FireChans

Confused by what you are trying to show me here

If the biggest example to worry about the run defense is a game we “almost lost” (read: won), in the playoffs, I’m just not that worried. I’m not the biggest fan of the Sanders pick but he doesn’t need to get us to top 5 against the run to be a success imo

Tua was a top 10 pick

Agreed. i just filed my own lawsuit against all the supermodels in the world that refuse to date me. They must be colluding,

Even better value that we didn’t trade up for him and let him come to us. Gets it closer to like 140-150

INCREDIBLE pick. love it love it love it.

What? You think Eddy is going 1t?

And because you got me on record, I will absolutely beat everyone over the head if I end up right lol

Would have been fine with a more significant trade up for Luther Burden 3. Or a smaller trade up for Harris. Would have been fine with standing pat at 56 for Shemar Turner. Waiting for the very poor attempt at a “gotcha”

I feel like you’re not really reading my posts. This feels axe-grindy. Best of luck to you and go Bills! Okay fine 60-70% lol. Is this really that hard to follow? Over under on TJ’s snap count % is set at 39%. Place your bets.

Yeah they didn’t pay him. I mean sure. If we win the Super Bowl, there’s nothing to complain about. On its face, I still think it’s bad strategy. I think it’s bad strategy to pay Saquon $20M but I guess the Eagles won the Super Bowl so hey

It was a hypothetical 80%. The point was, given three options: Taking player X at our original position who may be able to be a full time starter Taking player Y at our original position who will likely be more of a rotational piece Trading EXTRA CAPITAL to move up to take player Z who will likely be more of a rotational piece the option I like least as a draft strategy is option 3.

Did the Eagles trade up for Milton Williams? I can’t recall. I do know he wasn’t good enough to demand a second contract from them.

Not untrue, but that would make me question even more the logic of trading up for a guy to max out at 30-40% of the snaps? Just seems to me 80% of snaps is inherently more valuable than 30%.

What do you mean by that?

Because that’s what I posted about and you butted into the conversation about?

Argue the pros and cons of trading extra capital for a player who the best reasonable expectation is “rotational piece” on defense. Please and thanks.

A winning argument for bad strategy isn’t “what if it works out this time.”

To me, I don’t really care about 1t vs 3t. I think that’s very much overblown, even with Daquan Jones looking washed. You can get 1t’s anywhere. What I do NOT get is the draft strategy of giving up capital for a player who the best reasonable expectation is “rotational piece” for the next 2-3 seasons. i was a big Nolen fan. I wanted Beane to take him at 30 if he was there. I would be AGHAST if he traded this years 1 and next years 1 to get him. That’s just poor strategy. It’s fine to trade up for a BTJ when you have no WR on the roster. It would be fine to trade up for Sanders if Eddy was traded. But otherwise it just seems like bad resource management especially for a player I don’t particularly like. Jmo ofc

The post I responded to that you quoted me?

OCT is the worst starter on the OL. He was crummy in the last half of 2023 and even crummier in the first half of 2024. Played well after that until he got dogwalked in the AFCCG. But sure, future Hall of Famer lol.

1 of those players is a HoFer lol. The others are the worst player on the OL, and the backup WLB.

By the same token, Shedeur and Johnson could turn out to be steals.