FireChans

Shoutout Eric Striker, former UDFA legend @Jauronimo

Hey now, it's not like they do this every year!

We draft a bit too needy for my tastes, especially in terms of RB. I think we need another boundary WR in the wings. I swear to god if James Cook is a JAG I'm going to lose my mind.

Day 3 WR's is Beane's playbook.

I want Ross but the injuries will scare off Beane and Co. IMO, we need to swing on high risk high reward guys.

So then why the ***** are you bitching about trading back.

If one of those 6th round picks becomes a starting OG, or a star WR, then yes. Why are you so quick to have a take before the story is written.

Ross pls.

Because we didn’t draft Breece Hall.

Zach Wilson is going to be a problem for the Jets.

OH NO A RUNNING BACK GETTING THE BALL FROM ZACH WILSON

Go Gata

We are picking the 20s

How embarrassing this mentality is lol

They are top 5 in cap space next year.

Bills fans are biased towards the Bills. You’ve cracked the case!

Link?

Lmao they are going to drill on federal land now. Dems are toast.

DE can affect more plays. CB at best takes away half the field in any given pass play. DE can stop any given pass play from happening.

Our base defense is 3 CB’s.

Tipster and T Master aren’t the same person???

I’ve probably made my point. I was really hoping it was gonna be good Bc it was behind a paywall. Instead we got dressed up dime store analysis.

You should absolute be spending first round picks on the highest value positions (aka positions you will 100% pay if they become Pro Bowlers). That includes QB, EDGE/pass rusher, LT, CB, WR. It's why first rounders on safeties, LB's, OGs is a poor long term strategy even if the pick hits. However, this article doesn't show that, at all. It tries to make a somewhat valid point but doesn't have the legs to do so. Hilariously enough: This is completely wrong. 21 LB's have a cap hit over $4M in 22. 4 LB's with less than $4M cap hit are on rookie deals. Goes to show you why he showed the top 5 players in a graphic (not informative at all and unrelated to his point) instead of the actual data of the position . This make ZERO sense. He basically went through all the players that may not justify draft position, then said the percentage is about the same as EVERY OTHER POSITION. lmao. lol. I would barely pay 50 cents for this article. Article sucks. Not worth a dollar.

Are there any more Diamond in the rough articles from this guy? ”why it doesn’t make sense to draft a QB high in the first, exhibit A: Tom Brady.”

I mean this is hilarious. He says it 40%, similar to every 1st round pick, then judging if the second year players are going to justify fifth year options? lmao, what an analysis that is a complete waste of time when his own numbers flaunt his conclusion. Also hilarious to include a dude out of football for off the field concerns. I can’t wait for the “first round WR’s are risky” article from the Atlantic because Henry Ruggs killed someone.