Here’s something I don’t understand.
I don’t understand how 99% of people don’t agree that A. She shouldn’t have shot him with her gun and B. He shouldn’t have run from police.
If A. hadn't happened, he’d be alive. If B. hadn’t happened, he’d be alive.
So I pose this question to you all. Does anyone disagree with either of these two statements? Can we find a true TBD middle ground in this day and age?