-
Posts
2,668 -
Joined
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by 716er
-
-
Dinesh appreciates your donation.
-
ah yes telling one to ***** off is quite civil to those in the GOP
- 1
-
Fantastic article - enjoy
https://www.thebulwark.com/dinesh-dsouzas-2000-mules-is-a-hilarious-mockumentary/
Here’s the elevator pitch for 2000 Mules: D’Souza’s buddies at True the Vote spent $2 million on cellphone geotracking data—which he describes as “digital DNA”—that they say proves “mules” were paid to illegally “traffick” thousands of ballots from non-profit “stash houses” into drop-off ballot boxes.
All D’Souza really has—if the cellphone data is real and is really what he represents it as being—is some evidence that some people made frequent trips in areas around ballot drop-off boxes which, by design, were usually placed in heavily-traveled areas for convenience. Putting that aside, who are these mules? Who paid them? Where is the evidence of people making repeated trips to illegally stuff drop-boxes with ballots? What non-profits were involved? These questions are not even asked, let alone answered, in the movie. The theory of the case relies almost entirely on digital maps with dots and squiggles, supposedly demonstrating the questionable movement of the “mules.” Boom-Diggity. All that’s left is for the FBI to take it from here. Or something.
2000 Mules doesn’t survive the most basic fact-checks to support its most important claims. See them here, here, here, and here. But, let’s stipulate that the film’s purpose isn’t really to present facts. Because if it were true that D’Souza had rock-solid evidence of widespread voter fraud in his possession, would a true patriot like him be selling that evidence for $29.99 per download? Bwahahaha. (In defense of D’Souza, that $29.99 was only the premium VOD price. This week he dropped it to $19.99 to buy or just $14.99 to rent. Or you can get the movie free by purchasing an annual subscription to his Rumble channel!)
-
-
- 1
-
-
30 minutes ago, wnyguy said:
Maybe, but he did refute your claims first.
30 minutes ago, wnyguy said:Maybe, but he did refute your claims first.
He did not, sadly. The impersonator of a poster who was banned here for harassment is an intellectual lightweight coward afraid of honest discussion. -
On 4/15/2022 at 1:32 PM, DRsGhost said:
Unlike the actual DR, I have zero desire to interact with any of you blithering idiots.
Once you prove yourself worthy, and you most definitely have in a few short posts today, I bid you adieu with a one final ***** off and a one way irrevocable ticket to my ignore list.
Ready?
***** off.
Got ‘em
Imagine being such an intellectual coward that you claim to ignore folks yet read every word they say. -
There are many errors (a couple I have describe that have been ignored) in regards to how the data was collected by True the Vote. It’s safe to say the film is not an accurate summary of the data they collected.
Anyone with a shred of intellectual honesty should note these flaws and reevaluate their opinion accordingly.
-
32 minutes ago, mead107 said:
Do Violent video games contribute to this problem?
Violent video games are played by teens all over the word. School shootings regularly happen in America.- 1
- 1
-
Another thing I noticed in the film was True the Vote identified drop box “visits” using a radius of 100 feet.
I think a mailbox would be a good comparison for a drop box, size wise. A mailbox is roughly 2.5 by 2.5 feet. Let's be generous and say 5 feet (that's a huge fking mailbox). That leaves 95 extra feet of space.
Poor data collection.
- 1
-
I've watched the film and am wondering how the cell phone data referenced in the film distinguishes between someone who walked by a drop box on the sidewalk and someone who stopped and dropped a ballot/ballots off.
They did not go into detail on this at all. If I am a "mule" and dropped ballots off once at the drop box next to the Starbucks I go to each morning, the data would say I dropped a ballot off each day.
- 1
-
-
5 hours ago, 716er said:
How does the cell phone data referenced in the film distinguish between someone who walked by a drop box on the sidewalk and someone who stopped and dropped a ballot/ballots off?
Bueller?- 1
-
Very believable. This is America.
RIP to those lost. What a month
- 4
- 1
-
47 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:
Cool more deep state deep fakes and cover for this hapless administration that's been in charge for 18 of the 22 months this guy was there.
They also blamed the Marine Corp. Who is the Commander in Chief again?
Then, as if being fed talking points from the Biden administration - the Dad (100% a Democrat) - happily trashes MTG for reasons. I'm sure it had nothing to do with us canceling Russia and not wanting to set a cocaine dealer free.
-
How does the cell phone data referenced in the film distinguish between someone who walked by a drop box on the sidewalk and someone who stopped and dropped a ballot/ballots off?
- 1
-
8 minutes ago, B-Man said:
LOL.
Odd that a man pardoned by Trump would release the documentary. No conflict of interest there.
LOL
-
2,000 Mules is a pretty terrible source.
- 1
- 1
-
-
On 5/15/2022 at 3:13 PM, Big Blitz said:
banned everyone from the internet
You're still here
-
2 minutes ago, Doc said:
If he committed treason, he should hang for it, regardless of party. The only logical conclusion to be drawn is that they have nothing real against him.
There is evidence for obstruction of justice in the Mueller report, though, not treason.
-
-
Just as Elon Musk predicted, now that he’s a Republican his political enemies are smearing him by making him pay $250,000 four years ago to settle a sexual misconduct claim
Interesting how the self-titled champion of free speech writes an agreement asking a victim to remain silent.
Let’s take a moment to honor the sacrifice of our brave schoolchildren who lay down their lives to protect our right to bear arms
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
The thread title is literally what politicians have done since Sandy Hook.
B word and moan all you want. Maybe you can do it in your "War on Whiteness" thread.