Ya Digg?

These things don’t have to be mutually exclusive

I think even as a decoy he brings a lot more value than having one of the PS receivers brought up to the active roster does

To be fair they give Josh tons of love as well

Oh god can you imagine what a cesspool this place will be for 2 weeks if they lose?!?? unfortunately, some “fans” on here would be in their glory

Haha you’re funny, thinking some on here are going to enjoy the next 4 games. funny guy you!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

The last time a healthy Von faces the Chiefs he was a big time difference maker-I’m excited to see what he can do against them this time as well. Gonna need pressure on Mahomes and Von can do that

You know you could just put a period at the end of your sentence, you don’t need to spell it out. Speaking it out so many times makes you look like a douche

The Chiefs have played a season full of C games as well, I’ll take C games wins all day every day

Ahhhh the good ole “not plying like this they won’t” tired old trope…gotta love it

Cool-he sucked here

The main point I’m trying to make (and clearly not well) is that they shouldn’t be considered focal points. Brady shouldn’t be calling plays where Virgil or Shavers is the intended target. If Josh sees a matchup he likes that’s one thing, but barring even more injuries there shouldn’t be more than about 2 targets total to these guys. They’re playing a team that is terrible at covering the TE and the Bills have 2 more than capable guys. For a team that values trust so much, it would seem odd to give the PS guys much

You do know he has 3 sacks this year in only 5 games, right?

Got enough guys already to spread the ball around, don’t need to target them intentionally. If they’re wide open, then sure-but they shouldn’t be the 1st or 2nd read on any play

Don’t overthink it though if you’re Brady or Allen-none of these guys should be the first option on a play. I would much rather see Kincaid have a breakout game than these guys get targets at his expense

It’s that sad little collection of Bills fans that get to say they “win” either way. If the Bills win that’s awesome! If the Bills lose they get to say “I told you so” and to some, that’s more important than the Bills actually winning

This is about as close to an admission from the league that the refs screwed up

Actually what I love about his statement is that he never apologizes, and he has nothing to apologize for

Of course they have weaknesses, every team does, but you seem to be part of the group that looks for style wins, not just wins. If you want style wins, college football is more up your alley. I stated this earlier, let me do it again. The Chiefs have won 3 Super Bowls barely winning games that they should’ve easily won. The point is they win them. Get the win, move on to the next week. The Bills have real issues stopping the run, that has to be addressed, but playing the game of “well they won’t beat (fill in the blank) playing like that” or things similar to that are ingenuous statements

You know the Bills won right? Who cares how they won or by how much, just win the game

Well whatever it was, it was a step slower than what it used to be apparently

Yes I’m not sitting them for 2 straight weeks, that’s a terrible idea. Start them, have them play, get the game in hand then pull them-pretty much like any other game. How many times have you seen teams lose after getting a bye because they say they’re guys the final week or 2 of the season. That happens far too often

Simon answered this perfectly, that should end the thread

You mean make starters inactive? Absolutely not. Seriously an absolutely awful, terrible idea. The 2 seed is better than the 3 or 4 seed

This isn’t true at all. If he makes the extra point they don’t go for 2 so they would’ve been in the same place. Also let’s say that he did make it AND they went for 2-how do you know Miami wouldn’t have gotten a 2 point conversion after their last touchdown?