JDHillFan

This is FANTASTIC!! Being an ultra partisan doesn’t mean you have to make yourself look like a dipsh*t. Please slow down and stop doing this to yourself. It’s embarrassing.

You stated that Rolling Stone is a very good source. The link I providedshowed you that it’s not. They are as unreliable and biased,as they come. It’s OK if you want to believe what they write despite their lack of credibility.

FEAR THE PROJECT!!

I truly hope he is willing to explain the mechanism of the television lead-in that includes a six hour gap between shows. GOOD HEAVENS!

Are you saying that when the Kimmel show wrapped up on a nightly basis good morning America started right behind it? Or is there a several hour gap lead-in that I am not familiar with? Hard to believe you hit send on that. regarding the profitability of the Kimmel show that you want to imagine is real –it was reported that Colbert was losing 40 million a year. I’m sure Kimmel was raking it in. you are out of your depth

What morning show do you believe was the beneficiary of a Kimmel lead-in? Should be an easy one to answer unless you are out of your depth.

You’ve been trolled. Nicholson meme ALWAYS means serious business. sigh

I wonder if there is such a thing as a Brian Stelter fan. Maybe some effeminate guys out there that enjoy what he does. who knows.

Reminiscent of when you claimed Project Liberal was an economic think tank. You have no idea what you are talking about unless you are trying to redefine “very good source for media”. Embarrassing. https://adfontesmedia.com/rolling-stone-bias-and-reliability/

In a prior post you stated it was “probably profitable”. Any basis for that other than your hopes? Lead in for a morning show, huh? 🤦🏻

Easy enough to see why he appeals to you.

The Democrats need more people like you out front leading the charge. let me know if you ever decide to run for office or just become an influencer. I will provide some financial backing.

If by arguably true you mean completely false, I agree with you. I also agree that the FCC should not have put their thumb on the scale here. arguably true = alternative facts. Laughable.

Learn to spell it first.

Let’s not quote you on that and just go to what she had to say: Carano fell under heavy criticism after she posted that "Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors…. even by children." The actor continued to say, "Because history is edited, most people today don't realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views?" https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/gina-carano-fired-from-mandalorian-after-social-media-post not mentioned - republican

It’s easy enough to understand why people would be interested in what Olbermann has to say for trainwreck type reasons. Can you imagine the kind of person that actually likes the guy?

🚨 BREAKING NEWS FROM TIBERIUS 🚨

“De-platforming works. There you have it. Good things can happen” fantastic

I don’t like how this matter has gone down with the involvement of the FCC. Doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy the karma involved. Imagine a grown man crying over an election (Chigoose - I know how you struggled but I’m not referring to you at the moment). This poor “comedian”! All my best, big guy!!

Do you remember when you held the position that Twitter shutting down the New York Post over the Hunter laptop story was not really censorship because people were hearing about the story anyway? If not, I’ll be happy to dig it up. It was nearly as absurd as your human trafficking routine.

Gosh. When you put it like that it all seems arguably true! good god

How is it arguably true? Can you spell it out in any detail at all?

Non sequitur

Do not underestimate the republicans ability to eff it up. I beg you.