I don’t necessarily assume that. When it’s someone disingenuous doing the posting, someone that has described himself as fiercely independent but who reliably takes the democrat position, I think it’s ok to play devils advocate.
Which side am I on? The one that can acknowledge how the current situation started without the use of “ “?
A response worthy of Roundybout. You’re doing great.
I will donate to the international charity of your choice if you can find an instance of me “defending Bibi starving children”. Unhinged response. Your use of “ “ as part of “started it” was equally ignorant.
Why are people on your side of the political aisle (as seen here) so overwrought and dramatic whenever they are in disagreement? It’s embarrassing.
The only thing reliable about the mainstream media is your defense of them. That’s great that you answered without mentioning their bullsh*t story from earlier this week.
But catturd!!
Wrong thread. This one is for making fun of the delusional title you chose.
Did you see the reliable Paper of Record sh*t on themselves this week with the sad story of the Palestinian child? They really effed that one up but at least they owned up to it on their subtwitter account that has a fraction of the followers.
They nailed that Minnesota story though.