In Summary
-
Posts
884 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by In Summary
-
-
Clear PI against Giants receiver. Challenged and call withheld. NFL has no interest in reversing calls.
- 2
- 1
-
Was rooting for Indy and coach Reich. Close game.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Happy Gilmore said:
Why did Miami want to win this game? That is what I don't get.
Because they are pro athletes and have no interest in following the "plan" to tank.
- 3
-
Defense: Have to figure out a better role for Edmunds.
Offense: Allen is not a running back.
-
Just now, YoloinOhio said:
Big play Tre!!
When you don't have a Bruce Smith, you Tre.
-
I can't stop watching Edmunds.
-
No interceptions or fumbles by Allen.
- 1
-
Unlikely to see the degree of turnover the OP suggests. Next season, there will inevitably be players playing in positions that will frustrate fans. We'll talk about getting two new tackles but will end up getting one that is better and hope that is enough to stabilize the line. We'll want Ford out of the RT position but they'll either see progression or move him to guard and we'll hope they are correct. No way you blow up the roster at this point. It's continual incremental improvement at this point. Add an impactful RT, WR, and DE and you've got a substantially better team IMO.
-
51 minutes ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:
If he blames the previous admin it looks like an excuse. If he blames Beane, it strains relationships. If he blames himself, he looks incompetent.
I see it as a "we can collectively do better and need not be impulsive" statement. It's not a papal decree. Just a challenge to do better.
-
I think McDermott would fess up to Benjamin if asked directly.
-
23 minutes ago, Ramza86 said:
I like it to be honest. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesnt.
I think the reason people dont like it is because we arent using it as a luxury.
Like...if this offense could show it can march up the field naturally without plays like this youd love it when it works.
Maybe Daboll doesn't believe this team can (?) which would be a shame. However, I can believe that Daboll just went to the well one to many times and got slapped into reality regarding who should be running the ball.
-
Hypnotizing stutter step.
-
IMO, it's really just the teams with a franchise/reliable starter QB that can afford to trade away picks IAW the article's main points. Otherwise, picks are still coveted as a team stockpiles them to draft at the top.
- 1
-
The narrative persists in part because we didn't throttle the Dolphins.
-
3 hours ago, Wilton Bills said:
The all blue is slightly better than than all red, which is awful!
Blue >> Red
-
-
16 hours ago, JaCrispy said:
No CB is worth that imo
I so agree. Only give two 1st round picks for a QB and only because of the absolute necessity of having a top 16 QB if you want to be a contender. Poor use a draft capital by LA IMO.
-
On 10/13/2019 at 1:08 AM, WhoTom said:
Pre: I turn it on 2-3 minutes before kickoff.
Halftime show: I might watch just to see scores and highlights from other games, but I'm usually doing something else at the time.
Post: Nope. I turn it off as soon as it's over.
Then go to YouTube a few hours later and watch the 8-10 minute highlight clip put out by the NFL..........free of needless commentary.
-
No. OTs are rare enough that I prefer not to have a carnival game decide the winner.
- 1
- 1
-
Does Perry have the ability to contribute as a runner if called upon?
-
I'm happy that the GM/Coach can admit when they don't hit on a draft pick. Now I'm wondering if Beane will still fall in love with certain prospects and continue to bundle picks and trade up?
-Zay was a good guy so of course, best of luck.
-
Giving up draft capital would be the reason we don't get one or more Knox, Oliver, Singletary, Sweeney type players next year. Not feeling it.
-
Versatility in offensive linemen.
- 5
- 2
-
Beautiful Duke!
MNF: Cowboys at Giants
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Dallas will be a challenging road game.