JDHillFan

As seen by observances around the world, Kirk most certainly had an audience. I suspect most of his audience gave him more than 5 minutes to make a determination on his thoughts, unlike you. Nobody argues the fact that American universities are overwhelmingly liberal in their political leanings. Some apparently want to dispute that this means anything. Those people would be liberals. Laughable.

Can you share any posts agreeing with Bondi on this matter? You have stated “many here”. Should be easy.

To continue down the ridiculous path you are taking, how do we know the students aren’t listening to left-wing videos and podcasts? We don’t. It’s senseless speculation. You want to draw an equivalence between a one-time campus speaker and full-time faculty messaging over a course of years. Go for it. You got an “awesome” reaction from Redhawk. That should scare you. I notice you didn’t react to the latest venom from bullbuchanan. Your brand of straight-shooting sucks. It’s only straight when viewed through a political lens.

You attempted to draw an equivalence. A really dumb one. Not worth an answer.

It’s fine with me if you wish to compare the impact of someone speaking on campus perhaps once in a student’s lifetime to the daily influence of faculty. It’s obviously a very dumb thing to do but you are now off your soapbox and back into partisan mode. Have at it.

Good for you. Nobody can ever take that sort of fulfillment from you. I believe it was an abomination. One that dispersed when people got hungry. You are obsessed with something nobody bats an eye at anymore. See the results of the last election which you declared was lost by the thinnest of margins. One has to ignore the clean sweep of the swing states to believe that, but I’m sure it’s your version of straight-shooting. It’s why you immediately react to someone shooting into a crowd of Colorado Jews with “not as bad as Jan 6”. Looking forward to your reply to bullbuchanan. You can do it!

I agree with you regarding the “anti-American” part. It’s hyperbole in my estimation. Your belief that 18yo’s who don’t know sh*t about life show up on campus and are somehow immune to the messaging they get from faculty that is OVERWHELMINGLY liberal, is nonsense.

Those comments were very bad. In all your tsk-tsking , you let them slide right on by. There’s a reason for that. Here are my thoughts on J6 and people that believe it to be worse than 9/11. That might not apply to you, but it does to the goof that goes by the handle Joe Ferguson Forever. It wasn’t something Mr Straight Shooter saw fit to comment on.

It’s got nothing to do with being wrapped up in politics. You are pretending that 18yo’s with no meaningful life experience show up on campus already firm in their beliefs and cannot be swayed by the constant messaging of those in charge of the learning environment. That’s just strange.

I am not cheering on the thought police but if people are paying a price for sociopathic comments, that’s on them. It was a choice they made. Thank you for asking about who is cheering it here. See below. Not a single negative word or reaction to any of this from you, the no BS straight shooter in real life. By your own admission you are not social media involved. That’s good but it also makes you oblivious to the modern world and the level of venom out there regarding Kirk. Also by your own admission you didn’t know who he was but you spent 5 minutes looking into him and that was enough to issue your judgement. Good for you. Bottom line - you are an ultra-partisan and your admonitions for everyone to settle down aren’t worth sh*t if they aren’t compliant with your own actions and inactions.

See what I mean about your usual BS? If I may quote you directly:

Younger people are impressionable. That’s not news. Those teaching and counseling them at American universities are OVERWHELMINGLY democrat/liberal. How is this a mystery to you?

Why haven’t you started a thread about it? We can discuss it without getting bogged down in the usual bs that outrages you minute by minute.

Yet you don’t have it in you to say this directly to those people on an anonymous message board. Weird.

Bondi 👎

So the label is specifically for gay men you disagree with politically. That’s interesting!

Agree. One of my favorites is your classic about the hate-filled homophobic soccer mom’s for liberty. You were especially unhinged there when you went by billstime. 250 posts or thereabouts. You seem to have lost interest in your post-transition. Zero posts. Good for you!

This young liberal actress is what Frankish would call self-hating. It’s possible he only describes gay men that he disagrees with politically as self-hating, but I doubt it.

Only you. The straight shooter in real life that’s afraid to call out one of his own on an anonymous forum.

She’s an embarrassment. Feel better? A white republican version of Jasmine Crockett.

Your soapbox has been safely stored away it seems. Bad maga, bad!

I don’t know the who, but I can offer something about the why. There are people in the world that think like this person: A post this grotesque is based on politics. The sign in the meme speaks to the matter. The grotesque post above was met with a simple “how do you know this” by you. That’s pathetic.

You are absolutely right. For being absolutely right in this instance, there are people that will call you a hate-filled bigot. That’s something, isn’t it?

Probably not. Good on him. Should employers subject their business to unhinged employees that embarrass them in a very public way celebrating the murder of someone? Just because they didn’t like what he had to say? Are you upset that Trump is not handling the death of Charlie Kirk properly?

Debunking of this horseshit you are trying to peddle as done by a very online lefty. At least you got a green check from Chigoose. 🤦🏻🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♂️