newcam2012

He's really creative. He's be really good with Josh Allen. Too bad it's not going to happen.

I don't think anyone is "there" compared to KC come playoff time. They are just a different animal come playoff time. After them, the pecking order is more debatable. IMHO, Houston is right in the mix or "there" with about 6 other teams which includes Buffalo.

May I kindly remind you that making the playoffs isn't the ultimate goal of the team. Especially when you have a healthy #17.

Come playoff time his results, game planning, and preparation is average at best. He's been consistently out coached in the playoffs. It's one of my least favorite things about him.

Without research, I would have thought it was Andy Reid.

I'm not a stats guy. I do know 4th and 1 is much easier to make than 2 and 3 and do on. What does analytics say? I totally get going for it. I didn't hate going for it. I just was leaning towards kicking it.

I think that is one way to see it. However, there is an equally compelling case to be made for kicking the FG. The old adage of taking the points especially on the road wasn't a bad thought. I don't agree with your statement that there was no risk. A failed conversation would have immediately changed the momentum of the game. We all know how important momentum is. It likely would have jump started the Miami team and fans. Of course, it's all hindsight and the Bills converted it into a TD. So obviously it was the correct call based on the results. Your mindset here isn't wrong. It's an aggressive thought. Being aggressive comes with consequences on both sides. Agree but the percentages were much higher of a FG make vs a 1st down conversation.

I wanted the Bills to take the points. I understand going for it. Watching live, I just felt like it was a bit too risky. Three yards on the road seemed like a bit too risky. I didn't want the Dolphins to have a just of emotional and momentum if they stopped the Bills. Plus, even if the Bills make it ; there was no guarantee of a TD. Poor was a happy to be wrong as I watched Cook gallop into the end zone.

I was of the mindset that fencing indicated it was a more serious concussion. Good stuff here. Thanks

I sadly and with no glee predict Tua is going to play again. Next year, he will get another concussion and it will be devastating. His speech will be severely impaired for years and his memory will be substantially impaired. It's not a matter of if. It's a matter of when. The NFL needs to force him to retire.

I'd be surprised if Spector can stay injury free. He's the football version of Anthony Davis.

I think you are spot on here.

I hear you Scott. I think the Bills offense is still a work in progress after 2 games. I myself, would like to see a little more play action from a traditional QB under center. I think it really out additional pressure in defenses. I will say the Bills running game looks legit. Cook and Davis look more explosive and are able to get more chunks yards. The oline is blowing defensive players off the line of scrimmage. That Cook 50 yard TD was a thing of beauty. This balanced attack should lead to bigger passing games for Allen when needed. After two games, I don't think we fans can quibble about a lot. I'm interested to see how teams attack the Bills offense throughout the season.

It's one game at a time theory for me. But I wouldn't be mad at 2-2 for the next 4 games. That would take the Bills to 4-2 which is very good in my opinion. Just have to say this is all good but it doesn't really take into account others who will get injured. I think it's safe to say other Bills players will get injured in the about time frame mentioned. We are kinda of having our cake and eating it too.

He did that all too often towards the end of his Bills tenure.