Virgil

If owners who hired HC's that didn't perform in the first two seasons were inept fools, almost all of them would be

I thought the racial undertones in Zootopia were a bit much. I get the message, but it was beaten to a pulp. Batman vs Superman was fantastic. If you read the comics and knew all the references and stories they touched on, it was actually brilliant. If you didn't like Man of Steel, then you won't like this. I think that everyone wants to have an opinion and it's easier to hate something because it doesn't match your vision. This isn't the Reeves Superman and it's not Nolan's Batman. It's Frank Millers Batman and it's Loeb's Superman. And they are considered the best writers for each characters of all time. If you want bubblegum comic movies, watch Avengers.

As for my definition and understanding. A DT in a 4-3 is a DE in a 3-4. So a NT would come in and we'd have Dareus and Kyle on the outsides. All of our normal DE's become OLBs. Correct?

So hold on, I thought a 3-4 had a NT and 2 DE's on the line. Are you saying that it's a NT and 2 DT's? I'm honestly confused.

That's the thing about this whole switch that bugs me. I don't claim to really understand the perfect players fit for a 3-4 or 4-3. I know that Dareus and Kyle are DT's in a 3-4 and you want a big, space eating NT for a 3-4. I don't think that Dareus is that kind of a NT, but I don't think he's a DE in that scheme either. Basically, we are taking people who are All-Pros in one position and moving them to a place that diminishes their talents. And now, we have created more positions that we have to fill because of the scheme change when we already have plenty of other positions to fill

If they are looking at them as NT? Yes. Because we have needs at other places to waste a first round pick on a position we already have a 15 mil guy at.

I love how they say he's similar to Marcel Dareus. If that's the comparison, then no thank you. We already have one

Do your thing sir. I've enjoyed your posts. And don't be dumb enough to think that anyone is going to take over for you. People will try, but there's a reason that so many people responded to your posts, and it's not just lyrics... Sadly, I have the same feeling about the direction of this team. So now's as good a time as any

this is !@#$ing stupid. The Ralph is more than fine. The money grab here is obvious

He was 0-2 last season. What's different?

I'm more interested in what this does to the punting decisions. While only 5 yards, am I going to punt as much in opponents territory if you are adding to the yards I'm giving them?

I'm super excited to hear that Rex is still going to force feed his defense, call the plays, and change up out personel. And since we don't have money, which is locked up in people who don't fit the scheme, we are going to do it with rookies and C free agents. I'm sure between that and our currently guys playing to their weaknesses, I'm sure this will go great. I'm so excited

Off topic, but you mentioned it. I still think the Redskins won that deal, as well as proved another valid point, which is to take a starting qb if he's on the board. Goal #1 is to win a champion. Goal #1B is to be relevant and sell tickets. RG3 was a financial gold mine between jersey sales and interest in the team. And now, because they took cousins as well, they may have liability as well. What do the Rams have?

1 - Because they've been desperate for a QB for years and you can't win without one (Don't mention Denver this year) 2 - Again, assuming he's there. Sometimes you have to trade up to make sure no one does it before you. It's security. If you KNEW FOR A FACT that the Titans were staying at #1, then I'd agree. But if they get that phone call at the last minute and trade back and you don't get your guy, what then?

I think I'm working Cleveland and if I get a 2nd and 4th to drop back one spot, that's a win. I'd try to work teams picking in the top 4 so I still get my guy and I don't think that's unrealistic. But their OT will be there at 3 and I think you have to try to get there

Right now, the conversation is either offensive tackle or trade out of the number one spot. They obviously feel comfortable with Mariotta at qb. The gm has come out and said it will take a kings ransom to trade the pick away. Cleveland is almost definitely going qb at #2. If I'm a Titans fan, I want to trade that pick at all costs and this is the dream scenario. There's arguably two qbs worth going top 5. There are a solid top 15 players this year. I'm hoping my gm is not only taking offers, but making them. I'm using this to stockpile picks and really build into my team. If the teams stays at 1, I think I'd be pretty upset. Thoughts

Signed for 5.5 mil to the Ravens. I would have made that deal. Oh well

I got turned onto using them this past year. It's a whole new kind of clean. 5/7 recommend

I think that was the idea at the beginning of the season, but then injuries happened and he made quite a few starts at CB. I only know because I remember seeing flashes of brilliance from him again.

Law of a averages. Most teams would consider 2-3 impact starters a success from a draft. But that's not every time and I'm giving us the benefit of the doubt based off the last few years. McKelvin was our #3. Even if you want to debate that, this is a league where 4 WR sets are more and more common. He was on the field a lot last year and needs to be replaced. And yes, it's a deep D-Line draft. So, if we replace Mario, get a LB, and a RT with 1-3, we still need to get those other positions filled. Plus, the goal is to be better. Our LB's were terrible last year. And I mean, terrible. We don't really know about Aaron Williams. We don't know if Woods was having an off year. We don't have a #3 WR. So, there are more holes to fill than most people find success with in a draft and 2nd/3rd tier FA's. That, and the goal is to improve from year to year. Now, what that has to do with my belief that Rex is a used car salesman type coach who hasn't proven anything in the past 5 years and should be arrested for interview fraud, I have no idea. Or should I equally assume that you are drunk and have no idea what you are saying by your screen name?

If the plan is depth from FA and 2-3 starters from the draft, I feel like the best we can hope for is a wash in talent. We lost starters at DE, LB, CB and needed a RT, another LB, arguably a #2 WR. I don't see how we can get better and we are banking on draft success. Which, based off the past few years, not impossible to believe.

Awesome. Happy to be wrong

Jesus, 4 mil a year for Hogan. Jackpot and good job for him

I mean yeah, but we had a player there. We don't have anyone at LB right now with potential and not even enough to really run a 3-4.

Yeah, yesterday was terrifying. I'm actually glad we weren't apart of it and am not looking forward to next year. I am curious why the extension with Glenn and Gilmore is taking so long though