Jump to content

JDHillFan

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,589
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

4,804 profile views

JDHillFan's Achievements

All Pro

All Pro (7/8)

9.2k

Reputation

  1. You haven’t been around much since you posted these two gems a week apart. Likely one of the only smart decisions you’ve ever made. Did you fall off the wagon tonight?
  2. First the arch and now the stadium? OH NO!!
  3. I remember when you thought “swallow it whole” was a dick joke. You were upset then but look at you go now! Good for you!
  4. Oh my. So defensive! It’s ok to make a story about a Democrat hypocrite, one you called “a true Christian”, about TRUMP. Not sure what it gets you, but go for it. Talarico, “a true Christian” is likely just another politician douche. I like that you want to believe otherwise.
  5. Correct. Income up to 600k/yr for families. Sounds like a handout to the rich doesn’t it? Wonder why no democrats are railing against this.
  6. It could well be incorrect information that’s currently being spewed. The only two things that seem certain are that you are clueless about gait analysis (similar to when you pretended to know about Canadian Mennonite population centers) and you seem very invested in not wanting this case solved. Seems weird for someone as fiercely independent as you.
  7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3925574/ Sounded made up in 2014 when this was published back in the Obama era, didn’t it? I think there have been advances in technology since then that may have made it more of a thing. you DO NOT want this case solved, do you
  8. This video you were kind enough to share before it became private featured James Talarico. I believe he’s the one you refer to as “a true Christian”. Some you win, some you lose.
  9. Does the dems “ask” still include COVID-era subsidies for families making up to 600k/yr? If so, the dems “ask” amounts to one of those handouts to the rich you normally whine about. Now, because of party politics only, that’s totally reasonable from your point of view. Nice work. V/R, AM
  10. Why do you think it’s taking so long to solve this case? The sheer brilliance of the perp?
  11. What part sickens you? The legality of it? 🤦🏻🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♂️
  12. You use “anonymous” disparagingly. Ten bucks says your name is not Frank Reich or anything close to it.
×
×
  • Create New...