Mikie2times

I think people changing sides, or turning out when they wouldn't before will make a difference. In a year with strong Republican support it wouldn’t, but they need every last bit of help right now.

The Bill was brought up and rejected on two other occasions. Jon Kyl was the one who introduced it in the first place, and continued to push it for 3 years. Without him this is a dead issue. He was backed by Vegas, which the online gaming community can accept because online gaming is clearly not in their interests. The main backer of Kyl was the Christian fundamentalist groups. If you disagree with my opinion my question is who will come out and vote, or change sides toward Republican because of this bill? Now think of the opposite for Democrats. Before you do that ask yourself when is the last time the government introduced a bill that took away a hobby for more then 20 million people?

Americans spent 8.5 billion gambling online in 2004. Over 20 million people gamble online. The demographics of those people are mostly under the age of 40. Democrats tend to be younger then Republicans. I may be reading too much into it, but it's not exactly like the Republicans have a lot of room to lose more votes right now.

That articles dead on. You can't ban this industry. Also, and not get to OT, but the Republicans made a big mistake with this one. I have no data to support this, but I would think online poker and sports betters are more democratic then republican. They just lit a fire under these people to actually show up and vote. Then you have other Republicans who are really pissed off about this, and could turn because of it. To make it worse they're selling this as an online ban, which the majority of the population believes. In reality this legislation is only meant to make transferring funds more difficult. Online gambling still remains legal at the federal level. Now if they amend the Wire act then you should get worried.

You make some points, and I do think we need to lighten up somewhat. But I can't agree with your assessment of what areas are good and bad. Right now if the QB is ok, then our WR's can't be good, visa versa. This isn't a good passing game right now, and JP has been afforded enough clean throws this year to not blame it entirely on the offensive line. The TE's have been flat out non existent; Buffalo's production is among the worst in the NFL at that position. The secondary is nowhere near being among the best in the league. The numbers show that. Maybe a more accurate statement would be Buffalo's secondary has the POTENTIAL to be among the best in the league. Even then NC might not be around, and TM needs to get his game together fast. The LB's are good, TKO needs to recover, London Fletcher is still a great player but will only regress at this point in his career. If the DL is average ask yourself why New England ran the Ball 35 times around 4pm on Sunday.

I guess it's a neat study. I just don't see it serving any practical purpose. You can't quantify fan loyalty, and that’s coming from somebody who tries to quantify a lot of unquantifiable concepts.

I honestly think he watched Antoine for to long. Winfield is arguably the most efficient pound for pound tackler of all time. It's just that his style can lead to a ton of missed tackles if the technique isn't flawless. Nate tries to ankle tackle everybody with his face mask pointing at the ground.

I just want to see Jauron get a fair shake. For no other reason then us needing consistency. Very little separates playoff teams and non playoff teams. When you constantly change key elements of your team a lack of continuity will kill any gain in improvement for the short term. But before we even reach the potential gains for the long term the mobs ready to change it up again. Right now, even die hards must be willing to accept rebuilding. It doesn't mean you accept defeat, just that you agree to not turn on players/coaches/GM's until they have time. I hope people will keep this in mind while looking at the rest of the year.

How did you get that from what I said? I'm saying this has what we've done. It's failed. Let's stay patient with Jauron.

Very funny

It was Patten BuffOrange 1 KzooMike 0

I swear it was Brady....but when I play this game with my girlfriend I usually lose.

It was Brady. Clements killed Brady knocking him unconscious near the sideline. Part of his unconscious body laid out of bounds and the fumbled ball was in play touching the rest of his body (in play). The Bills recovered the fumble. The ruling was the ball was dead because it was touching a player who was out of bounds.

I hope not, no need to bash two good players. If it leads to some comparisons I wouldn't mind though. Fumbling aside, they're almost identical statistically in the time they spent here. That might surprise some. Henry clearly had a fumbling issue early in his career. If he works that out, I think the guy who ends up being the most mature player will have the best career.

Travis left on bad terms. His poor judgment in his personal life led to harsh criticism, and he didn't come out looking great when McGahee transitioned. He was immature, but for most his career he played with all heart for Buffalo. He's blown up the last two weeks for Tennessee, and I just wanted to give him props. Maybe see how others look back on him after some times past.

You expect the head coach of a football team to tell his players or the media that this is a rebuilding year? That you should just expect to lose 10 games and not get upset with it? We can commit to the concept of winning, and stay realistic with what we expect from a head coach. As Bills fans we have the attitude of fire and replace for every aspect of this team. We've been firing and replacing for over a decade in every aspect of the organization. Maybe it's possible that all this change compounds the effects of a bad roster into a decade long playoff drought.

Same thing that's been happening since Wade Phillips got canned. Most the time a New coach + New system = Rebuilding. The great start altered Jaurons expectation level way past reality for this team. You don't need to be Nostradamus to see people turn on him if this thing doesn't turn around soon.

At the start of the year the perception of most our fans was that of a rebuilding year. That was until we played with the Patriots in week 1, beat Miami in week 2, nearly beat the Jets, and then beat Minnesota. Now all of sudden the perceptions of many changed from rebuilding to contending. The problem is this team never changed with it. This was still the same team with the flaws most identified before the season started. It will only be a matter of time before people point fingers at Jauron. Once the blame shifts to him we start this process all over again. This team will only get better with time, and as fans we control the clock. Stay patient. Stay rational. Stay the course.

The Lions game

They read KzooMike's posts Kidding aside it probably has more to do with McFarland coming from the Cover 2. I don't expect us to change the approach much.

It was Morris. He was decent, fumbling problem if memory serves me right. I think he cost us a game in Miami.

I call it the stealth TE game plan

Jason Witten is a good example of this right now

Tell me about it. He looks good but lets see how he plays on the road.

Champ Bailey, Clinton Portis, Randy Moss etc...Do they all suck just because they got traded? MacFarland has been a part of one of the better cover 2 run stopping teams in the league for several years. Clements is gone at the end of the year. Whats not to like?