-
Posts
1,383 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
Recent Profile Visitors
2,936 profile views
syhuang's Achievements
RFA (5/8)
1.3k
Reputation
-
-
11/17/24 Game 11 GAMEDAY! Bills vs Chiefs post game Thread
syhuang replied to BuffaloBill's topic in The Stadium Wall
As much as I hate to say it, I give them credit on this defensive play. If their defensive line contain Allen well especially the DE, the result could be very different. -
11/17/24 Game 11 GAMEDAY! Bills vs Chiefs post game Thread
syhuang replied to BuffaloBill's topic in The Stadium Wall
As Allen mentioned in his post-game interview, Brady called a man beater while Chiefs hid their zone well that Allen didn't recognize it to audit it out. By looking at this tweet, the play was well designed to beat man. Brady called a good play on this 4th down critical play. Chiefs also defended the play well. If they had a spy on Allen like Romo said, Shakir or Cooper would likely be open. -
I'm pretty sure most people commented in this thread know Dayo's intention was to punch out the ball and find it interesting few act like they discover the New World that others do not realize that. The question here is not the intention of punching the ball out, the question is whether it deserves a penalty or fine with several swings not even close to the ball. The whole play can be seen in this link: https://x.com/2019raptor700r/status/1855709057962869213. He took several swings and only the first one was relatively close to Allen's left hand holding the ball. The ensuing swings weren't close to the ball including the last swing hitting Allen's helmet. Most people know his tried to punch the ball, but question whether the several swings not close to the ball deserves a penalty or fine. Should NFL draw a line between punching out the ball and simply punching a player including helmet? Could players now simply punch any player as long as that player has the ball and just use punch out the ball as excuse?
-
Week 11 - Chiefs at Bills Game Week Thread
syhuang replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall
i thought it’s quite obvious. They are already in the list of the other poster’s earlier post showing TEs having much more yards in 2nd year implying TEs don’t do something similar will be a failure. Here is to provide counterevidence that there are other successful TEs having similar 2nd-year receiving yards as Kincaid’s pace. Thus, number of yards in 2nd year isn’t an indicator how good or how bad a TE will be in his career.- 825 replies
-
- 13
-
Week 11 - Chiefs at Bills Game Week Thread
syhuang replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall
Greg Olsen - Year 2 - 574 yards, Year 3 - 612 yards Shannon Sharpe - Year 2 - 322 yards, Year 3 - 640 yards Zack Ertz - Year 2 - 702 yards Dallas Clark - Year 2 - 423 yards, Year 3 - 488 yards Tony Gonzalez - Year 2 - 621 yards Vernon Davis - Year 2 - 509 yards, Year 3 - 358 yards Heath Miller - Year 2 - 393 yards, Year 3 - 566 yarda Cole Kmet - Year 2 - 612 yards, Year 3 - 544 yards David Njoku - Year 2 - 639 yards the point here is that year 2 receiving yards don’t define a tight end. Most Bills fans want to see Kincaid take off, but his current pace in year 2 isn’t an indicator of how good or how bad his career will be. -
So you decided to resort to bully and victim stance claims and don't plan to back up your claim and post your calculation or formula used to call out others even though you said you already did it once yesterday? Got it.
-
Yes, let's break it down and don't need to do it in PM. What are the length of two sides you measured accurately in 3.37 seconds? Show us the exactly screen shot before and after you used and how you came up with the accurate measurement.
-
For someone claims he is so smart than others, let's get one fact straight, do you agree or disagree Coleman didn't run straight line parallel to sideline after he stumbled? It's pretty clear to me that when he stumbled, he was around left hash mark and he was in the right side of the right hash mark in the end. Not sure if that's also clear to you or if you're going to spin it to something else so just want to get your word that he wasn't running parallel to sideline. If you agreed he indeed didn't run straight line parallel to sideline, how could you just use the yardage difference between the roughly 31 yard line (after he stumbled) in BIlls side to ~42 yard line in Titans side to say he traveled 27 yards (in 3.37 seconds). Isn't it elementary math 101 that a triangle's hypotenuse is longer than both opposite side and adjacent side? Before you claimed Coleman did run pretty straight but just not parallel to sideline and you were so smart to use elementary math Pythagoras’ Theorem to calculate hypotenuse, let's show how you came up with both opposite side length and adjacent side length of the triangle first. One of them is very easy, which is the difference in yard line, but for the other, how did you accurately measured it by broadcast screen shot to get very accurate measurement? Ha Ha, I just noticed the same and replied after you. We both noticed the flaw in his claim. 😁 Let's see what excuse he came up with in his "smart" calculation.
-
today we learned it’s an apple-to-apple comparison between extrapolated 40-yard time in game with pads on and 40-yard time in combine and pro day without pads.😆
-
Week 4 - Bills at Ravens Game Week Thread
syhuang replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall
-
Week 4 - Bills at Ravens Game Week Thread
syhuang replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall
-
Week 4 - Bills at Ravens Game Week Thread
syhuang replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall
He hopes he can come back next week, but isn't sure about it. -
Week 4 - Bills at Ravens Game Week Thread
syhuang replied to BillsFan619's topic in The Stadium Wall