Biden is Mentally Fit

You’re triggered!!

So, no thoughts. Smart.

You crushed it here. Any updated thoughts?

Nobody is stopping you from being a bootlicker for the free press. Thank you for not calling them honest. That would be too much even for you.

You made more sense when you were defending the cross-country adventure of chinaballoon.

https://www.insider.com/straight-man-wife-bisexual-daughter-transgender-*****-family-2023-2

I read it and read Post articles when they look interesting but they pissed their credibility away and did it willfully. Without credibility, what’s left? Part of the problem with advocacy journalism. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/11/16/washington-post-steele-dossier-newspaper-record-transparency-522733 So when reporters uncover new information that undermines earlier copy, they write new stories, updating the record. What they don’t do is go back and erase the original, flawed version. But that’s what the Washington Post did last week. As Post journalist Paul Farhi reported last Friday, the newspaper removed from its archives two stories from 2017 and 2019 related to the controversial Steele dossier and replaced them with new articles that added and deleted whole sections

Good on Omar for putting Pete the Wonder Boy on notice. Now about all that antisemitism and the 9/11 “some people did something” remarks she traffics in…

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/550006-commentators-blast-washington-post-fact-check-on-tim-scott/ Once the post goes all in on this sort of “journalism” what’s the point of giving them the click? Don’t they also employ Taylor Lorenz? It’s easy for you to declare it fair but how would anyone else know?

Time will tell.

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/biden-shields-mohammed-bin-salman-justice-rcna57972 It is a shame that our current leader, a decent man, decided he couldn’t correct a wrong.

https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/government/mineta-bio.html This is what good looks like. A democrat who was eminently qualified for the position, unlike the inept mayor of South Bend. Chao? Who cares. Now that we know what good looks like, perhaps someone will step up to the plate and tell us why Pete was a good choice for the job and why he has been a good Sec even if he’s not in Mineta’s league. Maybe that person can do so without name calling, gifs, memes, or TDS on display. Unlikely, I know.

Still waiting for the “spy balloons are ok” crew to weigh in on the latest. I imagine it will be awhile.

Allow me to comment in a fashion you should be very familiar with: you support the murderous Xi and should move to China. Do you see how childish and pitiful that is? Rhetorical question.

Imagine awaiting more data. Several European nations - “we may have a potential problem so while we await data all you thirty and under people should hold off or be very choosy about your vax supplier” redhawk - “anyone that doesn’t get repeated boosters is stupid and selfish” Different strokes.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/all/short_news/sweden-against-giving-eu-approved-covid-jab-to-under-30s/ Several European countries also recommended against the Moderna vaccine for under age 30 people. The vaccine still offered protection against severe illness and death, according to you and many others. Are the scientists and experts in those countries stupid and selfish? Just bad at science? Uncaring?

Cut and paste - In short order you have gone from dismay over those that won’t follow your preferred booster schedule to defending those that undercut vaccine acceptance based solely on your political preferences.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/12/politics/lake-huron-high-altitude-object/index.html euphemism for shot down

wtf is going on? Can one of the “it’s ok for our adversaries to fly balloons over the country from coast to coast” crowd weigh in here? There were several of you. Hopefully one of you will step up.

https://apnews.com/article/health-election-2020-donald-trump-elections-virus-outbreak-8790eda23e94aec7cf7b4beaaa67ceaf NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump is escalating his promise for a coronavirus vaccinebefore Election Day. But across America, Democrats, independents and even some Republicans do not trust his administration to produce a safe and effective vaccine on such an aggressive timeline. Such hesitancy threatens to exacerbate the public health risk for millions of Americans whenever a vaccine is released. With the Nov. 3 election fast approaching, Democratic officials face a delicate political challenge. Should they attack Trump’s vaccine claims too aggressively, Democrats risk further undermining public confidence in a possible lifesaving medicine while looking as though they are rooting against a potential cure. But if they don’t push back, it makes it easier for Trump to use the real or imagined prospect of a vaccine to boost his reelection campaign. ”no” - redhawk

Stay with the conversation please. Your claim that Biden and Harris did not undercut vaccine acceptance, which is ridiculous on its face, is based on scientific consensus? You expect even a redstate hillbilly to buy that? Come on man!

You have put politics first here and will go down swinging trying to say otherwise. That’s what many have done and it’s been a huge problem. Thanks for dropping the kn95.

To repeat - In short order you have gone from dismay over those that won’t follow your preferred booster schedule to defending those that undercut vaccine acceptance based solely on your political preferences. Do you see why people take issue?

Seems clear that the statement undermined vaccine acceptance. I understand fully why you will not be able to say as much. In short order you have gone from dismay over those that won’t follow your preferred booster schedule to defending those that undercut vaccine acceptance based solely on your political preferences. Do you see why people take issue?