JDHillFan

Sadly what the democrats were able to muster as a candidate was simply too awful. Look within, highlander.

Now that people know he is making 8M/day for DOGE activities there will be outrage!! Thank you for bringing this to light! incredible work 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻

Many people have observed the guy long enough to know what he’s about. Then there’s your type. I’m sure “day one” is fun for you as a talking point, no matter how vapid. You are morphing into a Tiberius. That’s something no one can, nor would want to, take from you. Well done.

I’m sure he does a good job on behalf of his district.

I understand that LoTT can be quite triggering to certain people so I’m including a link from the local NBC affiliate. https://www.whec.com/top-news/penfield-parents-clash-over-appropriateness-of-lgbt-book-the-rainbow-parade-for-elementary-students/ I’m going out on a limb here and saying this is NOT an 80/20 issue. Closer to 98/2 issue. The roundy’s of the world are on the 2 side. I know it was unnecessary to state that.

In your attempted dunk on gqp maggats about fraudulent spending you stated that dems had controlled only 4 of the last 16 sessions. All you had to do was say “I’m including this years budget that’s a work in progress and next year’s that is a fantasy at this point”. As it is, the numbers you put out qualify as the dreaded “disinformation”. That’s your fault. Just get it right next time.

Frankish or C-section will be along shortly to explain why that’s funny.

Who would say something so idiotic and why? This is an argument you are making in favor of yourself? That’s effing absurd. I’m genuinely sorry that you hit submit reply on this.

That wasn’t so hard was it? Odd timing on their payroll issue. It happens.

It was about your words. They were wrong. When dunking, it’s critical that one have their sh*t together. You failed miserably.

I honestly thought things would be a little more measured from the resistance this time around. I couldn’t have been more wrong. Wild times.

Are you sure? Just to revisit my original question that you don’t like - do you believe the financial fortunes of Politico Pro and Politico to be intertwined or not? It’s not a hard question.

Good heavens. The last 16 sessions, by any use of the language, include 8 during the Obama era, 4 during Agent Orange 1.0, and 4 during the tenure of the “spry for his age” President Brandon. The esteemed speaker for two years during each of those era’s was Aunt Nan, the wine lover from SF.

You said that democrats only controlled (read carefully now) 4 of the last 16 sessions. That is the opposite of factual.

You didn’t remotely address the question I posed. Why not? I’m fine with useful subscriptions. I suspect the number of subscriptions and the dollar amount may have been on the high side.

Your original statement was not factual, it was wrong. You have a habit of making wrong statements and then twisting yourself into knots to make it look like you were right. Think “a movement of 1 million American nazis” or your disastrous takes on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The one thing you will not do, is own up to it when you vomit inaccurate information.

Is it your contention that the funds politico received for politico pro are somehow kept separate? The financial prospects of the “news” side and the “pro” side are not intertwined?

It’s not accurate or factual. You stated that democrats have had control for only 4 of the last 16 sessions. That’s inaccurate and fact-free and you were trying to dunk on “maggats” with it. Very weak. The premise wasn’t good. It sucked. You are whining that people are picking on “fraud/waste/corruption from democrats” as you phrased it. You’re wrong. It’s not fraud/waste/corruption from democrats. It’s from government entities in general. How is that difficult to comprehend? It just so happens that it’s democrats that are showing themselves to be very upset about it all. Very unusual. They must have a reason. You are under the impression that because people generally hate democrats right now that they support republicans and past republican malfeasance. You couldn’t be more off the mark.

You got the numbers wrong. It’s ok to admit it.

Peace? Awful. Why can’t we just continue with the killing?

Yeah, the GQP looks bad because the dems are putting an attention-starved 80yo in charge of rapid response. The Dems look like the sane ones here.

Are you absolutely certain about 12-4? You’ve said it twice now. 3 strikes and… please don’t say your numbers hinge on the current congressional session. That would be rather disingenuous don’t you think? You like to post with an air of authority. It’s incumbent on you to get it right.

Before going after the maggats (clever!), make sure you have your numbers right. I wouldn’t want you to look silly.

None of it was funny, clever, interesting, or edgy at the time, but I certainly support you running it back. Best of luck!

The Dem comeback is on!