Meatloaf63

Because Einstein if the Qb didn’t fumble the Ravens likely win. It’s not up for discussion, it’s a fact. Exactly …

Yet they should have lost to the Ravens….

Your team is dirty and you draft low quality people. Get over it, and when you lose whether it’s next week or the Super Bowl come back so we can laugh at you. It doesn’t matter that you may have gone further, you are not winning it all. It took a well timed fumble for you to beat the Ravens.

Good question. If McDermott is a good coach he will see the issues and accept change.

Because it’s a results driven business.

There were games we were able to run, but you are probably right, we don’t commit to truly establishing the run. So knowing that would we have changed our philosophy for one player? Who knows???

He wouldn’t look half as good running behind our line or the crappy running blocking schemes we employ…

One play, getting lucky on one play is not an offensive strategy. Throwing the ball long on third and two to the player who has the most drops is not a recipe for success. What do the analytics say? Which play has a better chance of success? Beasly underneath used to be almost automatic, that part of the game is gone and it’s a big reason we have been struggling. But keep dreaming the long ball will get us to the superbowl 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Not much different, the oline is the issue, those players would help but not guarantee success.

Keep thinking that’s a recipe for success. It failed us last week but we skated by, today it cost us. Keep the loser mentality 👍 look at success rates, your plan is terrible and was proven so today.

Control the hero ball, third and two in your own end you don’t lob 30 yard passes in a snow storm. You get the first down. You all said no problem last week we scored over 30 points. Well this week exposed the flaw in your thinking. It’s a combination of play design and hero ball mixed with a pathetic o line. Recipe for play of disaster.

Lol Joe Burrow had all the time in the world. Cold blooded assassins don’t lose the Super Bowl to an average LA team, hell he should have lost to the Ravens last week. How about we swap defenses, who wins today?

That’s where we are headed, wasting Josh and Diggs, if there are no changes it’s over. This ain’t working and it’s not going to change I’m afraid.

Nothing going to happen, nothing going to change…

That is part of the problem, Dorsey can’t control him, and the play design is just terrible.

They won’t change a thing, and nothing will change

And what’s up with that? Dorsey is in over his head and it shows…

These clowns will come out of the woodwork now.

Only call was a false start. It’s a clown show out there

No running wide in the snow killed the opportunity

Lol no he didn’t

He has time and open receivers, not the same…

It is an interesting change for sure.

No, that was one option, and one should always be stretching the field. But a heavy blitz dictates that the other routes should be short to medium with an outlet receiver. The long route means blocks have to hold up against the blitz and obviously they consistently were not, as evidenced when you give up 7 sacks. One of which resulted in 7 pts for the opponent. The phins never stopped blitzing because the didn’t have too, we never consistently made them pay. Whether that’s on Dorsey and play design or Allen’s lack of execution we will have to watch the all 22 to have a better understanding. Yes we scored 34 pts and yes we win, but this should not have been in doubt till the last 2 minutes…

If there was, I didn’t see it. Head on showed possession was never lost and ball did not move. But hey, maybe I missed something. Remember it was called a TD, evidence has to be indisputable, If it takes that long to nitpick a called TD, no way should it be overturned.