syhuang

Better than a guy like you without a brain.

No, you're wrong again

You already write Roscoe off after one year in NFL. No wonder you like to grade a draft before the rookies play a NFL game.

good, the whole thread proves the grading on this draft now means absolutely nothing.

Isn't B better than C+ ??

Didn't you post the same thing about 10 minutes ago and nobody replied to you? Nice way to get attention by reposting the same stuff again and again.

Because Marv & Co believed Whitner and McCargo wouldn't be available several picks later.

Exactly, these board experts should stop using mock drafts to criticise Marv's picks.

You are obviously not aware that Levy has long history of evaluating college prospects.

You should stop reading mock drafts and assume you're a draft expert. Also, reading Clayton's or Kiper's columns also won't help you. Was any of them at the war rooms to know how the draft board was ordered? Do you know there're 'backups' and in a football team? How about 'special team'? Again, how do you know Whitner and McCargo would be available in several picks laters? Because Clayton, Kiper, or the so-called "experts" said so? Were they at the war rooms of the teams picked after Bills so they're sure Whitner and McCargo would be still on board? No, they were not, just like all the fans.

If Marv had drafted Davin Joseph at #8, many board 'experts' would have asked for his head or simply killed themselves. Their mock drafts didn't say so!!!

Any draft grades before the rookies play a NFL game mean nothing. My lucky 8 ball does as good grading as these 'experts'.

Just show a mock draft which has FEW picks which was actually notable drafted higher. And you haven't responded the mock drafts which have Whinter at #8 and McCargo at late 1st round. Don't these mock drafts count?

Really!? Show a mock draft which only has few notable exceptions. How many mock drafts have Mario Williams at #1 overall? How about Leinart in #10? How about Chad Jackson in second round? How about Winston Justice in second round? How about Ashton Youboty in third round? How about D.Bing and G.Watson not drafted after round three? These are the picks which are way off. The Whitner and McCargo picks are not that "off" compared to above examples. (The only person said McCargo was projected to 3rd round was Kiper and he said that was "some time ago") Also, don't forget that there're mock drafts which have Whitner goes to Bills at #8 and McCargo goes to late 1st round.

Right, the words they used were "could have", "probably", and "maybe". How do they know the players would be still available several picks later? Last time I checked, they were not in ANY of the war rooms just like all the fans.

See you use the word "probably", do you have more concrete evidences that Bills could still draft Whinter after trading down or draft McCargo without trading up? Were you in the war room? or the whole thing is just your speculation and you badmouth OBD based on your imagination.

Clayton's opinion means nothing. He's only correct in half of the time, about the same ratio of my lucky 8 ball.

Frostee Rucker was drafted by Cincinnati at 91st pick.

Are you saying you are better than Marv in evaluating college prospects? When is the last time you worked for a pro football team? Between Marv's and your evaluations, it's not hard to figure which one to trust?

You think you're the only one? And how does this have anything to do with the draft?

You make too much sense to him.

and you need to create a new thread when other board experts already had many "idiot Marv" ones?

http://www.buffalobills.com/blog/index.jsp?post_id=163 But several franchises, particularly those seeking a one-gap tackle, have now moved him ahead of players such as Michigan's Gabe Watson, Miami's Orien Harris and Texas' Rodrique Wright. Two general managers asked this week about McCargo had him graded in the lower third of the first round, and acknowledged his stock is rising.

But your opinions on the remaining OT and OG prospects suggest you should stop pretending you're an expert.

I'm not the one pretending I'm an expert on evaluating prospects. On the other hand.....