I do not understand the logic or the benefit of the Tuck Rule. What is the purpose of it? He was not throwing the ball, he was bringing it in to protect it and he fumbled it, so its a fumble. What am I missing?
Ok - it did not cost us the game but it cost us 7 points in a game we lost by 3. Go figure.
I don't understand the Johnson call either. He caught it, went on his kness with full posession, and they are saying he did not have control as he went down? He was already down with control?
This cost us an opportunity to pad a 7 point lead and take time off of the clock.