Bruffalo

Just want to remind everyone that there were a bunch of people on this board who thought the game would be harder with Dalton in at QB. To them I say: LOL.

I can’t tell from the broadcast but the fact that Allen is back there for 5-6 seconds and nobody is open is so alarming. It’s either that or Brady’s scheme is so bad that it’s impossible to be open. This might be the worst WR core in the league by a huge margin. I don’t say that lightly.

I'm not gonna waste anymore time with this but that's a hell of a logical leap. Have a good one.

How is it tipping your hat? What information are you getting from "I have a plan" vs. "I have no idea what we're doing"? Because one makes you sound more confident? The fact of the matter is it probably doesn't change much whoever we have at backup safety, and if the Panthers are spending cycles gameplanning around that particular player I'd be shocked. I don't really dislike McD. It's weird that you're being so argumentative and trying to force a narrative.

Nobody said he had to tell anyone who's going to be starting, even though we're all almost positive it'll be Poyer. He doesn't have to sound like a buffoon and say "uh we don't know who we're starting yet". Saying, "we know who will step in" has the exact same effect.

McD is one of the worst media coaches, I don't know if it's nerves or what, but he constantly says weird stuff that just invites speculation.

Wentz is straight up dog water.

This is my feeling as well. He's being used for jump balls and only jump balls. Let him run a slant and use his big body to box out the CB, or a post across the field. I've praised a lot of what Brady's done but I think he's not being creative or varied enough with the WR usage. The last two games feel like evidence of that.

It's a story in the sense that he said it and it's ambiguous. I just have trouble really gleaning anything McDermott says from these injury pressers.

McD says "We'll see" for just about everything. I don't know if this is really a story. He said the same thing about activating Hairston.

I'd give them a first. You got to pay more in division obviously. It won't happen, but it'd be fun. And they should throw in McDaniel to be our passing coordinator / next up OC.

I would rather have current Terrell Owens back than Ray Ray. He was one of my least favorite Bills of the last decade, so frustrating to watch.

Maybe they should try to do different things with him besides bad jump balls on comeback and go routes. That seems to be 95% of his targets. I swear Joe Brady is allergic to slant routes.

These types of comments are so strange to me. What are you supposed to do? Storm the stadium? Start your own football league? The only recourse fans have is to have discussions like this about what could make them better. Like it or not, but this is where the Bills are at presently. There's not much a fan can do other than not watch (the old "voting with your wallet" trope). Considering this is still much better than the 17 years of slop they threw out there previously I'm inclined to continue watching, but you do you.

12-5. I think their demise is being exaggerated.

The Bills' best defensive trait right now is the line and they're now playing basically a statue at QB. If anything this helps the Bills tremendously. The secondary (read: the soft zone defense) has tons of trouble when the opposing QB is flushed out of the pocket and has to improvise. I don't see that being a strength of Andy Dalton.

I think so too, these two losses are overblown because of how frustrating they were. The Bills have serious structural problems but I think they're mostly correctable if the coaching staff can get on the same page. There's flashes in every game of what they can be, I don't think it's unreasonable to think they'll be able to adjust.

It's not worse than the drought. I don't understand how anyone could think that. I'd rather have a relevant team that I enjoy watching vs. being a dumpster fire organization that's only slightly enjoyable if you've gotten hammered and jumped through a flaming table beforehand. For a more relevant example: I'd much rather be a Leafs fan, a perpetually decent team that gets booted from the playoffs in round 1 than a Sabres fan. I don't have that luxury.

If the Bills lose this week against Carolina then the sky really is falling. Here's to hoping that the coaching staff has changed their approach on gameplanning because I think that's the main source of our woes.

I think it's more likely that Payton was looking for any reason or excuse why Wilson was hot trash on the field. It's not like he got better on any of his subsequent teams. Allen's job on the Bills is just harder than it needs to be and I imagine it's exhausting. The WRs aren't being put in position to play to their strengths and it shows. The RB room is Cook, Johnson and Davis have regressed. The Bills have been really slow to develop counter punches and they're predictable. If you have elite talent you can get away with poor situational play calling, Allen doesn't have that right now.

You ain't seen nothing yet. Just wait until they get Nate Peterman in there.

This kind of speculation leans on having a conclusion and then trying to work your way backwards to to find evidence. I don't think it's particularly useful. I don't think any of their problems are from being too emotional or not emotional enough. The playcalling has been poor and the skill position talent hasn't been good enough to overcome that, especially during high pressure moments. Allen's commercials have nothing to do with it.

Dez Bryant is available too.

Gronk, but not the good one.

Last season I think you had a pretty solid argument for Ty being the best 3rd down back in the league. He was clutch a number of times. It hasn't panned out this year. After watching some game film analysis, I think Brady came into Monday with a horrible gameplan. The personnel decisions and situational playcalling is part of it, but thematically what he was trying to do didn't make a lot of sense. He wasn't maximizing the Bills strengths or attacking Atlanta's weaknesses. That's my only problem with the "everybody eats" mantra. It should be match up dependent, and you hammer those matchups until they make you stop. One week it should be Cook blowing up gap runs (the only thing that was really working Monday, they should have done more of it), the next week Coleman has a big game against an inferior corner, etc... Trying to keep even distribution of touches within every game makes zero sense to me. It's antithetical to a gameplan, because it makes your gameplan the same every week.