JDHillFan

It’s not a crisis. It’s a simply a matter of common sense and what’s right and wrong for women and girls. Some people prefer to put the needs of biological men ahead of women because it makes them feel moral. Think 80/20 except make it 98/2.

No

Nobody that thought Edith Bunker played video games has clue 1 about the 70s.

As per one of your posts, you thought Edith Bunker played video games. You don’t know sh*t about life in the 70s. That’s ok, but please don’t pretend that you do.

Confirmation that your post I commented on is drivel. Perfect.

Seems implausible. On the other hand, it was a forecast of an order. No order currently exists.

Trans wasn’t an issue back then. Outside of Renee Richards it was a non-story. One similarity between then and now - having a man competing against women was rightly seen as absurd and wrong. You may return to your regularly scheduled virtue signaling.

I trusted the border crossing numbers when Biden was president and didn’t like them at all. You? I trust the border crossing numbers under Trump and like them. You? You seem to be suggesting that border crossings are not down in a significant way. Anything you can share that would indicate you are correct? Otherwise your post is drivel. Perfect.

Transwomen are women. Cope and seethe. - roundy

You appear to be a next-level thinker. For those of us that aspire to the same, can you explain how this post relates to Joe Biden’s glorious reign? I am admittedly struggling. Thank you for your consideration.

This would be something. also - something about eggs, Day 1, FAA, and billionaires.

Next up - defending the IRS as the good guys. Should be fun. For?

Break it down and Build Back Better.

Easy now. You seem to be coming a touch unwound. I’m on board with humanitarian assistance. I suspect a majority are. You are free to turn every discussion into something about billionaires if that’s what does it for you. You left out hegemony. And to think one of your idiotic takes in the balloon thread was “the world doesn’t revolve around us”. Suffering of thousands! So ominous! So melodramatic. Good lord.

No. That would essentially be business as usual and no meaningful change would be affected. I’m fine with it being torn down to the studs. It won’t all be pretty. I wish people would include in their tweets what medicine is expiring and the dates of expiration. That way we could eliminate some hysteria.

Sure. You’ve hit the nail on the head. Truly brilliant.

I am on board with USAID delivering food, water, and medicine to those in need. I suspect that would be the 80 in the 80/20 proposition that’s trendy right now. All the other nonsense that makes up the 20 position that someone like you would support, can go.

You focus on that, and I will focus on the absurd use of funds in Washington and hope that a boatload of it gets dealt with. I’m good with seeing how it plays out. Others that rail incessantly about the gqp, elawn, fawks news, etc (I can’t believe you find those clever, super lame) can carry on as normal.

No idea at all. Seems unnecessary. For me, that’s barely part of the equation. Rooting out decades of malfeasance brought on by all of Washington both D and R is what interests me. That the matter is being driven by Trump and Musk is what bothers many, more so than the waste, fraud, and corruption. That’s weird to me. To a deep thinker like yourself that makes me nothing more than a “fanboi”. So be it.

That’s some deep thinking. 🤦🏻🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♂️ All you had to do was say yes.

The reason a rando, or maybe even a manager in the state department purchasing organization would make the change is because even though nothing untoward has occurred, the appearance of impropriety is there. That’s typically to be avoided in government contract work and the ethics ostensibly found therein.

How much sway do you think the bad orange man had in the state department in December? Blinken lending him an ear? Modifying purchase orders because that’s what Trump wanted? At least you have agreed that Maddow misled her viewers.

She spread misinformation by allowing her brain addled viewers to believe this is something that just occurred rather than something that started under the previous administration. Plain enough? You should say please next time.