Mikie2times

They have two times outs and will play for a fast field goal. So possible onside kick and one more first down needed. Lot of game left.

Wow. All Josh

Not like they’re the best run defense in football. Gotta go for this.

Again, we need to end this on offense

Must have it

The game is in Allen’s hands. I gave him a lot of ***** last year on the last drive. He has to know anything less than a TD and it’s over

Patriots are the only other team that did that every time

We contained them statistically on defense which is why those two TD drives are a bit frustrating. They have been very efficient with what production we have allowed

He’s athletic. You can see that. He seems faster than Shakir, not as twitchy, physical or agile, but explosive as was advertised. He even gets the bye next week to get more healthy, Cooper as well.

Samuel is coming alive the last two week

Is 3 minutes not enough?

Just abusing our heavy pursuit

Reid knows how to use our scheme against us

Draw for now

That catch was insane. Catching a ball over your head like that is about the hardest thing you can do as a WR

We should get the call, yes

It was moving a hair when the at foot was down. Very close.

That is so close, could go either way

Wow, that was what Steph didn’t do

This is where I disagree. The Patriots Dynasty as it happened would not of happened without Free Agency. It allowed them to reload the roster quickly where in the old days those players would eventually retire and backfilling solely by the draft would have been unlikely. As long as the QB stays the same the rest of the parts can change. The relationship between how big a role the coach plays and how big a role the QB plays is forever up for debate. Andy didn't do what he's doing until Mahomes came along. That was after a very long career. Same with Bill and it most certainly ended as soon as Brady left. We know these guys are great coaches, but they don't seem to hit this legendary status until they have the QB. So I think it's likely a bit more common than we would think. That QB is creating an environment that is fairly ideal for these HC's which allows them stability, tenure, growth. If they're good they become better as a result. I mean, maybe, but we are seeing something that hasn't occurred before. So you can either take on the perspective that it's random or you can take on the perspective that its not random. It's logical to me why this is occurring after a prolonged run by the Patriots. I expect it will keep occurring (extreme or prolonged dynasties). We will see over the coming years. Appreciate your post.

By all means, please tell me the team in NFL history who has been to 4 Super Bowls in 5 years and won 3 of them.

An yet it took all those teams a decade to accomplish what the Chiefs will in half the time

Again, I sort of butchered the post and it turned into more of the Bills dethroning the Chiefs. But the main point I was going for is I think in time we will come to find out the Patriots Dynasty is more common of in the current NFL. The league always has one QB who is a notch better. Perhaps it’s only in the biggest games and brightest moments. Brady and Mahomes have been those guys (as was Montana). Peyton was not. Allen has been great, but I wouldn’t say he is one of those guy yet (please for the love of god don’t make this thread about that statement). Point is, we know Brady and Mahomes have been. The performance they have deep in the playoffs stands by itself. Then you realize this league is beyond QB dependent. Way more so than even the 80’s or 90’s when RB’s still mattered. Then people said free agency will kill the dynasty, but it actually made it worse. Before everybody would get old and retire or lose talent and those teams would fade away. Now these teams are just reloading with it and as long as that QB still plays at a high level (which is way more likely now vs then because of the rules) the dynasty can keep going. Obviously all of this gets exacerbated by having a great GM and Coach, but the continuity of what I’m describing allows that to happen way more so than it normally would as most other teams are swapping out those roles every few years. It sort of creates this snowball effect. We have a lot of these elements going for us. Very similar. It what’s led to the best overall record this decade. But we haven’t been able to overcome this Dynasty and while we might break thru one year as Manning did and others, this Chiefs team has another 5+ years the way this has been going. So then you wonder, is this really a coincidence? The two longest running most successful dynasty’s in our sport will have occurred back to back, literally concurrent. Which then makes you think, is this really that uncommon anymore or is this a byproduct of the modern game? We will see…. Read the post I just put up

Chat GPT

I didn't do a good job with the post. I'm talking more about extended dynasties. The Steelers won 4 Super Bowls in 4 appearances The 49ers won 4 Super Bowls in 4 appearances The Cowboys won 3 Super Bowls in 3 appearance The Patriots won 6 Super Bowls in 9 appearances The Chiefs have won 3 Super Bowls in 4 appearances with no end in sight The Patriots and Chiefs look different to me. They have what is considered to be the best QB and it started very young for them. They have the support of a good coach. They have the support of a good roster that can have pieces subbed in and out much more easy than those older dynasties. If the QB has drive, who is slowing him down? You can't hit him. He's not even 30. So you end up building a roster for a decade around this person. Who plays the most impactful position in all of sports. What I'm saying is this is NOT rare anymore. Whenever the Chiefs run ends, which is likely 5+ years from now, another will start and it will take the mold of the Patriots and Chiefs, not the Steelers, 49ers, or Cowboys.