FireChans

They aren’t happy because it didn’t work. That’s why coaches don’t listen to fans.

Speak for yourself. That dude in the Wolf Hat was Commander in Chief for a brief couple hours, and the WH was about to swear him in as king before they ushered them out of the Capitol.

True Socialism has never been tried. True lockdowns/mask mandates have never been tried.

Lol that’s your argument. Glad you saw how terrible it was. Thanks for playing.

Well I guess they shouldn't have started Justin Herbert, because that decision didn't win the game for them either. I guess the point is despite their record in close games, we have never been a ball-control, don't beat ourselves kind of team. I sorta get that.

Lol didn’t the NFLPA just make this happen? Who are they complaining about?

No, absolutely not.

I love analytics. I really do. I think we are seeing coaches all over the league learn from them and make better and smarter decisions. I want to know why the “analytics are king” crowd are so resistant to admit that the league wide set of numbers are not applicable to every single team or situation? Look at the NBA. EVERY team emphasizes the three. And for good reason. But every team knows that Steph Curry taking a three and some bench dude taking a three are two completely different animals in terms of probability and “good shots” and etc. why can’t we do that in football?

Counterpoint, Tommy Doyle is unplayable.

The NFL has experts on standby that tell Fox to try to not use the c word.

Brother, you are intentionally being obtuse here. “already explaining a TD is a TD” is not a rebuttal. It’s missing the point so hard, I hope it’s intentional.

A 4th down conversion alternative is a turnover. A 1st down conversion alternative is second down. Do you understand that?

Counters are slow developers my guy. So are draws. You basically said they can call these slow developing plays but they also shouldn’t call slow developing plays. Also, Daboll can’t sign a FB rn. Like most things, it’s a roster construction issue, not a scheme issue.

I don’t think you understand how bad our run blocking is. Running slower developing plays has a high chance for us to lose 4 yards in the backfield. Do you want to see Zack Moss trying to get back to the LoS on a counter? No thanks. It won’t work and it will only make our offense worse by setting us up for 2nd and 14.

The conversation is 4th down conversion vs a punt. What the ***** are you talking about? A drive where you don’t give the opponent the ball and get points would be more valuable compared to a drive where you give the opponent the ball and don’t get points.

You can’t help the interior of the line on run plays bro. They either push or get pushed. It does not matter what run scheme we do.

4 of the top 5 teams have the best QBs in football. BB, who is the best coach in NFL history, is dangerously approaching "total coward" status without Brady under center. Shocking, I say. Of course it is. Do you understand opportunity cost? If you don't convert on first down, you still have 3 more. The decision between going for it on 4th down and punting is the difference between between losing possession and not.

You can have the opinion the sky isn't blue. Have fun.

Sorry when you were talking about red zone TD's, I thought you were talking about red zone TD's.

Chargers went had 4 empty trips tonight my dude.

Just can't get it done in the redzone! 4 empty trips!

Two runs into the guards butts! Waste of downs!

I'm not the one making an insane claim. lol

Chargers should fire their OC, two runs in the red zone.

You don’t even know if Dorsey is capable as an OC. This is absurd.