Virgil

In fairness, he doesn't even know if he'll be on the team next year. Fitz and Losman both did it and were gone within 2 years. If he gets the reins and we commit to him, then get back to me

I didn't think there was a tag that didn't allow the player to leave under any circumstances. That would suck if he got hurt during that year

If some of these big name QBs get franchised tagged, like Eli, Russell, Rivers, is it still a pair of first round picks for another team to sign them away? If that's the case and Wilson gets tagged, I would hope to see us jump on that. I feel like it isn't that easy though

It's just too bad that the Guard position isn't as easy to transition to Tackle. We would have 3 guards and no RT still, unless someone actually pans out

I know we drafted a guy, but this would be a huge upgrade for us. I'd be fine paying him and having some competition for the G spots. However, if we really are going to re-sign Dareus then we pry don't have the money

Option 2 - But they are 10-6 and don't make it in on a tie-breaker and EJ didn't start and get it together until after they starter 1-4. In that case, yes!

They had to keep it fair to the league. You can't have that much talent on the roster. Tuel walks on the field, it's over

Going off the headline

I think we are gonna see some decent post-June 1st cuts this year. And some signings.

Miss or miss a beat, it's still nuts to think that it won't affect the team. If it were that easy, then we should just trade him now.

Sorry, but this is absolutely ridiculous. Why we won't miss out pro-bowl anchor? Try again

What I'd be willing to give up has nothing to do with Kaep. It's about the qb position. What would an average qb do for this roster immediately? So would I give up on 10 players, who aren't on the roster, who only have a 40% chance of making the team and 20% chance of staying on the team for 10 years? Yes, yes I would. We can't keep playing the qb hunting game. It's been 20 years. So if we did something that extreme to fix that problem finally and basically guarantee us the playoffs for the next few years....I'd be good. I'd also do this for any mid tier qb. They are that hard to find. At least for us For Luck, I'd give my next three drafts away. Crazy? I bet the colts would still say no.

No matter what you think of Kaep in terms of overall QB rankings, he is better than what we have and what will become available to us over the next few years. He's also proven he can get his team to the Super Bowl. With that, I would do whatever it takes to get him if he really is available. And yes, I'd give up multiple first round picks. In fact, I'd give up this next years draft and next years 1st and 2nd for him. Think that's insane? Well how about 20 years of not having a qb? How about making the playoffs this year and going forward? You think those picks of more depth on a quality roster is going to make that change? No, because it hasn't before. It's a QB league and we are a team that hasn't found one in two decades. I'd sell the farm and look crazy doing it just to know that the QB question is answered for the next decade.

This

For me, this boils down into two camps. 1 - it's about the impact of the cheating, which is highly debatable 2 - it's about the fact that pats knew the rule, executed a plan to break it, then denied it. Regardless of the impact. I'm in the #2 camp. And the fact that they did this, plus spygate, plus the bs formations. I'm fine with the ruling. Not because I hate the Pats, but because the consistent middle finger to the league and acting better than everyone else. If the Bills did this, I'd be pissed. I'd rather lose with integrity than win a Super Bowl with Billicheat and Marsha

It's not that the final two games were affected, it's that Brady shouldn't have played in them. Hence, they were played under unfair circumstances

I like that this happens. It shows the many on the board can think objectively, even when it involves a team we hate. It makes for better conversation

If all of these actions are deemed to have happened, why would their two wins after the fact still count? College teams strip wins and titles all the time. If I'm the Ravens or the Seahawks, I'm pissed. They played games against a QB that shouldn't have been in they game. And the team itself has been found guilty. I know this won't happen, but I'd me more pissed that this ruling took so long and our current "super bowl" champs are frauds AGAIN

perfect

Again, how did this happen before Saturday? I thought no real visits or money could be discussed before then.

I'm very confused. I thought he couldn't sign until Saturday or have real visits? So how did he negotiate a contract? I agree that the kid is free to make his own choice. But, was it a fair playing field?

Get us a QB and I'll join you.

Didn't see this posted, but apparently he can't officially meet with teams until Saturday. Maybe that's why players and Rex handled things the way they did.

That's a bit dramatic. You put a top 10 QB on our team last year, we are in the afc championship game. You put Rodgers on our team this year, we are super bowl favorites.

It's all about the QB and I agree.