Jump to content

Ghost_002!

Community Member
  • Posts

    822
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ghost_002!

  1. 7 minutes ago, Success said:

     

    I'm not going to go searching all over the place to prove anything.  I turn on any outlet, or go anywhere on the internet, and THE main narrative is "here they come again!"

     

    I haven't even heard anything about the Bills, except for Thanksgiving Day.  

     

    Like I said - I don't care.  Let everyone hype up the Pats to be all unbeatable and the best in the AFC.

     

     

     

    Bruh...that is not dissing the Bills. I mean have the Bills been shaky as of late, yes. What the media is supposed  to act like fans and just overact? The pats are on a winning streak, given the history and whose their coach...its really not hard to see why the patriots winning wouldn't be a hot topic, but none of it has dissed the Bills. And there is a tie in the division.....i mean..Just saying...

    • Agree 2
  2. 1 minute ago, Success said:

     

    Maybe "disrespect" is a stretch - but the media is pretty much back on the Patriots bandwagon.  The Bills are an afterthought right now.

     

    I don't care at all.  But don't pretend that the teams are being given any kind of equal treatment or coverage.  The Pats hype is through the roof right now.

     

     

     

    I am asking you again. Please show me from a "respected" media outlet that is straight up "disrespecting" the buffalo bills in favor of the patriots. And i do mean straight disrespect. Not because they "picked" the pats to win. 

    • Disagree 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, Success said:

     

    So, you're saying you haven't watched or listened to anything in the media?

     

    Got it.

     

     

     

    What media outlet has disrespected the Bills and please do not give me a Nick Wright post. I mean if fans don't get it's a schtick that goes on in sports shows now a days, i don't know what to tell you. Stephen A. has been poking at cowboy fans for years.....

  4. 3 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

    As of yet.... give it a day or two. If you haven’t seen / heard the constant Pat* ball washing you haven’t been paying attention. 

     

     

    Hype up the pats yes, but at no point has it or shouldn't to down play the Bills. I haven't heard it or see why it would be. I think Bills have proven to the media they are a good team, so i don't see how they are going to be disrespected.  

    • Eyeroll 1
  5. 4 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

    I'm going to ask an honest question... 

     

    Is The Patriots board so full of uneducated football fans and unbearable people that you can't post there? 

     

    And the people saying you feel trollish are kind of right.. if the bills kicked the Patriots ass for 20 years straight and I show up on your message board ... Nobody's going to think I come in good grace

     

    Use your brain and think of it from that standpoint

     

     

    Please explain how am i trolling? I am talking football. That is allowed here, no? Thats is what is done on EVERYONE message board by fans of said team and opposing fans. Why does a opposing fan have to be "trolling" because you don't like what they have to say...like how long have message boards been created. There are Bills fans on patriots message boards. Like some fans need to stop being so sensitive. 

     

     

  6. 4 hours ago, Hapless Bills Fan said:

     

    You play the team you face.

     

    Pity the Thumbtacks couldn’t capitalize more on Jones mistakes

     

     

    You know the rules.  Fans of opposing teams are welcome to talk football here.

    You get into taunting and trolling, Welp then

     

     

     

    To your first sentence. Do you seem me downing playing any bills wins? As i said. If the narrative is going to be well the pats played a injured Titans team. The same narrative can be looked at for the win on Thursday against the saint for the Bills, right?

     

    and please show me in ANY of my post, me taunting and trolling anyone. Come on man..you see all my post. let's not act like i come in here breaking any rules. 

  7. 3 minutes ago, Rockinon said:

    Oh you mean the game where Josh has 4 TDs and connected on over 80% of his passes? Yea, that's the game. Get your smack talk in now. It'll be short lived.

     

     

    smack talk? Is it not a reality? He did throw 2 picks to a injured Saints team right? I mean Pats shouldn't feel to good about beating up an injured Titans team...well same could be said for the bills  

  8. 8 minutes ago, Bubba Gump said:

    The Pats were +3 in turnovers, yet still had to settle for five FGs against a bunch of 3rd stringers, practice squad plays and guys off the street. We'll see what they're made of next week. I'm not all that worried. 

     

     

     Didn't you guys just beat a Saints team without their starting RB and starting QB(along with other injuries)? A game in which Allen thew 2 picks? 

     

     

  9. 5 minutes ago, Success said:

     

    Not THAT reassuring, for Pats fans.  He's already one of the oldest HC's in history.

     

    If he does keep coaching, good. I want to see him throw more phones on the sideline.

     

     

     

    ha ha i don't have to assure you of anything. It takes nothing to research this stuff yourself. I mean he's already disapproved he is not coaching past 70 given he is 69 now...ha ha

     

     

  10. ha ha all i can do is laugh now, only on the internet will someone try to disprove that a team is not rebuilding when it's been universally recognized as a rebuild. ha ha OK. 

     

     

     

     

     

    9 minutes ago, Success said:

     

    It makes sense when you consider that it's fairly well-known that BB doesn't want to leave the team in bad shape when he finally retires. He wants to set them up for success after he leaves.

     

    And he has also said that he doesn't want to coach too far into his 70's, like Levy.

     

    He spent like the typical offseason "winner" in FA, which he never does.  He's all in this year.

     

     

     

    https://www.si.com/nfl/2019/10/29/bill-belichick-coaching-past-age-70#:~:text=Patriots head coach Bill Belichick previously said he,footsteps and coach past the age of 70.

     

     

    You have no other evidence that suggest he is stopping soon..

  11. 11 minutes ago, Success said:

     

    The Pats aren't "rebuilding."  BB probably will not coach much longer, and they're trying to win 1 more while he is still the coach.

     

    NE has one of the oldest teams in the league.  Mac Jones looks good because he is incredibly well-coached. We'll have to see if he's still the franchise guy once he has to carry a team.

     

     

     

    They rebuilt the team...I have no clue why it's so hard for some of you to realize that. They rebuilt the team. That is/was the phase this current NE team is in. He is going to coach until he doesn't want to anymore, no signs of him stopping anytime soon. If he was trying for win 1 more, he would not have gotten ride of Brady to go with a rookie QB. That makes no sense. 

     

     

     

    • Haha (+1) 1
  12. 19 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

     

    Correct.   It was not a re-build.

     

    They had a ton of opt-outs in 2020 and no QB but they were still competitive and never had a culture issue.

     

    They just saved up their shekels in 2020 and spent with abandon in the offseason.........and Belichick always turns over his rosters relentlessly and ruthlessly so it wasn't any big deal adding a ton of new players.

     

     

    haha bruh is was a re-build. You let go your franchise QB you are rebuilding since that is what generally makes or breaks a franchise now a days.

     

    BB NEVER overhauls a whole team, nor does he spend like crazy. He had to given how 2020 turned out and the pressure from the owner. He tweaks here and there with his rosters, but last year was something different, and why the media made a big deal about it because BB never spent like that before. 

  13. 6 minutes ago, Bubba Gump said:

     

    The Pats have been trying to draft Brady's replacement for years now. But all of a sudden they're starting over because Tom left. Gtfo with your ongoing nonsense.

     

     

    ??? They actually did when they drafted jimmy garoppolo, but the owner made them trade him away to keep brady which obviously made sense because they won another SB again. So no, they were not trying for years....plus hence why Cam Newton was picked up late in the off season last season because they really didn't have a plan B after brady was not going to sign for cheap. 

    4 minutes ago, Putin said:

    We don’t know what the case is yet , I still think they are a .500 team I don’t see anything special 

     

     

    They are tied for 1st place? What do you mean? Their defense is playing better actually statically 2nd behind buffalo. RBs are solid and QB is not making any mistakes, plus their coaching staff is true to form. They fact you feel they are actually .500 and they are not is more a test to who they are and what the coaching staff has done. 

  14. 25 minutes ago, Putin said:

     

    Was that a rebuild really ? They drafted a QB and spent $200 million in free agency 

     

     

    Yes...you get rid of your franchise winning QB you are starting over. In fact it's even sweeter because those two reasons is why everyone thought they were going to suck for longer, but it's starting not to be the case.  

    • Eyeroll 1
  15. 23 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

    One thing I find interesting with all these Pats fans and Psuedo-Bills fans on here the last few weeks is they never consider another scenario.

    It's just the Pats will roll without much resistance. I think they should consider the following:

     

    1. Bills at home on Monday night with 10 Days of rest, and the Pats have to play a tough game against Tenn.

    2. Bills are due for a focused, flawless game. Our record in close games this year reflects not a lot of good fortune.

    3. They have a rookie QB who hasn't had to face much adversity this year. This could be the game-it's coming.

     

    So, Pats fans and trolls, you better hope the above doesn't prove true.

     

     

    Patriots are tied for first in year 2 of their rebuild. Pats fans shouldn't worry. 

    • Vomit 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  16. 27 minutes ago, P Riv said:

     

    Fair question... I'm just going off the 20+ year trend of how Hoodie builds and coaches his teams.  That defense is real, not some statistical smoke and mirrors fakery going on.  Anything is possible on any given Sunday, but long term trends indicate the high probability that they will play a certain way.  That's what I'm forming a (fan) opinion from.  We picked on Hoodie for his bad drafts, letting Brady go, spending lots of cash in free agency to fix the bad drafts, starting a rookie QB, etc.  There's no way that will work....lol

    Well, it appears at this point that he got it right this offseason and our one year reign is now a dog fight with a hungry junk yard dog.  It's going to be fun as hell to watch.  

     

    Agreed, but I don't see the Titans winning this one with so many people missing on offense.  It's going to be Hoodie vs Tanneyhill with average weapons, not a good look.  

     

     

     

    Well said, I wanted to reply to the first poster you replied to, but honestly couldn't form an opinion as well put together as you did. 

  17. 21 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

     

    Really?  So you know exactly how your team will play but I can't have feelings that I doubt my team shows up for 6 points ever again?

     

     

    What you read was me telling you "strategically" how the patriots play or will like to play. Completely different than talking about effort or playing with emotion. And come on man...you now telling me because "you're" saying they won't score 6 points again, that means they won't? You for real? 

     

    I heard a few fans on this board say the pats can't score more then 15 or 17  a game at the beginning of the season....well looks like that is completely wrong. My point, you can't predict for sure the outcome of these games. 

     

     

  18. 1 hour ago, Greg S said:

     

    I am not saying the games are going to be easy for the Bills because they won't be. Some on this board are making NE out to be this unstoppable force which they aren't. The Browns certainly have a better D-line than the Bills but the Bills have the better secondary. In that game Mac only threw for only 198 yards. He did have 3 TD's which is impressive but he is still a game manager. Bottom line if the Bills bring their "A" game they will win. Allen gives the Bills the advantage on offense. Both defenses are solid. I do expect two very close and competitive games.

     

     

    See again....the patriots offense option isn't Mac. It's the running game. Beside you guys, the Pats played Brown and Panthers, two top defenses and like you said the Browns D-line is better. Look at the pats run stats-against the Browns and Panthers. Against the panthers they rushed for 151 yards. Using 3 backs. Stevenson had 62/Bolden had 54 and harris had 30

     

    against the browns they ran for 184 yards. Stevenson had 100/Bourne had 43 and bolden  had 32. Harris did not play he was injured and he is their top back. It's Harris/Stevenson then bolden....

     

    They are going old school this year. Run and defense. The pass is complimentary like a jab to a boxer. The pass is not how they are trying to beat you if they can help it. 

     

     

     

     

     

    12 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

     

    Obviously if they come with the same effort against the Jags it will turn out bad.  What makes you think they will?

     

     

    What makes you think they wouldn't? You have no idea how they are going to play. Or as  I said, if the were schemed into playing that way. You do not know. 

     

×
×
  • Create New...