Einstein's Dog

Kind of the opposite though. OBJ said he would go 6 to 6 practicing and being part of the team but wouldn't go into a game until playoffs. Then he would be completely healthy when the games matter more. It's load management. The Defense is getting crushed with injuries, but the offense might go a different route. A healthy and rested Smoke and OBJ down the home stretch.

No, it's meaningless. Gabe being invited is what the team should do, and Gabe accepting is what Gabe should do. Having a connection with OBJ is what he should do regardless of what happens in the future. There is a business aspect to this and most realize it. But I don't think Gabes being there gives any indication of what they will do in the off-season. If they were able to get OBJ (for the remainder + 2023)and he did well for the 2-3 games he was active this season, the possibility of seeing if someone gave a 2nd for Gabe would be very enticing. Then for 2023 you would have Diggs, OBJ, and 1st round apprentice as the outside WR core. Nice. I like Gabe. But Beane does have to consider moves each year. And for Gabe if he did get traded, that generally means he's getting paid- and that softens the blow considerably.

And while OBJ is coming off as a diva, it does seem like he wants to play this year. And he wants to do it with a contender. Looks like OBJ might be willing to package a bargainish 2023 along with the remainder of the 2022 season. And as you mentioned above having OBJ on board would give Beane flexibility with regards to offers with G Davis. This 2023 add-on may have been the move to outmaneuver Jerry Jones!! With Von gone the team philosophy may need to get back to all out O, for large portions of the game. Blow teams out. OBJ could help in that regard. And other teams would have very little tape giving DC's nightmares.

Okay, I get it. My point on the special teams was that alone is pretty close to justifying the 6th round pick. So, it's not a terrible deal already with the potential to get better. If it doesn't get better I don't think Hines will be around next year though because he is scheduled to get over $4M. The deal was a little weird to begin with because Hines is kind of redundant to Cook. I guess they couldn't get a banger which is what I thought they could use. I guess that's why my expectations were considerably lower. Hines to me was/is a backup insurance piece to Cook. I am now on the OBJ bandwagon. IMO that could be adding a huge piece for 2023. And a teaser possibility of playoff reinforcement.

Yes, you had unfair expectations. Adjust them. It was a 6th round pick and an inactive Moss. You shouldn't be expecting much. If Hines works out be pleasantly surprised. Why are you discounting his special teams role? it counts. He's doing more than Moss did. And your over the trade because you the patience of a gnat? Great. Who are you seeing that was traded for basically a 6th round pick that is doing more? Robinson for the Jets was inactive. This is not a CMC deal. And the Bills are still looking, if there is any truth to the OBJ rumors. Might give you another chance to set unrealistic expectations to be filled in an unreasonable timeframe.

What if the Bills are offering up a deal that is for the rest of this year and next year. We don't expect much this year, hope for some playoff games. After the Superbowl, the Bills could entertain offers to move G Davis- because his situation is dicey. Move him if they can get a 2nd for him. Use a high draft pick on a WR who can be brought in as an understudy to OBJ in 2023. The contract could be incentive laden for this season. I don't know what they would offer for next year. Of course there is risk involved.

Having Cook and Hines is not being set at RB. And Hines contract is kind of expensive for what he is. Getting a free agent RB is different than saying we're set. My point was I thought it was weird you thought the consensus the last 2 years was for the Bills to get an RB in the first. Very few of the ones I saw said that. Then you said this year we're set at RB. And to me, this is the least set at RB we've been in years. Doesn't mean we'll take an RB early, just your reasoning seemed off to me.

If the resources you had followed had the past consensus being RBs, maybe you should stop following them. Or at least not refer to them as any sort of expert. The Bills had Singletary and Moss coming back on rookie contracts, while having glaring holes at DB and WR. And now you think the Bills are set at RB? With Singletary a free agent, Moss gone, Hines w a hefty price tag. Leaves only Cook.

Bass is a good kicker. He has been money since the bad rookie start. That website should make some more categories. For extra points show the post 2015 extra length ones separately. And maybe show the 50 yard plus ones as a category.

Smoke's value tonight is not in the yardage totals. Can Hoodie let a safety leave Smoke's side of the field? Not likely. Name and reputation may force Hoodies defense to have safety help on that side at all times. That forced adjustment can help others on the offense. I would like to see a WR screen to Smoke just to get him involved. Outside of that I don't expect much. Then next week, after the Jets label Smoke a decoy and go man to man we take the lid off the Sauce.

My point is that it looked like Beane did try and address the "protecting of Josh". He tried (and did) execute a plan of keeping the, finally, good playing OL from the previous year and adding a piece. It took him paying a rather large price for Bates. And he did add Saffold and Kromer. I understand you didn't like the plan from the get-go, but others did - as evidenced by the writeup in the magazine.

Beane said "it starts with protecting Josh" and he tried to keep intact the very good performing line from the end of the prior season. They spent for Bates, brought in Saffold, and hired Kromer. And while you may not have liked it, a lot of analysts did, much like this Fantasy Football Index article that had the Bills offensive line ranked as the 5th best heading into the season. The writeup says " 5. Buffalo Bills - A line that improved over the course of last season might be even a little better now. Dion Dawkins and Mitch Morse return as anchors of this unit, and they'll be fine with Spencer Brown at right tackle. It's at the guard spots where there should be some improvement. They added Rodger Saffold, and he's been a good road-grader guard for years. The Titans released him, but it was a cap-driven move; Saffold is 34 but has played at least 15 games six years in a row. At right guard, they plugged in Ryan Bates late in the year and liked how he played. The Bears tried to poach him with a four-year deal worth $17 million, buth the Bills matched the offer to keep him around."

I agree that you have outlined what was the plan. But now it needs to change. The following has happened: 1. The platoon of McKenzie and Crowder is blown apart. And Shakir does not fill the Crowder/Beas role. 2. The pass-catching RB screen game is not at the level we hoped. Not only the RBs, the connection/chemistry is not there. Josh's passes often times seem too lofted, with too much hang time, so the opposing LBs can react. Josh was much better with the darts to Beas. 3, One thing you forgot is that their plan also happened to be cost effective /cheaper (Beas at the time was thinking around $6M I believe). That large expense looks gone now. They should be able to get Beas at a discount rate. other comments I don't diss McKenzie, although he had a rough patch he's pulled out of it. I worry about our depth at slot. For the Beas is washed crowd, what exactly is washed out? Beas was not a speed guy, he is a gut it out, find the opening and dive The leaving of Beas was largely economic - see Smoke. The Bills were not going to pay what those two wanted at the time. Beas needs to make the move and call the FO, like Smoke did, to show he now understands the business side -and the Bills valuation was not an insult

Any idea how Smoke came back? Did Smoke contact the Bills? When Smoke left there seemed to be some frustration. From the looks of the press conference that looks to be old news, filed under the business side of the sport.

If I were GM I'd be strongly considering bringing back Beas for the stretch run. Seems like Beas at this point would come back cheap and healthy. Beas knows the playbook. With Crowder injured we're now thin at the slot.

Technically it is 8 points from being undefeated and 11 points from being 11-0.

To the OP, I agree, the vast amount of criticism of McD is unwarranted and kind of bizarre. I think as mentioned by others it comes from an early formed opinion that is hard to change. Kind of like the Josh detractors for so long. However, that said, I hope they do a look back on who called the final timeout with 7 seconds left. Just idiotic, call it with 3 seconds left like is done routinely and have the kick be the last play of regulation. Fix that. On the other side, i would have been upset if the Bills did what Detroit did and didn't run the ball on that third and one. I think the Bills were lucky that they stop the clock on the review and don't seem to restart it. They put back 10 seconds on the clock and didn't restart? I don't know if the Bills would have called a TO or not in that situation, probably not. Anyways, IMO, Detroit should have run the ball.

You're entering into the ridiculous territory of internet doctor now. Not all ACL tears are the same and there is no set timetable. You don't know that he is not limited. And you don't know how he is feeling afterwards and what his personal doctors are saying. Your last sentence doesn't make sense. You can ask him just about anything, but don't expect him to tell you what his personal doctors are saying.

And when you say "doctors" you mean team doctors, right? Because Tre's personal physician's opinions have not been reported. And if you read between the lines you can deduce there is a difference of opinion.

Why do you totally discount the possibility of Tre changing his mind? Seems possible to me that eventually Tre may feel his knee is up for it. And have you considered it might not be an "excuse" but an actual concern? There exists a real conflict of interest in a team doctor and a coach somehow being the party responsible for determining if Tre is ready to hit the field.

Vikings fans should be afraid. They may not be aware of the off-shoot Bills jinx - that an incredibly lucky/fluky victory over the Bills can tailspin your season (ask Arizona fans). Minn is on its way down.

Why are you assuming it HAS TO go from "push" to "shove"? Certainly a possibility is Tre will eventually feel comfortable enough to play, simple as that. He may, or may not, have psychological issues to get over. It might be he doesn't feel 100% and doesn't feel the knee is ready. And he may feel he is the best judge of when he is ready. It seems the longer he sits out, the more you will use it to justify your already concluded view.

C'mon Crowder over Beas by a mile. Beas was going off a cliff. And odds are Beas would be hurt now anyway - or playing like a cripple. I was all for a WR in round 1. I too, hope the FO tries for one next year. But for this year the FO may not be done, if they add OBJ, they may have, for the stretch run, dare I say, the best WR unit the Bills have ever had. I believe you vastly overestimate the ease of creating an excellent defensive line. Now that we finally have one, the vast majority of posters turn a blind eye to this key development.

And to add to the correction, it's really going to be hard to get that Miami loss seeing as they aren't playing this week

1. KC loses. A KC loss with a Bills win puts the Bills back in the driver seat. 2. Jets loss. Want to get the division back. 3. No more injuries...time to get more people back not lose anyone else. 4. I'd like to see more involvement of the short swing pass to the RB- Cook/Hines or even Singletary. I think this should become a staple of the O. 5. Large victory- I want to get back to crushing teams- gets the team hype and makes viewing for me less stressful.