Mikie2times

Adams would have fit just fine in this system. He was lightning off the snap when he wanted to be. I also think he was let go more for attitude, age, and contract. It's just not about being big though, it's the type of DT. The type that isn't going to jump off the line, or have a high motor, but he will demand two defenders and make it hell running inside. Since just about everybody else is looking for this guy, and since Buffalo isn't. He's not just going to fall into our lap. Those are the guys that shut down running games, ala P. Williams.

I know that’s the point. I also know they won't restrict just based on a players weight. But by your own definition, which is in line with Cover 2 coaches, a player like Pat Williams wouldn't be a good fit. That's just crap, especially in running situations. Perhaps our biggest need this past draft was DT, that is before we switched to this defense. Ngata was on the board but clearly didn't fit this system. Regardless of how he turns out I hate the fact that we wouldn't even consider him at such a critical need.

Again my point. How can we be in any position to get this specific at DT right now? If a guy dominates the line of scrimmage, and is a little on the heavy side how can we say oh well he doesn't have a great first step. It's stupid to be so married to a system that it restricts yourself from getting good players in a scarce position, at a critical need.

He was by himself? This wasn't supposed to be a controlled flying session? I don't know I'm just asking. It's still poor judgment to fly in that area with limited experience. Did they say it was his decision to fly in that area? Regardless of these answers I choose not to mock the dead. It's got to be bad for karma.

And you have some bigger guys that can. Should we not consider them because they don't fit in with the cover 2. I like systems, I just don't like being married to them. Dick proposed to the cover 2 a long time ago.

The point wasn't to debate about Simon as a run stuffer. Regardless if he is or is not (I assumed perhaps wrongly that he is) Jauron has continued to say we like fast/quick DT's. That is the polar opposite of what most good run stuffing teams seems to have at least one of. I'm saying that only so many Tommie Harris or Sapp like DT's exist in this league. That our defense philosophy should not completely restrict us from certain players. Players like Ngata or Adams, or whoever is better then who we have. From this post I imagine my biggest argument will be about Adams, so before that comes just imagine he did want to play for Buffalo. Regardless if it’s true or not, Jauron stated he wasn’t a good “Fit” for our system.

Would people mock the 4 people in the car crash? No. The only reason Cory Lidle is being mocked is because he's better then 99% of the baseball players in this world. Just not that 1%.

We heard Jauron say all off-season how we will stop the run with speed and penetration. Obviously we need some speed at DT for this system, but what’s more important, speed or stopping the run? By excluding DT's that aren't quick were really limiting ourselves to who we can go after. This is already a system known for being soft in the interior. We need to at least be open to signing a wide body that can sure up the middle. I'm not talking about Ryan Pickett, who we did target last season. I'm talking about a true run stopping DT. The Colts were willing to go after Simon despite being in the same system. It hasn't worked out great for them, but that could be just as much on Simon then Simon not fitting the system. DT's are hard enough to come buy and if we only target smaller penetrating DT's it will be a long time before we sure up the run defense.

Do they even know what caused the crash? I saw somebody mention fuel.

One poster said humor is how some deal with tragedy. Problem is nobody who's joking is using it in the context of grieving. It's just classless cheap shots.

You got to be kidding me. Your fine in Detroit as long as you’re by a major venue. IE Comerica, Ford Field, Fox Theatre. Obviously you don't want to go to far outside that area, but that area is more then safe, especially when a game is going on. The most that will happen is people asking for change, so expect that. I still wouldn't recommend tailgating only because the scene sucks. I'll let you know what bar I'll be at if you want to pregame. Hockeytown is fun, but VERY expensive. I probably won't be going there. I do agree that Windsor is very fun, clean, and safe. Let me also suggest getting a map. As I said you don't want to venture to far out of that area. Detroit roads are all in a circular pattern so you can literally go round and round for hours. If you end up getting spit out on the wrong street just make sure your not going East.

That was awsome. I'm convinced if your speaking to Theisman any conversation, no matter what the topic, will somehow relate back to Thesiman.

I got tickets, was thinking of going to a bar at Ford Field a few hours before kickoff. You going?

What RB is going to do anything if he's gang tackled behind the line of scrimmage? He was hit as he got the handoff several times last night. It was his worst game of the year, by a wide margin, and he still goes for 150. He has a MAC line, and put up over 150 yards against the number one team in the country. Same thing at Michigan last season. That's the point. He's done this against the best in college football, despite having the disadvantages of being on a MAC team. If his disadvantages are viewed as strongly as you view them then we could get him even later.

I like MAC football. Far be it for me to criticize your take on his performance. It's based on one game. If you hit him behind the line LOS he can be slowed down. That was the case about half the time last night.

I place a lot of bets. I've never had a single problem with www.pinnaclesports.com Some of the others people have mentioned aren't bad, but Pinnacle always has the smallest juice and payout times.

1) He's not top 5 but he's probably top 10, and certainly top 15. Your spoiled if thats how you view Willis. 2) Evans is at week 5 starting as a one. He's flirting with 100 yards on a weekly basis. How can you be so sure about him being just a 2 after being more productive then Moulds at the same point in his career? 3) See 2, I agree with the rest being 3's. 4) Agree. We will know about him by the end of the year. Let’s see how he comes out Sunday. 5) Agree. Seems like every year we have just enough talent for the Front office to justify only signing a LG. Gandy will be a FA, Villerial could retire, and Reyes and Flower could be viewed as stop gap players. It's ok to keep a few but we could be in position for an obvious line makeover if some of these guys go. We have the money, lets do it right this time.

Some like Terrell Davis, do more. Wolfe would be a perfect fit in that system. He might eventually wear down, but that’s what they say about a lot of small backs. He plays with a huge heart, and nobody gets a clean shot on him. For us he would be a great contrast to Willis, who lacks the ideal explosiveness you want in a 3rd down back. The JJ Arrington comparison is weak at best. Name me any back who's had success running in Arizona, and that includes Edge. AZ is a career killer for a lot of RB's.

I'll just let this go. Some good debate but things have got way to confusing.

Watch him go to Denver and rush for 1500 yards. By the way, the last player who dominated the MAC to this level was Randy Moss. Wolfe is more dominant then he was so far.

I just love watching this guy play. The guy disappears, and then shows uncanny acceleration and agility. His top end gear is not the best trait he has, but it's still more then enough to break the big gainers with that type of acceleration. No doubt the line needs to be addressed but I just love the versatility he would give us. It would be a hell dealing with so much quickness on the field. Plus he's known as a character guy, the type Marv likes. I'm not saying get rid of Willis, just compliment him. Give us the dimension so many other teams have.

I bet he posts a sub 4.45, which is damn good for a RB at the combine.

I don't expect many on this board to take the Lions seriously, after all this is a team that's been worse then Buffalo the last few years and is 0-5. The Lions however are a very real threat to us. The oddsmakers opened them as a 1 point home favorite. They will win some games this year, and had close games in 4 of 5 they played. That included the last two on the road. Traditionally this is a very weak road team that plays .500 or better at home. Being winless makes them more dangerous. In the scheme of things the Bills are the better team, but in this situation this game isn't more then a 50/50 proposition.

Thats a matter of opinion. Mine is Oline play is effected by how well you throw the ball. Every play doesn't end up in pressure or a sack. QB's with piss poor lines will have chances to make plays. The more they do it, the less pressure the offensive line receives. The less apt a defensive cordinator is to blitz. How else can you explain New England going threw 4 starting lineman last year, yet still getting solid protection. It's a balence, but QB performance still plays a big role.

It's a nice thought. I just don't have any confidence the Bills will do it seeing how we've said that for a decade. Wolfe would be the next best thing.