JDHillFan

At least you are being rational. To quote you - LMAO

Lmao all you want. Would you have any interest in a wager on the powerful S Bannon’s claim of TRUMP 2028? If TRUMP serves another term, I will double whatever donation you make to a “progressive” cause. If he doesn’t, you just go away. Won’t cost you a cent.

You spent a good deal of energy in mocking a murdered person as no more than a podcaster. Now you are pearl clutching over Steve Bannon - a “powerful” Trump ally. Love it.

Chuck, in his dotage, has decided to go edgy. Forced profanity is certainly on the list of things considered “cringe”. Embarrassing. “now hold on just a minute!” -Frankish

OH NO! Who will think of the presidential cats? So painful!

To toy with the gullible Nedboi’s and roundy’s of the world. Nobody gives a sh*t about what Steve Bannon is putting out there. You guys should BILLIEVE though. Do you recall when your undies were bunched up over saber rattling towards Greenland? Same scenario at play here.

OH NO!!!

You have that wrong. I very much want you to believe him. I can’t emphasize that enough.

Damn him! It’s all so upsetting and hurtful. I don’t see how any of us move past this travesty. How are your emotions? Still running hot? Hang in there.

Moral - and I hope you’re sitting down for this one…never trust a politician

Andy1 and partner leaping into action. It’s so painful!

The King of Homoerotica. It’s got a ring to it.

Sounds like you don’t want to be thought of as the board‘s expert on all things homoerotic.

You are the board’s expert on all things homoerotic. I defer to you.

I like chicken but chicken sausage is not really my thing. Not judging anyone that feels differently.

https://x.com/polltracker2024/status/1981173683449450697?s=46&t=m9ymghRhnmwx_2PyTkQGCw now he’s finished

Therein lies the problem. I don’t want to discourage you, but at your age I don’t see it ever happening. At least you have company with c-section.

I am always open to improvement. Can you point them out?

I think I owe you an apology. When you said “I am waiting for you first ever humorous response.” (let’s ignore the 4th&long-like grammatical error) was that an indication that your responses in this thread were supposed to be humorous? That got past me completely. That’s really more on you than me, but I apologize nonetheless.

You are dipping into c-section territory. Just call me anus man and get on with it. I have a daughter and granddaughter. I would rather they not have to go against men athletically or in the restroom. I just don’t have anything edgy to share on the topic. I’m obviously very angry.

You’ve now spent a small part of your day taking up for men in their desire to compete against women in weightlifting. Apparently because the women can be seen as unattractive. I bet you never saw that coming. Carry on!

I don’t watch men’s powerlifting either. I also don’t watch college volleyball or high school track. Since most people don’t watch those things it’s apparently OK for men to dominate the women in those endeavors as well. It’s a simple matter of fairness. That you would brush that off in order to own the “right wing men” is good for you I guess. is there anything about the actual ruling that you are a fan of?

Edgy. I think. What is your favorite part about the Minnesota Supreme Court ruling that men should be able to beat women in powerlifting competitions?

Ok. I own the crime of posting a tweet that subsequently was posted again. While I’m willing to do penance, I will also point out that this happens every single day here from people on both sides of the political divide. Do you feel better now that I’ve owned it? are you willing to share your reasons for never commenting on the angry posting of young Billstime/Homelander? I like to stay abreast of current events. That’s neither an abnormal nor angry position. I am willing to do it in a way that you see as most appropriate. What would that be?