WRs. Most years he has little to no running game. The only times that Allen's defense truly failed were in the games vs KC. And we have a large enough sample at this point to say that few, if any, defenses are going to shut down a healthyish Mahomes/Reid offense in the playoffs. Allen's defenses have been fine outside of the KC games.

Yes, they went 12-4 with Alex Smith one time, but it took some luck to get there and they were bounced in their first playoff game at home. Harbaugh went 13-3 with Alex Smith. Is he even better than Andy Reid? And McD made the playoffs with Tyrod Taylor and a mediocre roster, in a division with Tom Brady. He must be the greatest of all.

No. There was an entire paragraph after that. And where’s the proof of the opposite?

Did Patriots fans retire from message board debates when their team started winning? That's not what fans do. The way I see a particular play or circumstance isn't going to change based on the number of wins my team accumulates. The only things that don't sit right are false narratives or highly subjective opinions tossed around as facts. Such as, in your last post, when you said that Allen is "just more exciting to watch." Not only is it not a fact, but it's not even an opinion I see that often. Mahomes is probably known more for exciting plays (improvisation, unorthodox throws, big conversions in big moments) than anything else. He just hasn't thrown a ton of deep bombs the last two years, for obvious reasons. It's also not a fact that Allen has been forced to carry his team more than Mahomes. A couple years ago, KC eeked out a 3 pt comeback win in OT vs a mediocre Titans team. Mahomes accounted for all but 7 of their 509 yds gained. That's carrying a team. In his first NFL start as a rookie, he went on the road and carried 2nd and 3rd stringers to a win. Even after being taken out of the game for a quarter and seeing the lead disappear. In '21, Mahomes had one of the best games of his career with Kelce out and Hill only playing a few snaps, vs a good Pitt defense. His top receivers were Byron Pringle, Derrick Gore, Darrel Williams and Hardman. All throughout college he carried bums that haven't been heard from since to big offensive stats and FBS records. A year ago, he carried a WR corps of Skyy Moore, Justin Watson, MVS and Marcus Kemp (practice squad) in the AFC Championship, while hobbled by a high ankle sprain. KC's highest rusher in that game (by far) had 26 yds. And, of course, he just carried maybe the worst WR corps (and one of the weakest pairs of tackles) to a SB win, despite one of the most difficult paths ever. Where does this idea come from that he can't or hasn't carried teams?

So…Allen is a better postseason QB because he has allegedly better postseason stats? Which equates to a few stats that are better by the smallest of margins (from a much smaller sample of games). When the sample size is this small, strength of competition is a big factor. The deeper you go into the postseason, usually the stronger the defenses you face. Allen didn’t have to play against this year’s Baltimore D or SF’s great defenses, didn’t have to face an elite Tampa pass rush with a 3rd string OL, etc. With the difference in sample and competition faced, a couple slightly better stats aren’t meaningful. Especially when he’s well behind in some important stats (including per game). Another reason it’s not meaningful is that Mahomes has a big edge in overall stats throughout their six years as starters.