JDHillFan

Last I heard is that the law applies equally regardless of political affiliation.

You have been very invested in this election. What else can explain “mentally fit” and “where’s this word salad people are talking about”? Hope it works out for you. It’s a lesser of two evils. Obviously.

He’s weak and embarrassing too. It’s not hard to say. It’s nice that you have Kamala’s back here at PPP. She’s earned it!

If we reduce the power of the office we won’t be able to call candidates Hitler. Where’s the fun in that?

Weak and embarrassing

Probably less than you. It is what it is.

Of course you don’t. Also, who is we? I wonder if those people and small business owners still impacted care. And you think you can determine the quality of a person based on where they stand on free school lunch for all. Embarrassing.

It will certainly be interesting to see how the various models and pollsters perform. This one-time favorite of the now-absent backintheday544 (that idiotic groping thread he created must have embarrassed him) has Trump at 53-47 likelihood of winning. Oct 23 was 50-50. September 18 was 64-36 for Harris. I think that’s when backintheday liked it. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/

Young roundy has made his position clear. It wasn’t THAT many buildings that were torched and they’ve all been built back better. Plus it was FOUR YEARS AGO. https://www.startribune.com/lake-street-progress-redevelopment-george-floyd-riots/600364728 He’s right if you ignore the part about “years of work remain”.

Simmer on down a notch, dumplin’. The NFL MESSAGE BOARD is over there. This is the side for people to vent, or in your case ramble on about your bussy. Have at it.

I live in a blue state as well and never saw Al Gore signs in 2000. There was no need for his campaign to expend any dollars or effort as it was a foregone conclusion. Is your state a foregone conclusion?

For sure. He’s a great guy. When he says something you can definitely take it to the bank! Keep on fluffing young man!

I haven’t seen that many posts from this tool. Ten bucks says most of what is here has come from you. You have an unusual twitter feed.

I couldn’t agree more that he is an awful candidate. You will never find me fluffing a jackass like him the way you got after Tim Walz helmet. Embarrassing for you.

Truly embarrassing but if you really want to see copium, avail yourself of Frankish and L Ron posts re: SNL decision to disregard their prior declaration of no candidates.

Effing FCC Commissioner has his head up his A!! This one really got to you, didn’t it?

He’s mentally fit.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/04/latinos-decide-election-pennsylvania-00186534 Here’s the article. Written by a guy that has the LA Times, NYT, The Atlantic, and The Guardian on his resume. See, Politico plays it straight for both sides! Another W for Frankish!

Only two riled up here. Frankish and…

You’ve put a lot of emotion into a simple question. More please!

The girlfriend-smacking nanny-banger getting it done on the campaign trail.

Are you feeling a little unwound? (I’M NOT UNWOUND, YOU’RE UNWOUND - I saved you the trouble). It was a simple question about SNL saying one thing a few weeks ago and doing the opposite at the last possible opportunity. it was hard typing that through all my tears. I’m crying so hard.

It really was a simple question. What do you think about SNL saying one thing and doing another as it relates to presidential candidate appearances? That’s really as far as I can dumb it down for you. That you have been boxing yourself over a simple question is weird. I haven’t mentioned any rule and have no interest in the rules/laws involved. “I am not a SNL producer”…that’s fantastic!

I’m not all that interested. Just asked if you had any. I see that you are unwilling to offer a “thought” on the propriety of the matter.