Jump to content

FireChans

Community Member
  • Posts

    10,673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by FireChans

  1. I believe that’s why they signed Kirk Cousins to a major deal. To make a playoff push. FWIW, Vegas has the Falcons -120 to win the division. The only teams with better odds to win their divisions is the Chiefs and the Niners. https://www.legalsportsreport.com/odds/nfl/division/#nfc-south so yeah, you’re right. Vegas agrees. Thank you for the support.
  2. London would be the best WR on the Bills and our instant WR1. Mooney would be the best WR on the Bills and our instant WR1. Kyle Pitts has not been elite like he was supposed to be, but after a great rookie season and a disastrous year 2, he caught 50+ balls for 600+ yards. Those are Dalton Kincaid numbers. So I consider TE a wash. Bijan and Allegier vs Cook and Davis is tougher. I love Cook but gun to my head I think Bijan is more talented and I’d take him for 24. so besides that, sure we are better. Easy peasy lemon squeezy.
  3. They aren’t ranking the Falcons last year bro. They are ranking this year he also wasn’t a starter for the Falcons. He started 3 games. Tour of untruths continues.
  4. Fifth in targets, fifth in production, neither of which are #2. JAG numbers from a JAG.
  5. Lmao you said Mack Hollins was their #2 last year (he wasn’t) and he may not see the field here this year. It was the crux of your argument as to why we should be ranked higher on Sharp’s weapons ranking (which included TE) It was intentionally misleading at best. Nobody fact checked you because they assumed you wouldnt be low enough do such a thing. Dishonesty knows no bounds I suppose.
  6. Just so we’re clear, Mack Hollins was actually 5th in yards on Atlanta last year. He was also tied for 5th in catches. Jonnu Smith, a garbage TE, and Bijan Robinson, a really good RB, cleared him by a mile in receiving production. maybe it was your subjective opinion that he was second last year?
  7. I think it’s a funny nickname. I don’t have a high opinion of Mack Hollins but I’m not gonna trash the WR’s any chance I get in this thread. Let folks have their fun.
  8. That’s just your opinion of opinions. See how silly this rabbit hole gets?
  9. I promise you my dude, nobody wants the Bills WR’s to be a crappy group on paper. everyone here wants them to be awesome. If Coleman is JJ 2.0, the WR group will be good enough to my standards. If he is a normal rookie, I think this will be the weakest group since 2019 that Josh has had. I will enjoy the ride every Sunday, but there’s no reason to lie to ourselves either. I look around the league and I think the Bills are in the bottom 10 as it stands as a WR group. I pay attention to the entire NFL. Why would I pretend differently? Of what benefit is it to me? So we can all hold hands and sing about how great they are while we wait for the season to start? some folks enjoy the actual football aspect as well as being fans of the Bills. Other folks like the Bills exclusively. Neither is wrong for consuming their entertainment the way they would like, but asking folks to lie to themselves is bizarre. Are there facts about Nate or just opinions? I mean, CLAYPOOL has been shown the door by 3 franchises in 2 seasons. He’s a league minimum guy who by physical talent alone should be worth more in the league. But there can’t be facts that he’s probably gonna suck, just opinions, which are subjective. Right?
  10. It’s the same logic, yeah? We don’t know anything about Nate in 2024. Who knows if he could be great? There are no facts about him sucking, just opinions, which are subjective.
  11. Warren Sharp is a bad Bills fans too apparently. He will just never be happy. It’s about as close to a fact as you can get. The only way the WR room could get worse is if Coleman was proven mediocre commodity in the league. He is the only saving grace that he’s basically unproven. otherwise, why can’t we believe that maybe Nate Peterman can still be a franchise guy?
  12. Lmao. Here’s the definition of bias. Here’s my reasons why it’s your failure as a fan to think the WR room sucks. bad take palooza CONTINUES
  13. Tried to make it as simple and easy to understand as possible for you. Lol. I do love the idea of “dying on the hill” of reality. I know it’s hard for some to accept!
  14. Folks have memory-holed Brady’s previous OC stint.
  15. I only looked at losses because the argument at the time was that McD causes a lot of our losses in the 4th.
  16. I somehow cannot find my original post on the subject, but my methodology was: Losses where the Bills entered the 4th trailing within 1 score and did not take the lead - Josh loss Losses where the Bills were in the 4th Q with a lead - McD loss the Jets game wouldn’t count under either criteria. There aren’t many losses so it’s kinda quick and easy to go through. Games where we got our doors blown off don’t count.
  17. You may have, sure. I don’t think TBD at large would.
  18. One day when I’m not on a beach chair I’ll crunch the numbers down and go through the gauntlet for Patty, Burrow, Lamar etc. on how many times their defense lost them a lead in the fourth, how many times they overcame it vs not, and how many times they failed to take a lead in the fourth. And then I’ll ratio them all up. I think the numbers will be shocking to you. Maybe I’ll do it later. you accept your BS remark was wrong, right? Or do you commonly say bullschitt to 100% correct facts? I’ll make the point one last time for you and @GoBills808 If I polled TBD today and asked: Which number is higher: Losses where Josh Allen failed to score to take the lead in the 4th Q since 2020 Losses where the defense failed to hold a lead in the 4th Q since 2020 IMO, the vote would be OVERWHELMING for option 2. Like probably 10:1. You may have voted option 2 yourself. Now you of course know thats 100% not true. If that’s not overrating, idk what is
  19. He’s got great numbers in the fourth Q AND he doesn’t fall victim to McD bumbling the lead away nearly as much as you thought an hour ago. Point proven.
  20. I don’t know. All I know is that you are accepting it is in fact a fact. That’s all I need.
  21. It proves that Allen is overrated or McD is underrated. Probably a little of both.
  22. Way more fumble/game hombre. Wasn’t that your ratio above? .500 in playoffs means he’s the greatest playoff QB alive lmao. Aikman is laughing somewhere rn.
  23. Not under 2 minutes. In the 4th Q. we have more losses where Allen failed to get a lead in the fourth than where McD lost a lead lol.
  24. That’s a diffeeent take. anyone arguing that there’s no way that the stat is true is still wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...