FireChans
Community Member-
Posts
13,384 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by FireChans
-
Tyreek seeking a trade [Now: Traded to the Dolphins]
FireChans replied to Dablitzkrieg's topic in The Stadium Wall
Lmao if there’s one thing the Bills do is draft good CB’s. Wtf are you talking about They beat us in an extremely close game. And they got worse this off-season so far. who is writing them off? Maybe you forgot that in every Chiefs loss we have ever had, Tyreek has caught a 6 yard pass and taken it 50 yards. What is the point of moping about this? -
Tyreek seeking a trade [Now: Traded to the Dolphins]
FireChans replied to Dablitzkrieg's topic in The Stadium Wall
The Chiefs got worse today. This is good news. -
Tyreek seeking a trade [Now: Traded to the Dolphins]
FireChans replied to Dablitzkrieg's topic in The Stadium Wall
He’s already gone bro. -
Tyreek seeking a trade [Now: Traded to the Dolphins]
FireChans replied to Dablitzkrieg's topic in The Stadium Wall
The Chiefs two years ago decided their offense was pretty complete. They really liked a solid pass catching running back. They drafted CEH in the first. Tee Higgins went 1 pick later. Do you think today they regret taking CEH as a luxury pick? Now their #1 is JuJu. The NFL moves fast. Draft impact players at impact positions ALWAYS. -
Was Allen the top prospect on the Bills board?
FireChans replied to SoMAn's topic in The Stadium Wall
LMAO no bro. Mahomes was consistently mocked in the top 12. Just because he got picked over Watson (two picks later) doesn't make him a "reach." A reach is a prospect with a 2-3rd round grade going in the first. Josh Allen going 1st overall wouldn't have been a reach. To get pick #10 for a QB, the Chiefs traded pick #27 and next years first (21). To get to pick #7 for a QB, the Bills traded pick #12 and two second round picks (53 and 56). One of those trades is way better than the other. I'll let you figure out which is which. -
Was Allen the top prospect on the Bills board?
FireChans replied to SoMAn's topic in The Stadium Wall
Not true. Also we got hosed in that trade by falling back 17 spots -
Where the ***** have you been dude
-
The 2017 roster was a wreck that’s why it was a miracle they went to the postseason.
-
The Douggernaut will be throwing Tomlin under the bus by year one
-
Trading Edmunds makes no sense at this point
FireChans replied to bubba2018's topic in The Stadium Wall
Sign Wagner first and I’m game. -
From Dawg Pound to Bills Mafia - Browns Fans Leaving for the Bills
FireChans replied to wppete's topic in The Stadium Wall
He will stay a Browns fans, keep his tickets and cheer for Watson. -
From Dawg Pound to Bills Mafia - Browns Fans Leaving for the Bills
FireChans replied to wppete's topic in The Stadium Wall
GB continued to be the Most American Across The Pond. This man just gets it. Too few do these days. Side note, where are all the people who were pumped about player empowerment and being able to screw over franchises? Talk about a precedent set. Watson just made the Browns get on their knees and pay his sexual assault fines. ”I only like it when it happens to certain people,” amirite? -
From Dawg Pound to Bills Mafia - Browns Fans Leaving for the Bills
FireChans replied to wppete's topic in The Stadium Wall
Do those threads still exist? That scandal was outrageous. -
From Dawg Pound to Bills Mafia - Browns Fans Leaving for the Bills
FireChans replied to wppete's topic in The Stadium Wall
Their fans aren’t really going to jump ship. You know that right -
Trading Edmunds makes no sense at this point
FireChans replied to bubba2018's topic in The Stadium Wall
He won’t be under contract next season so he couldn’t be traded. -
Deshaun Watson to Browns - $230 million guaranteed
FireChans replied to Draconator's topic in The Stadium Wall
Amari Cooper. -
Deshaun Watson to Browns - $230 million guaranteed
FireChans replied to Draconator's topic in The Stadium Wall
Yeah it never worked for the Rams! -
Deshaun Watson to Browns - $230 million guaranteed
FireChans replied to Draconator's topic in The Stadium Wall
They should send Baker a thank you card for forcing the Browns to go all in on Watson -
Von may get 48 on his own. I like the over.
-
Trading Edmunds makes no sense at this point
FireChans replied to bubba2018's topic in The Stadium Wall
That was his first year. Edmunds is going into his fifth year. The Bills brass raced to pay Milano. They are letting Edmunds twist in the wind before committing to him. That should be all you need to know. -
Trading Edmunds makes no sense at this point
FireChans replied to bubba2018's topic in The Stadium Wall
Thank you. the only thing more annoying that the “haters” are the folks that can not seem to believe that Edmunds has a ton of bad plays on tape. That his negative plays are always the product of another player. Edmunds gets toasted in coverage? Well the pass rush didn’t get there. Edmunds blocked out of a run play? Well the DL got tangled up. Bites hard on play action and gets the ball tossed over his head on a crosser? Well everyone else is playing bad against the run. How many times has it been argued that Milano has suffered from a poor DL hanging him out to dry? Legitimately could be zero on TBD, because MILANO HAS A TON OF POSITIVE PLAYS. Somehow Edmunds is the only defender that is so grossly affected by poor DL play or no safety help or power run schemes or misdirection or play action. If Edmunds was a QB, he’d be Baker Mayfield today. -
Happiest two guys in Bills' defensive locker room...
FireChans replied to eball's topic in The Stadium Wall
AJ Epenesa should be buying as many McDonald's franchises as he can afford. -
Trading Edmunds makes no sense at this point
FireChans replied to bubba2018's topic in The Stadium Wall
I'm sorry, but we wouldn't be picking up his fifth year option and waiting on an extension if the Bills brass was completely enamored with his play. I don't think they hate him or think he sucks, but they aren't ready to back up the Brinks truck for him, which honestly, based on his draft status and physical gifts, they should've been. I completely agree. There are guys in the league who are playmakers and pop off the field and guys that aren't. There's a dearth of impact plays when it comes to Edmunds. If he was a 3rd rounder, he wouldn't be so routinely debated. But he was a tradeup. There are a ton of guys who don't rely entirely on their physical gifts to play football. Those guys tend to have longer careers. Guys that are really only in the league because of what they bring to the table physically tend to wash out once they start to slow down, either due to age or nagging injuries. -
Trading Edmunds makes no sense at this point
FireChans replied to bubba2018's topic in The Stadium Wall
Edmund's problems are between the ears, not physical. He's like one of those QB's that is a physical specimen, but gets happy feet or panics with pressure or can't feel the pocket etc. A position change will honestly make it worse. It's depressing in the sense that an instinctual LB should be eating offenses alive in McD's scheme. It's why Milano outperforms him every year as a much lesser athlete. When Milano picks the right gap and shoots it, he makes the play. Edmunds mostly picks the wrong gap, gets trapped in the gap, or washed out in the run. Milano in 71 games played and 54 starts has 45 TFL's. Edmunds in 61 games and starts has 26. That's ROUGH. Even SCARIER, Milano has 31 QB hits in his career. Edmunds has 15. Edmunds hit a QB ONCE last year. Some of that is based on what plays are called. But the MLB who runs a 4.5 and is the size of Gronk should be able to blitz and touch the QB more than ONCE. -
Trading Edmunds makes no sense at this point
FireChans replied to bubba2018's topic in The Stadium Wall
That’s not true and that’s silly. Edmunds is a disappointment. But he’s not the worst MLB in the NFL. If your goal is to win a Super Bowl in the next two years, you don’t create a hole at inside linebacker.
