Chaos

You don't really understand it. Its barely worth the time to explain it. But the PRP measurement is a totally objective measurement, and there is no dispute about the components going into it. As an an analogy, pretend its early in a baseball season, and some random hitter like Ty France is 20 for 40 and batting .500. And Aaron Judge is 8 for 40 and batting .200. Your concept would be "its bunk" to say Ty France has a higher batting average than Aaron Judge. It would be very simple minded to assume that someone publishing the batting average stat is claiming Ty France is a better hitter than Aaron Judge. They are just publishing a statistic.

Personally i think the thread titles should be shortened to "The Edmunds Report" and be permanently pinned on the first page. This is the most therapeutic carthatic thread on TBD. It has developed its own Zen quality as it has gone along.

PFF has a stat PRP: A formula that combines sacks, hits and hurries relative to how many times they rush the passer. This ignores win percentage. Ed Oliver ranks 16th in this stat. (ahead of Nick Bosa). Maybe this can make fans feel better. I find it helpful if people actually understand the things they are bitching about.

Inside the Numbers. Bills Top Ranked 49ers Note the big difference in win Percentage. PFF considers every down as equal. It is not a situational statistic. Top ranked team wins a lot more of the battles according to their review of the games. I can't personally confirm or deny because I don't am not going to review the games at that level of detail. But they accurately count the sacks and pressures, so it is not like their analysis does not understand sacks and pressures.

Let the final 3 seconds run off the clock. Instead of subject players pointlessly to injury risk.

That play call from Eric B. to end the half should probably get him an interview for every open HC job this offseason.

at half time, or after the game?

I have actually never seen chase young play an impressive game.

bears are going to score more than the Bills or Eagles did against the WFT

should have been a flag there

We might need to consider the talent is overrated.

Maybe Dick Butkus is running things from Heaven tonight.

Are all NFL tv commentators required by contract to declareBieniemy a genius?

So stopping the vaunted Commanders pass rush is easy?

Probably until Edmunds is an adult.

The latest bombshell to drop on this one? The Bears coaches are working with Tremaine Edmunds on getting lower when he tackles. After their $72 million investment in a middle linebacker, he needs to work at tackling. https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/bears-talent-judgment-backfiring-in-big-ways/ar-AA1hDaxB

We can watch the Chicago Edmunds vs the Washington Commanders unencumbered by a conflicting Bills game tonight.

Very sad. Great Player.

The impact of turnovers is hugely exaggerated. Bad teams lose. Bad teams have lots of turnovers. Bad teams lose because they are bad, not because they have turnovers. The situation you are discussing is an extreme example. However people underestimate the rump act of a punt. In the modern game the only difference between a punt and a turn over is average starting field position. Against the best offenses, ie Chiefs and Bills, starting field position is not a huge factor. Allen or Mahomes starting on their own 20, is more likely to result in points than Justin Fields starting at midfield.

I am not aware of anyone who posts on TBD disputes the Bills have been one of the best regular season team the last several years. (that #1 seed has been elusive, so not the actual best")

Everyone who soiled their pants over Josh only getting the team to a tie in regulation should feel embarrassed.

Every Snap Edmunds played against the Broncos. Five minutes of your life, you will never get back. https://x.com/ImBearingDown/status/1709704176949731688?s=20

About 50% of #1 seeds make it to the Super Bowl. Correlation is more likely at play than causation. Most often the #1 seed is likely the best team in the conference. But 50% of the time someone who is not a number 1 seed makes it to the Super Bowl. This happened as recently as 2021-22, when two #4 seeds played against each other in the Super Bowl. The #1 seed spot does not matter. But it is not dispositive. Side note - Mahomes has shown he can lose at home in the plaoffs.

Allen was brilliant the last three seasons. Then he injured his UCL. Then he had one bad game this year (with a 70% plus completion rate). Now he brilliant again. But now his brilliance is supported by a good oline, a much better running game, and a game plan using more play action. Same brilliant top 2 QB play, with a much better cast around him.

What are you evaluating with the “eye test”? A subjective judgement of who is the “best qb”? An objective judgement of who is the best passer? or something else?