CosmicBills

Do you not think a WR or CB fits into what this staff is trying to accomplish? Are these not areas where the Bills are in need of a talent infusion? Not trying to argue, just curious as to your thought process.

I'll take that bet.

Agree 100%.

I only re-posted your own words ... Words you've decided to ignore when discussing other players on the Bills' roster other than Fitzpatrick. You've even used those words to disparage other fans who had the audacity to suggest Fitz isn't the answer for the Bills by calling those fans "haters" -- implying (if not outright stating) that the fans who don't blindly accept Fitz as the answer are in fact not really fans of the Bills at all. And yet today you made it abundantly clear that you have no interest in blindly supporting the players on the Bills roster. Instead you've chimed in on two threads where you bring up similar questions about Bell and Fred Jackson (the best player on the Bills roster ... by a mile) that your so-called "Fitz Haters" posed about Ryan. You can try to run from your own words or pretend that what I'm saying is in some way inaccurate, but again, all I did was post your own words. So it's either you weren't being honest in previous posts, or you are just looking to make hardline stances that you yourself don't even believe in. By the way, that's the definition of a troll. So which is it?

Absolutely!

I'm not hellbent on anything. Just merely pointing out something I find fascinating about your inconsistent posting history. It's just funny that when you question someone's ability on the Bills roster it's okay. But when someone else does so it's "biatching" and you think they should shut their trap and just support the players we have. I'm sure the other posters who you called out for not being "haters" also find this hypocrisy interesting. As for Bell, I don't care if he stays or not. I've been on record as saying that the Bills have serious talent and depth problems all along their offensive line. Bell included. But then again, I'm of the mind that it's okay for fans to question the players on their favorite team's roster. You're the one who thinks that's sacrilege. Then again, based on your comments in this thread, apparently you don't even believe the drivel you've been spouting for the past few weeks. Maybe there's hope for you yet.

Got it. You're the only one capable of determining whether or not a player is worth supporting or if he isn't. But if anyone disagrees with you they're "biatching" and not supporting the team.

Would you take Tebow on the team if that happened?

It's not a personal attack to point out your hypocrisy on the issue of player personnel. Your record on the matter is clear: So it's cool for you to "biatch" about players on the team like Bell and Jackson ... but it's not cool for anyone to question Fitz. Got it.

Your hypocrisy on matters of player personnel on the Bills is fascinating.

He's a Bill! You should support the players on the roster! You must not be a true fan.

You ain't lying. Not defending the Skins at all. Over the same span they've only managed to win 81 games (41% winning percentage) ... but they've also made it to the playoffs twice (both times making a first round exit). As bad as the Skins have been, the Bills have been worse. Both teams trying opposite approaches, both teams ending up in essentially the same spot.

It's true. The guys running the Bills have so much patience and poise they've slowly and steadily built a team that's only been able to win less than 40% of its games in the past 12 years. 76 wins to 116 loses. Slow and steady is fine if it's leading towards something. Slowly and steadily treading water in the basement of the NFL, like the Bills have been doing for over a decade, is something else.

How would being circumcised before you watch the movie have any bearing on your enjoyment of it?

I don't think Ralph is cheap. I think he either lacks the ability or the desire to build a winning team. There's a giant difference.

But some of them aren't! :tinfoil hat smiley:

The only reason the record is out of context (to you) is because you're under the belief these last 2 years are somehow "new" when my point is they are just more of the same ... and if anything, LESS than the same in terms of wins losses. They're the same because it matters not who's calling the shots on personnel when Ralph, Little-man and Overdork are really the ones running the show.

I thought it was fun ... Until I saw how many "sightings" occurred on my street THIS MONTH. I blame Googlebot for ratting me out to the Greys.

Ignorant: Lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated. That's not a misuse of the word -- it sums up his post. He's making incorrect correlations which demonstrate his complete lack of knowledge and sophistication.

The entire premise of his post. And your defense of it makes you just as silly.

No one classifies Rodgers as a pocket QB. He's mobile and athletic and throws more passes on the run, out of the pocket than he does inside it. It's what makes him good.

When it comes to player movement? Yes. Everyone knows this, no one more so than the players in the only professional league without guaranteed contracts.

You're right. We can't compare it because Jauron still managed to win more games. Jauron came in to a team with as little talent as Nix and Gailey had (if not less) and still won more games. Does that make him better? No, Jauron was a trainwreck. But the purpose is to WIN games, not feel good about ALMOST winning. In the end, you're judged by what you did, not what you wanted to do. And so far Nix and Gailey have won 31% of their games. This has been the problem with the Bills -- they have been reshuffling the deck for so long they're mired in mediocrity. Actually, calling it mediocre is being kind. Now you and the others look at what Nix and Chan are doing and say, "things are on the upswing!" But we've been here before. We've been here with Greggo, we've been here with TD, we've been here with Jauron, and now we're here with Chix. It's more of the same. It's more "look at this flashy toy and ignore the real problem with this team" ... Mr. Wilson.

Not only an ignorant post, but a ridiculous one. The moment you label Aaron Rogers as a "pocket passer" is the moment you reveal yourself to be a fool. Try watching some football, then report back. And now we know why H2o isn't a GM. Yeah, god forbid the NFL get a new crop of star QBs to carry the league for the next decade.