Beck Water

You know, this reminds me of when I was starting to fly all over the country as a private pilot, and I was a bit intimidated by the idea of a 1200, 1400, 2000 mile flight. I asked an experienced mentor how to do it, and he kind of looked at me as though I had beets for brains: "you just plan it as a series of 500 mile flights" There's more to it, of course - you're liable to cross more weather systems, and encounter more varied density altitudes. But fundamentally, he was right. What's my point? I dunno about a "precision offense", but the Bills absolutely do have enough offense to sustain scoring drives of 9-11 plays that go 75 yds or more. And in fact, that's pretty much what they've done when they've scored successfully, so it's what they need to make up their mind to do right now. Just take it one set of downs at a time. The only way we're going to force teams to give us the intermediate and deep throws is if we commit to that and show patience. And in fact - most of the time when we've scored, that's exactly what we've done. The Bills have scored 20 TD so far this season, and 9 of them have been long, methodical drives of 9-17 plays driving 75 yds or more. One was 75 yard in 8 plays, one was 64 yds in 9 plays. Of the others, only 2 have been quick strike length of the field in 4-5 plays drives; the others were off turnovers and some of those drives took a lot of plays to move the ball from from near midfield. Just plan it as a series of 10 yard chunks. As far as Josh "running more and not getting hit more", Josh isn't Mahomes. When he runs, he gets lathered up and craves contact. I think the Bills coaches got tired of saying to him "run but don't get hit, use your legs when you need to then slide or go OOB" . They've been saying that to him for 5 years now and Josh has been hearing "run blahblahJosh use your legs blahblahJosh". This season, he would maybe run out of bounds and slide a couple times, then start barreling into guys. So I think they finally said "listen, if you can't run nicely for a QB, don't run." Of course, then we see him body-checking LB in the endzone after the play so...

Two. Patriots have been spanked in 2 games - Cowboys and Saints. And yes, as you might expect, those games featured a lot of rush yards given up. The Patriots other 4 games have been 1 TD games. They gave up a lot of rush yards to the Dolphins though, as though they were saying "you're not gonna beat us slinging it". This may not be what you mean, but it sounds as though you're saying the Bills absolutely shouldn't lose to the Pats Again, 3 of the Pats losses have been one-score games, including Miami. The Bills better have a sound DL in the middle, and with Da'Quan Jones out they're already thin. They coped last week by playing Ed at 1TDT.

I don't remember details, but, he definitely had the ball towards the field instead of towards the sideline as running backs (and receivers who RAC) are trained to do.

You're asking a great question IMHO Flip it. What does #2 mean? I listened to this again this morning and caught this: "they have to be a little bit stubborn and patient in the running game, or they have to have a, more intricate..more plays in the short passing game" It sounds to me like what Chris Simms means is, the Bills no longer have a slot receiver that other teams fear, and scheme to take away OR That Gabe Davis lacks the NFL-level route running skills to move all around and run all the routes, like (say) Manny Sands could

LOL. Well, we didn't see him "mic'd up" if I recall.....or at the podium much for that matter. Two stories. 2021, Milano just signed a new contract. He said in an on field interview that he was trying to become more vocal on the field. (I swear I'm not making this up). The reporter asked "How do you become more vocal?" Milano: "You talk more." 2022, Hyde giving one of those puff-piece interviews Buffalo Bills PR puts out. He was asked who is the biggest trash talker on the team? "Matt Milano" Reporter reacted like Hyde was joking. Nope, Hyde was serious. He explained that if someone (Hyde for example) made the wrong call in practice, Milano would give him endless ***** about it.

You'd have to ask Simms exactly what he means by that "too reliant on Diggs" thing. Right now, Tyreek Hill has 59 targets and 814 yds for the Fins. Waddle is trailing him with 35 targets and 296 yds. Does that mean the Fins are "too reliant on Hill"? I think it means Hill is their best receiver and is very difficult to shut down in the way they're using him. While I stand by it that "#2 WR" has become the new "Franchise QB" around here, I do understand Simm's point. Gabe racks up yards because he's used deep on lower percentage throws. He doesn't seem to have the route-running chops and full route tree of a receiver like Waddle, who has been a #1 receiver in his time and who can happily take over the game and put up yards, if a team sets out to throttle down Hill. I don't think any of us see Gabe as able to do that. *** I think that last is correct, as is the "consistently" part. Different teams fill needs in different ways, but again, it's a fact that the consistent chain mover as well as the #2 guy for targets and yards was Beasley, from 2019-2021. ***Edit: Davis has certainly taken over a handful of games - notably 1 playoff game per season (2020 Colts, 2021 KC, 2022 MIA). He's also had a couple of 100 yd games, most recently 8 targets, 6 receptions against Jacksonville; 6 receptions for 93 yds against Minnesota in 2020; couple of 5 reception games against Tampa and Carolina in 2021. Just to give the man his propers. But those are like 4 games in 3 years.

#2 WR has become this decade's "Franchise QB". Remember when we used to have heated debates here about who was or was not a franchise QB on other teams? What it usually came down to, is different people had different ideas of what "franchise QB" meant, and for a sizeable proportion it meant "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it". The relevant question for anyone wishing to debate this issue is "What exactly do you mean by #2 WR? How do you define that? What traits does this #2 guy have?" After that's defined, then we can have a discussion. Fact: from 2019 to 2021, the Bills #2 receiver in targets and in yards, was Cole Beasley, a slot.

Do we love Chris Simms again, now that he agrees with what seems like a vast majority of the people posting here? He's not wrong that the passing offense has looked far too reliant on Stefon Diggs On the other hand....the Bills are a whopping 5 yards off from being a top-10 rushing team (currently 12th), WITHOUT as much contribution from Josh Allen's legs at this time (and most of his contribution did come in the first 3 games) Right now, Mahomes has more rush attempts and more rush yards than Allen....they are right next to the Bills for rushing yards. I will grant that they seem to be utilizing 2nd round rookie Rashee Rice more and relying on Kelce a bit less in the passing game. But again, similar rush yards - Mahomes more rush yards than Allen - what does Chris Simms say about the Chiefs, are they too reliant on Mahomes? AJ Brown has 60 targets and 672 yds, Devonta Smith 44 targets and 344 yards, while Hurts of course has 30% of the teams rush attempts and close to 30% of their rush yards....does that mean the Eagles are too reliant on Jalen Hurts and AJ Brown? (for context, Diggs 66 receptions 620 yds, Davis 30 targets 341 yds)

Thanks!

I don't believe this is correct. UDFA rookies still fall under the rookie wage scale. They get league minimum salary, $750k in 2023. The only negotiating points they get is their signing bonus, which is somewhere between $160 and $220k, and comes out of each team's budgeted allotment for rookies.

I would be very surprised if he goes undrafted. I would be surprised if he drops in the first round. Someone will go for talent, and bet on the league's lawyers and their own to straighten him out.

The Jets didn't have to say "No", because they knew the league office would say "No" for them. They don't want to go down the wormhole of having an annual debate with a team's ownership about the actual worth of a percentage share thus what should come off the salary cap for the player who is being compensated thus. But this is even different - Aaron Rodgers is a vested veteran who can negotiate any monetary compensation and guarantees he likes. Holding the line on the rookie wage scale is pretty critical to how teams operate in the current salary cap/free agency era. Exactly, it would lead to all sorts of headaches for the league and for the GM, trying to figure out what the actual ownership share is valued at thus what should come off the salary cap for it.

2010 #1 pick (overall) rookie Sam Bradford held out of spring OTAs and demanded an (at the time) epic deal - 6 year, $78M, $50M guaranteed. That led to the roookie wage scale, where nowadays rookies pretty much have standard deals with only a few points to negotiate. They pretty much needed this, with free agency driving 2nd contracts up. I don't think any of the owners wish to go back to the days when an unproven rookie who had yet to play a snap could shake them down for an (at the time) massive contract - not unless the salary cap and free agency operate differently. It's not about what he thinks of himself - no problem with asking for what you want. But he has to realize that there's a collective bargaining agreement, and part of that negotiation was the rookie wage scale. Which does not include ownership options. I think a team will still draft him, the same way the Bills drafted Jim Kelly. Then his choice will be, play for that team after signing the rookie wage scale contract for his draft position, or sit out.

Disguised Coverage with a Pats guest talking Week 7

I wonder if that's just the typical Belichick baloney. Seems like they always put half the team on injury report and then all but 1 of them plays.

So in the mic'd up segment with Poyer, we can see him with another DB (Lewis I think) thudding into him pre-game, then Bernard and Poyer run into each other, both before the first defensive series and before the 2nd half. You guys who have played: Why? What does this do for ya?

-dunno if it's put on for the cameras/mic but like Hyde, talks to the ball pre-game -to Williams: "you earned it" -interested seeing how the players *thud* into each other pre-game to "wake you up" -"it's a mindset! put this game on us!" -"we hit, we strap, and we talk s***! let's go!"

I have a friend who is a Patriots fan (don't judge me. he can't help it, he was born and bred in NE and he pre-dates the Brady years). When the Pats were perennially winning, but losing in the playoffs or AFCCG - say, 2009 to 2013 - he told me you could not believe the fans and media. Sooo whiny and "Chicken Little"

Fair question, though it's kind of meaningless to answer in the abstract. I would say Knox targets need to decrease by 1-2 per game until/unless his wrist heals and he fixes the dropsies. Kincaid needs more looks. Other than that, what I think we're seeing is Josh extending plays waiting for Gabe or Diggs to uncover, and sometimes forcing the ball into them and missing resulting in 2nd and 10, 3rd and 10. I think it would help a lot if he would take the open option be that Shakir, Kincaid, Cook. I think that means 1-2 less targets a game for Diggs and Davis (lets say 2 for Diggs, and 1-2 for Davis), going to Cook, Kincaid and Shakir. I don't think that would change the receptions Diggs and Davis have very much because while those balls are counted as targets to them, these are often the balls that Josh is overthrowing or dirting. They had Oliver playing 1TDT a lot - something like 50%. As the 1TDT, he's not gonna be registering a lot of tackles.

I thought @HoofHearted made a persuasive case for, in the first half, there were guys besides Diggs who were open. There were a handful of execution errors (and/or uncalled penalties), but there were a significant number of plays - almost as many as there were completions - where Josh had a different choice available to him and didn't take it. I do think, and I may be wrong, that other than Diggs our current receivers struggle to get open vs. man., and also that Dorsey likes plays that incorporate routes that work against different coverages - which is great, except when the guy who should be available isn't. Now traditionally teams haven't manned us up too much, but that was partly because if they tried, Josh killed them. If that's changed with the loss of Brown, Beasley, Sanders etc - We Better Have a Plan, and that Plan is Scheme. It's not so much the snap counts that need to change, it's the utilization. Kincaid has only been on the field 50% of the snaps of recent games. Knox, 60-76%. If Knox is going to drop 16% of his damned targets, then he needs to be targeted less. Shakir had 16, 19, and 24 snaps the last 3 games. He had 1 target per game each game and 2 receptions/3 targets overall. The question is why? Is he consistently running the right route? Is he getting open at the right time in the progressions? If the answers are yes (and I think, if they were no, his playing time would drop instead of increase) then why isn't he getting targeted vs. a doubled or tripled Diggs? If the answer is "Josh doesn't trust him" as Wood implied, then Josh needs to Get Over It or if there's a reason for mistrust, it needs to be addressed. If the answer to the "getting open" is "no", then either he needs plays that scheme him open, or he needs to sit down and give some of his snaps to someone else. Similar thing with Sherfield and Harty. It's not that the usage has to change that dramatically, but Harty is getting 10-15 snaps per game and being targeted once or twice. As far as "do we want Dorsey racking his brain on how to get them more involved?" the answer IMO is "yes",because we need answers in the quick outlet passing game. If they're good at what they're being asked to do and they're getting open, why aren't they being targeted? If they're not good at what they're being asked to do, then either plays need to be changed, or they need to sit down and give way to someone who can get it done, and whom Josh will trust to get it done. And if that someone isn't in the roster, but he's available for trade somewhere in the league, Beane needs to get 'er done.

It's usually not the same people.

FWIW, Shakir has seen steadily increasing snaps through this season. From 10% game 1, up to 32% vs Jags and 39% vs. Giants. That could just mean Kincaid is out, or it could mean the coaches are seeing positive developments for him in practice. But, his targets are not changing (1 per game) Kincaid, after 80% game one, has been holding steady at 50%.

Actually, Von, you can tame a mustang. I hadn't seen the full clip after Josh lit into Okereke. Gotta love the speed with which O'Torrence got there and inserted himself between Josh and trouble.