Mikie2times

I promise, a 6”4 235 WR who runs a 4.6 will be available and Beane will make you forgot about all this

in

I think the two best teams were Baltimore and Philly. We beat Baltimore and probably shouldn’t. KC beat us and probably shouldn’t. In the end Philly was the best, so justice I suppose.

1000% and what is great culture worth if it doesn’t afford you that ability?

Sure, but TBH I think those assets need to go proven commodity. I just don’t think we can depend on the 30 something player in the draft making the type of impact we need him to have. Can it happen? Sure. But with where we are, you mortgage 1st round picks that are always late for us anyway. Beane has done fine in the later rounds. We need to target difference makers.

We really suffer from the curse of being just good enough in so many areas. The Eagles imploded last year. It forced the change that resulted in what you see today. I just don’t think this team will have large scale changes. As much as I want to see it something like that. Curse of being just good enough.

I mean, KC limped thru the regular season the beat a crap Houston team and probably should have lost to us for the second time. They have very few quality wins. The Eagles have been beating up good opponents all year and have “A” talent on both sides. They seemed to be better and no question that is the case. It doesn’t appear like the Super Bowl will change what you would think the outcome would be. I don’t know why it was so hard to see what I just said prior but it was there if you looked for it and didn’t expect the Chiefs to just win because they usually do.

I thought the Chiefs score on everybody. That’s what I’ve been told.

They don’t, Ravens or Bills were better.

Looking like the Bucs Super Bowl

Wild that these fringe calls are still going to KC with so much awareness over it

So Palestinian's and Jews have been fighting for this land for almost 80 years. It’s the most dangerous stretch of land in the world with religious differences and land ownership at the heart of the conflict. This is the Middle East, a place we were desperate to leave for so long. He is dumb enough and arrogant enough to think somehow he can navigate this. I hope this situation isn’t what is required to prove it to some.

This is largely where I'm at, but I will say, the idea of getting an ACTUAL game wrecker at DL is more appealing based on this. Which I believe you oppose. But I feel like it's more based on hitting on who that difference maker is vs the side of the ball they play. I'm squeamish we would be getting the max benefit of a WR1 which make me lean DL. But more than anything we just need a clear hit.

It's funny how sensitive people can be to just a basic question in how we view things. So you have some perspective..... Diggs had Brady as his OC for 7 regular season games he was active in. If you only look at games Diggs was active, he had 137 games in which a previous 7 game sample existed. This crosses seasons. It obviously wouldn't start until he has played in 7 games in his career. Out of those 137 instances, he had 1 where he averaged less yards than the 7 game sample with Brady. It happened the previous 7 games week 1 of 2016 (so the end of his rookie year). Cooper had Brady for 8 regular season games he was active for. If you look at games in which Cooper was active, he had 154 games in which a previous 8 game sample existed. Out of those 154 instances, he had 3 where he averaged less yards than the 8 game sample with Brady. All 3 happened concurrently his 3rd year with the Raiders. So when we say these questions aren't meaningful, I really don't understand how people can arrive at that. These are the options that explain the above: Both were so forgone/injured _____ that they just both happened to have near career low output in B2B years with us (in a very good offense which makes it even more weird). Brady can effectively scheme a #1 but it should or shouldn't matter to us because our offense is very successful Brady can't effectively scheme a #1 but it should or shouldn't matter to us because our offense is very successful In those three options, sure, it can be a blend. But only 1 option suggests spending on a #1 would amount to anything more than a decoy. Which might in fact be a very valuable thing to us but I don't imagine it would be enticing to a FA. Nor would it be an advantage that isn't eventually taken away if you don't in fact eventually use that weapon. It can only be a decoy for so long. As we ask ourselves what priority we place on FA's and the draft I think this question is probably among the most important to the offseason.

Trump will stabilize the Middle East with American occupancy

Diggs for his sample under Brady was his worst since joining Buffalo. Cooper just had one of his worst seasons as a pro. I think most people see these outcomes as two separate things and that very well could be the case. Diggs was a little banged up + drama and Cooper was also banged up. But I’m also not ignoring the common denominator of the two being Brady especially when I see people advocating for that #1 WR. Do you think these two WR’s suffered decreases independent of Brady or do think his scheme limited them? If the scheme limits #1’s do you still value a true #1 the same as you would in another scheme?

I’m more worried if the hit bothered him

Samuels, Shakir are. Kinkaid often plays out of it. Coleman was better at big slot at FSU. I would much rather be adding boundary weapons. We have a lot of mix and match options from the slot.

He's the type of guy you can get for a 5th. But yet another slot guy.

They also said he was lazy and out of shape all the time which isn't a stretch to consider

In a year let me know what causes you more pain, immigrants or tariffs

K buddy, how about all the bazillion American born citizens that commit crimes. You plan on stopping all them as well? I would imagine they make up about 100000000000% more of the crime in the US than those immigrants do. Not as sexy to create programs to reduce violence in America from Americans it appears.

Of course he won’t fix it. You can improve it if your measurement of improving it is in people coming and going void of costs, time, jobs and all the other variables that are involved in “fixing” it. You can’t stop it. We just don’t have the resources. My brother is an ICE officer. Sunday he got a called in with mandatory OT as did all ICE officers for the next 7 days. So let’s deport some people he says. Don’t know where to put them, no planes, jails but hey, let’s go full mandatory OT and do it anyway. Sounds like a good use of resources? Yes he likes Trump and that’s fine. At the end of the day people with crap lives are going to want to go to places that are nicer and nothing Trump does is going to stop them from trying. Whenever he’s done with his political career the next guys probably not going to waste the time, energy, and resources he has. Then all of his fixing will be rolled back in a few years because maybe somebody thinks the time, money, and resources could be spent better and would you blame them if that is the case? Do you expect to personally benefit from this massive effort to limit immigration? Did you violently hurt as a result of the immigrants that were let in?

It’s not something that will get fixed regardless if you do nothing or build a wall. All this is just symbolic so he can beat his chest. What will happen next week is him costing me money. In a real way. Not a symbolic one.

No hysteria, just frustration. Wrong assumption on my political beliefs. I hate the man which isn’t that hard to do regardless of how you lean politically. The lefts attitude of do nothing would be better than do the wrong things aggressively as we are seeing now. I’m not very supportive of destabilizing governments and economies, thanks.