Mikie2times

I don't think he is better, he is different and I like his different. To me the CBS team wants to turn everything into some magical feel good story. I just don't like that style any more.

The Fox A team is much better than the CBS A team and they would also win in a fight

I like what Josh is doing the last half of the year. I think the offense has played poorly in some of these instances, but it's more of a contrarian style view to what the obvious reason is. More than anything, I just feel no hope with McD. When you post #1 or #2 defenses, play a team multiple times. I mean when can we enter a game vs KC or Cinci and ever be thinking it will be different? What could possibly make somebody feel that way at this point. I Hate our scheme. Any variation of the Tampa 2, fast, smaller, zone, can go bleepity bleep. It folds like a cheap deck against good teams.

I actually appreciated you making that point. I had forget how the Colts game actually fit into this sample. I also mistitled it as opposed to leaving teams out intentionally. I tried to capture how these teams that killed us did against other teams. So we could see EPA relative to us and them. In the case of most the other games those teams didn't play anybody else. So I kept the analysis on just the teams that booted us to keep it uniform. Not to mention, I don't care about the Patriots, Steelers, or Thompson led Dolphins. If you have eyes you know we don't struggle against those teams. Those are not the teams preventing us from getting further. So you look at the teams that are doing that. Not exactly rocket science.

That was no doubt a really bad call. I figure most the communication is about him going for it and well, that's just who he is. Nothing is changing it. It's also what the analytics say is the right move. So I guess I cut him more slack over those calls even if they wouldn't have been mine.

I mean, Campbell called the game the same way as he did all season. The analytics said go and that's what he did. I agree it wasn't a move I would make, but this idea of this being his 13 seconds is a bit silly. He was completely aware of what he was doing, would do it again, and especially in the case of the first one, would have converted pretty easily.

16-0

Wait...you didn't ask Santa for a 49ers vs Chiefs Super Bowl?

Downright sexy analogy.

NFL fixers got to Reynolds. He's at the heart of the entire conspiracy.

The Lions are playing like me after I'm down $100 and had 8 drinks

Yup. You take a two TD+ lead if presented.

Lake Erie for 3 of the 4

Lions are historically Billsy, lets see how this goes

It took us almost 80 plays to amass the same yardage total. KC has had the best offensive outputs of the Mahomes era vs us. We have never come close to stopping that offense. Not even a sniff. The Bengals have. Until we can put up even a fight on defense your post is just off base especially given the Bengals fairly dominating history against them and us for that matter. So if they don't fumble we don't lose by 10+?

Lamar is basically the McD of QB's, so I get it

361 yards and 7.7 yards per play, what exactly would you call that?

If the Ravens don't fumble on the goal line and if the Chiefs don't fumble on the goal line, the Ravens take it into OT and the Bills lose by 10+. Buffalo was completely dominated in the stat sheet by KC. The Bengals perform far better against us and KC. .

The scheme doesn't hold up against the better QB's. We basically don't play man defense. If we do we don't have the players to execute it at a high level. The Tampa style defense has a long history of folding in the playoffs. Glad we are married to it 👍

We are the only team that can hang with a team we never beat in the playoffs. I'm confused.

Bet this ages well

And I'm not doing this again, just having fun. Never have liked Lamar's game though.

Running QB's.......

No and the poster didn’t ask about the win / loss record. That’s pretty easy to find if he wanted it.

Comfortable decisions are so frequently the best aren't they?