Beck Water

I can sign up for my Crow Plate Special too. I don't see Sherfield as being at all the same type player as McKenzie or being asked to fill the same role. But I thought Harty would be an upgrade on what McKenzie was good at - quick slants and gadget plays, getting open against man - while also being able to run a fuller route tree. I was wrong, and I agree with you that Harty appeared to have lost the speed and quickness he showed in 2021 in NO. I disagree that Schoen and Daboll signed McKenzie because "they like him as a person". This is Daboll's 3rd season in NYC. He's definitely sitting in a hot skillet unless they win. Same for Schoen who is charged with getting Daboll the goods, and who made decisions like "pay Danny Dimes the Big Bucks". It would be stupid to sign a player just because they like him. Daboll used McKenzie very very effectively in 2020 and 2021. I suspect Schoen and scouts watched the tape to ask "is he still fast?" "Yep" and they decided he could help the team win, if used as he was in B'lo. He also returned punts and kicks for the Ponies last season, so there's that. As far as Sherfield, I think his role was to replace Kumerow on ST but be a better WR. And he was - marginally, but not by as big a margin as I thought so I will take my slice o' Crow Pie.

Agreed So it's understood that once a team is paying its QB the "Big Bucks", they only have cap space to pay 5-6 top players. My understanding was that it was usually QB, WR, LT, DE or LB (depending on defense), CB, DT. Sometimes a C has shown up there, sometimes RT instead of LT. So I was pretty surprised to poke around and learn that a couple of the top teams that are paying a QB (Dallas, KC, Rams ) are paying top cap % to a G. The Rams are paying 2 G

Agree about O'Cyrus and that having him solidify RG did help Brown a lot I'm a bit concerned about Brown after learning that he had shoulder surgery in the off-season. I just hope the rehab won't interfere with him conditioning and strength training for the season. Also concerned about the David Edwards/Conner McGovern plan at LG and C, but the Bills DO have a couple potential alternatives at C on the roster

Samuel makes a catch right at the start of the video, about 28-29 seconds in. He is wearing #1.

Indeed it did. "Abandon Smurfs" appears to be Beane's new WR scouting model.

In full context where the next thing he does is praise Burks athleticism and say he's looking forward to seeing what he does this year, "Nein" sounds like "Are you sleeping on Burks?" "No, we are not sleeping on him, we're looking forward to seeing what he can do" Kind of weird way of putting it but Hopkins is a different kind of cat

My goodness, KJ Hamler and Andy Isabella look like midgets out there.

This. McDermott needs to have a "come to Jesus" meeting with him pronto. If he demurs, Brady needs to have a chat with McDermott. This is NOT OK - "friendly fire" isn't.

Oh Hell to the Noes, it was way way way worse. Of course, the Bills had used a top-10 1st round pick not a top of the 2nd round pick, and on a QB not a WR Their draft choice was higher profile and very polarizing - had pundits saying stuff like he was a "joke of a 1st round draft pick" and that if he succeeded as a QB it would overturn the "history of math itself" or stuff to that effect.

I can really see why the Bills liked him from some of the stuff in that article - the bit about him scheduling throwing sessions at midnight on visits to LSU and FSU, and "Coleman is such a film junkie that he'd figured out a large portion of FSU's playbook before actually seeing it." One little false note: "That'll all require rapport, and they're already planning to work out this offseason at Allen's place in Wyoming. " Not that he couldn't, with what he earns, but as far as I know Josh does not have a place in Wyoming.

Very proud of your Armchair Diagnostician Certificate, aintcha? Bet you have it framed and mounted on your wall. AB has a history of erratic behavior that stretches back before college - he was expelled from FIU before he played a snap for them. He had trouble at Central Michigan showing up for meetings and practices. It seems as though numerous people at different times of his life tried to take him under their wing and help him starting with his WR coach in college and his wife and ending with Tom Brady. He may have a mental illness, he may have a medical condition that affected his brain starting in childhood and kept him from ever really learning to adult, he may have CTE. And, drug use and alcohol may well have played a role. Sitting in a chair hundreds or thousands of miles away and never having examined or tested or treated the guy, you can't possibly know what the root cause of his problems and behavior is. We do know there are plenty of guys who have taken as many hits as AB ever did or more who are far more functional.

Should it? The de-facto GM who drafted N'Keal Harry and Tyquan Thorton is gone On the other hand, Eliot Wolf, the current de-facto GM, was in NE as a consultant, then as Director of Scouting - unclear to me whether he was promoted before or after the draft. So there is that. #1 Wideout, No. #1 Receiver, Yes We have guys with potential, but they have to prove it.

Exactly. If he had all three abilities, chances are we wouldn't have just signed him for a modest contract with a bunch of incentives

Well, he can try, but it's the same principle where it took years to get people to stop calling photocopy machines "xerox"

Speed. 4.37 second 40 time. In theory makes him more able to be a deep threat.

Yeah, I left that part out. Long asked Beane who is the most under-rated player on the Bills, and he named Taron Johnson on Defense and Khalil Shakir on Offense. Definitely some major Shakir Love going down. I don't think Hollins is competing with MVS for a spot. IIRC, Beane mentioned special teams and all the leaders we lost on ST this year, and referred to Hollins as a "glue guy". I think in the past the "glue guys" have been the players who aren't the most talented, but who help keep the team energized and working together, and who grind in whatever role is needed.

You lose. But it's not the question of who is "butt hurt" or offended that's relevant, just as it wasn't the question of who was "butt hurt" or offended that's relevant. Both have the right to speak their minds. Both don't have the right to expect freedom from consequences to accompany their freedom of speech. Kaepernick provided enough credible evidence that he'd been blackballed due to his protests to obtain a settlement from the NFL. I don't expect Butker to suffer any actual consequences. But the issue is the same for both: both have the right to freedom of speech, and in both cases people can support free speech AND object to what they said. But I don't expect you to see that. I do expect you to not put words in my mouth or imagine you know what does or does not offend me. (I don't think you understand it, but you do know it's imposing and unreasonable) I wondered how long it would be before we'd get to the gratuitous personal insults. You don't disappoint. Well, actually, you do, but you don't surprise. OK I don't understand the point you're making here - in fact, I couldn't parse it at all. But that's OK.

To your "even if the bolded is true, so what?" the "so what?" is the apparent hypocrisy of the same people who are up in arms about attempts to "cancel" Butker when they found {*reasons*} why the same attempts towards Kaepernick were OK or even well justified. No one including me is arguing that Benedictine College is not a private college affiliated with the Catholic Church, so you including the definition of "Benedictine" here is beside the point. The point is, a "parochial school" is a small pond. It means literally, a school affiliated with a parish, a small organization within the Catholic church. The impact of a parish school (usually k through 8 grade) is limited. A small little cog even in the local Archdiocese which is a small cog in the Catholic Church. A Catholic university or college which has nationwide or possibly international admission, has bigger scope and is a bigger platform. That's the significant difference. You want to see it as "splitting hairs" and cap it off with some ad-hominem-ish crack about "intellectuals", Whatever. Never did see your response to my attempt to give you a serious and thoughtful response to your valid question about "why care?" - did I just miss that? Or are you just in to pick nits and not interested in the work of the knee length comb-out?

I understand the points you are making. I also have to point out the "I support free speech and hate cancel culture BUT" aspect: seems to me that every time someone wants the views a person is expressing to stop ("cancelled" in the modern lingo), they typically have "but REASONS" why this case is an exception to their free speech support. So you have your "I support ....BUT...." reasons why you feel Kaepernick was different and other people have their "I support.....BUT...." reasons like the foolishness @Bob Jones quoted lobbying to replace Butker with a female kicker SMDH. From one viewpoint they have their similarities.

I think there are times when a player is assumed to speak for a team - which is why the NFL fines players and coaches who openly criticize officiating or NFL policy. There are certainly times when players are asked to do PSAs or publicity appearances for both teams and for the NFL itself, at which times they are assumed to speak for the NFL and the NFL would rightly be held to have "skin in the game" about what they said. It's a pretty good distortion of what Butker said to frame it as "barefoot pregnant and in the kitchen", nor do I think the people who object are framing it that way (I'm certainly not). What Butker actually said was not limited to transgender. He referred to "dangerous gender ideologies", true, but he also talked about the "deadly sin sort of pride that has an entire month dedicated to it", a pretty clear reference to PRIDE month which is about LGBTQ, not simply T. If you think someone is living their life according to "dangerous ideologies" or "deadly sin", is it unreasonable to question whether you believe these people should have a right to live their lives in peace and safety in our communities?

Fair point. I'm pretty confident MVS will make the Bills, barring some trade or FA move that I don't see happening at present. Also not sure I grant the "our RB is better than Pacheco" point - in their 2 years in the league, both have similar Y/Sc and touches, but that's a nit and arguably an appreciation of a different running style. The thing is, in my post (and yours to which I responded), I was talking about the number of improvements we need to sustain an elite passing offense. KC started the year with Pat's "guy", Travis Kelce, who is elite. If I grant that our #3 and #4 WR are better than KCs, the point remains that we're going into the season without one demonstrated "freakazoid" on offense. And there's also the point that last season, KC did not have an elite passing offense until late in the season/playoffs. I believe they finished the season #6 or 8 or something for passing yards, which is great but they were #2 for attempts (!!!) and #3 for completions, which means they weren't getting a lot of y/a (#19 there). And remember that's WITH their future HOF TE on the field. I'm concerned that our passing game is not going to look like "all that and a bag of chips".

Well, he could say "one of the best" or something like that.

Wonder what Rachel Bush will have to say to them on the Twitters?

I had that impression myself. I like Kincaid. I think he has very high potential. I'm also concerned that Beane is very much following the blueprint he saw for roster building in Carolina especially with regard to the WR position

I had no idea one could "come out" as trans or have gender-affirming therapy in Iran. It is still a very conservative theocracy. I googled and officially the government does recognize transgender individuals who have undergone sex reassignment surgery, but according to my info, it's officially considered a mental disorder and there are no laws protecting trans people from discrimination or hate crimes. As a result, assault, exclusion from education and jobs are rife. Source: Iranian-born and educated woman I used to work with.