JDHillFan

lol can you believe democrats sh*t the bed so badly as to lose to Trump TWICE? And now we have no more elections! good heavens

He/she/they comes off as a hybrid billstime/tibs. That’s not good.

And you choose to express your opinion like an overwrought schoolgirl. No big deal. It’s your right and you have plenty of company here. It’s just lame.

Sorry about the use of rage. Allow me to re-word - upset enough to do something other than whine on a message board?

Upset enough to do something other than rage on a message board?

I don’t know if anyone has the answer to your last question as of yet. In the absence of a negotiated peace, is your position that the US should supply weapons and money in perpetuity?

You seem upset. So much so that your post is incomprehensible. Oh well.

If one has supported Ukraine up to this point (a lot of good it does for the people of Ukraine when Average Joe American declares his/her/their support), are they required to support it in perpetuity? Can the longtime supporter step back, recognize Ukraine cannot win, and now prefer a negotiated peace? Is that ok?

I’m just glad a sane, sober, rational lefty has finally arrived. Good god. 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻🤦🏻‍♀️

Possibly your finest post yet. Witty, yet packs a punch. More please.

The war started three years ago and “they’re working on it” is an acceptable response? Why have our European allies been so willing to have us shoulder the load for three years? As allies, shouldn’t they have done more to help?

Solid point from SAS

As our allies, shouldn’t they have shared more of the burden all along? Why would our allies so willingly let America shoulder the load? All the while our allies have spent more on Russian oil than they have on defense of Ukraine. Another Biden failure. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/24/eu-spends-more-russian-oil-gas-than-financial-aid-ukraine-report In the calendar year 2024, the EU spent 39% more on Russian fossil fuel imports than it set aside for Ukraine. The aid figure does not include military or humanitarian contributions. Vaibhav Raghunandan, an analyst at Crea and coauthor of the report, said: “Purchasing Russian fossil fuels is, quite plainly, akin to sending financial aid to the Kremlin and enabling its invasion.

NTSB is lying to us to protect TRUMP and President MUSK. Right?

Thoughts from the peanut gallery?

No doubt. Overwrought hyperbole is what you do. See the title of this thread for proof.

That’s the spirit! You’ve got this! Only 46.5 months to go.

No. You?

The time for that was 11/5/24. Epic failure. You seem angrier by the day. Try to remember that you don’t care and that you are just laughing every day. That part is not shining through. Hang in there buddy!

The 5% being let go are undoubtedly all critical technical staff. The remaining 95% will have to run with the ball. There will be zero instances this year where someone utters “if only we had more weather experts”.

Agreed. The coaches do not have the benefit of billions of dollars of space technology to assist them. The shat upon government employees will need to work smarter, not harder and do more with less. Kind of like the private sector is generally required to do. That is undoubtedly lost on a government employee that spent a good chunk of his/her/their last two weeks on the internet. There has never been an instance where someone declared “if only we had more NOAA employees, this never would have happened”.

Based on this thread I move that Just Jack change his name to Simple Jack.

Has someone suggested that a 5% cut results in only one person available per task? That’s not a specious argument, it’s a dumb one. How many is the right number of employees? Just more? I guess if the Bills and Sabres just had more coaches they could get over their shortcomings. Can’t believe they haven’t thought of that.

Can someone say why the guy Tapper is quoting is wrong?