Chaos

"Complementary football" in Bills speak, means everyone does what McDermott wants. Else it aint complimentary.

Given the complexity of the Bill's offensive scheme is hard to imagine him being ready to play for the Bills before next season.

what do you mean by "pretty damn good". Run stuffing? Getting after the passer?

if we don't blow it up, does your list change on who we should keep and who we should move on from ?

for discussion purposes, lets assume "blowing it up" means a new DC with control over scheme, playing calling and personnel. In that scenario how many current players on the Bills defense would likely be players on the defense will the new DC likely want to retain? (he might be stuck with all of them)

Every teams numbers in increased by long runs. No one is giving up exactly 4 yards a carry on every run. Not trying to provoke an argument or change the thread subject. But is your opinion that the state of the defense requires a full blown rebuild. Or do you think the fundamentally operating concepts for the defense are solid, and require just a change of a couple of players to be championhip caliber?

I think we get 8 games

The 1934 Reds surrendered 6.40 rushing yards per attempt, the worst figure in professional football history.[3] They are the only team in NFL history to surrender more than five yards per carry. The team lost 64–0 in week 8 and folded as a franchise. The team was purchased by a group of St. Louis businessmen, who played out the final three games of the Reds' schedule as the St. Louis Gunners. Now, you know the rest of the story.

More important than anything is to deflect all blame possible from the defense. The slow pace on offense is simply for that reason.

The NBA has no moral compass

He was about 18 inches Offside.

What makes you think Beane is drafting a WR better than Olave?

What are you afraid of missing out on by not having a late first round pick?

The neutral sites thing makes sense, but its not clear any of the sites you suggest have NFL caliber stadiums to host an event in.

Hypothetically if we changed coaches, and made the playoffs the next year, would you keep that new coach for 8 seasons, as long as we made the playoffs?

There is a more important open question. Vrable did pretty well with Ryan Tannehill, who was the best QB he got to coach. Maye might not have to be as good as Allen. He might only have to be meaningfully better than Tannehill to have an impact. Its hard based on anything we have seen from Maye to think he wont be better than Tannehill. The big unknown, is Vrabel the kind of coach that can capitalize on that.

You really seem to completely missing the point. The point is that changing coachesis no less likely to result in a Super Bowl appearance, than becoming the singularity of the longest lasting duo without an appearance suddenly making an appearance. From the perspective of winning a conference championship there is no incremental risk involved with changing coaches, notwithstanding the pearl clutching by some

Daboll had a lot of coaching experience including stints as an offensive coordinator before joining for the Bills. I am not sure there are formal rules for “coaching tree” but I don’t think Daboll himself would credit McDermott as his biggest influence.

10 examples of 59 super bowls is more than an ancedote. Going forward with the same QB/HC combo is actually a hope to generate the unique anecdote " the only duo to play together or more than 140 games before winning a conference championship" your list is a flawed analyis. There are a total of 10 first or second year (Rookie) Head Coaches (5) that made it to the super bowl. Don McCafferty (Baltimore Colts, Won Super Bowl V Red Miller (Denver Broncos, Lost Super Bowl XII George Seifert (San Francisco 49ers, Won Super Bowl XXIV Bill Callahan (Oakland Raiders, Lost Super Bowl XXXVII Jim Caldwell (Indianapolis Colts, Lost Super Bowl XLIV Second-Year Head Coaches (5) Ray Malavasi (Los Angeles Rams, Lost Super Bowl XIV Mike Tomlin (Pittsburgh Steelers, Won Super Bowl XLIII Jim Harbaugh (San Francisco 49ers, Lost Super Bowl XLVII Doug Pederson (Philadelphia Eagles, Won Super Bowl LII Sean McVay (Los Angeles Rams, Lost Super Bowl LIII If your suggesting "its easier for a coach to take a team that has been losing consistently to the super bowl", I will have to disagree.

Its a false choice to say changing coaches is "Blowing it up" or retaining the head coach.. There have been 10 different coaches who made it to the Super Bowl in their first or second season. The change in head coach seem to be the "change" needed in those cases. This era may have ended with the arrival of the Vrabel/Maye duo. Early returns as a Bills fan are not promising. But they are early.

The rub is a disagreement on what "winning" is. Lets say Reid retires after this season. The expectation for the next coach will be that winning means winning super bowls, as long as Mahomes is QB. Many Bills fans, who don't post on fan forums think the bar for "winning" with Josh Allen on the team is at least an appearance in the Super Bowl. If you look at the chart of the top 10, all but one of those combos won more than they lost. None are really remembered as an era of great success.

Mahomes is not better than Brady. Peyton Manning, Big Ben, got past him multiple times. Rich Gannon and Joe Flacco even got by them. Joe Burrows and the Bengals got by Mahomes. So did the Patriots.

All existing evidence supports your analysis, as far as I can tell.

Technically you are 100% correct. But from the perspective a fan forum, there are plenty of guys, who will still tell you you need to trust the process and be patient. And historically, ownerships do tend to be responsive to their customers.