Backintheday544

Why do minorities have fewer IDs? Because a lot of minorities don’t have much use for them. The most common voter ID is a driver’s license, and minorities are less likely to drive. A 2007 study found that in California, New Mexico, and Washington, whites were more likely to have driver’s licenses than nonwhites. In Orange County, Calif., about 92 percent of white voters had driver’s licenses, compared with only 84 percent of Latino voters and 81 percent of “other” voters. A 2005 study of Wisconsin similarly found that while about 80 percent of white residents had licenses, only about half of African-American and Hispanic residents had licenses. Quick one there. Republicans can’t make laws directly discriminatory but they can make laws that target minorities. For example, look at the NC gerrymandering case. They didn’t say hey we’re trying to to discriminate against people of color. Instead they used stats to gerrymander districts to disenfranchise black voters while helping Republican white voters.

Which proposed legislation are you talking about? Don’t believe there are any major Biden proposed COVID bills like CARES Act. The reconciliation bills are infrastructure bills and not related to COVID. Care to share what bloated COVID spending bills you’re referring to?

You need to change your name to the Fonz because you completely jumped the shark there. One has statistics to show it disproportionally affects one race over another. The other is well this, which is just terrible.

Yea the one that was totally politically motivated, saw less deaths than the insurrection, and cost a ton of money over several years.

Republicans think it’s cool to sell Star of David thinking they’re in a Holocaust. Capitalism pressures the companies suppliers: https://www.newschannel5.com/news/hatwrks-apologizes-for-instagram-post-brands-start-dropping-products-from-hatwrks

Two and a half years, $7.8 million for Benghazi. Benghazi had less deaths than the insurrection. Benghazi was also acknowledged to be politically motivated by Republicans. Here’s a quote from a NY Republican: “This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton,” said Hanna, who is not a member of the committee. “After what Kevin McCarthy said, it’s difficult to accept at least a part of it was not. I think that’s the way Washington works. But you’d like to expect more from a committee that’s spent millions of dollars and tons of time.” Did you say the legislative branch was doing their job investigating the executive when looking at Trumps tax records?

wanted to add: I don't think that I have ever called anyone a "bot” here, but you come pretty close.

We know trump said “I like people who weren’t captured” we know trump had an issue with gold star families with the Khans. Those are both undeniable facts. This: While President Trump was in office he had the overwhelming support of servicemen and women. Is an opinion.

As I pointed out, in the Whitney thread you said one thing, in the other thread you said the complete opposite. Sorry, my bad, you didn’t say, you posted links to conservative webpages that provided countering views. As you said, you rarely have an opinion when positing here. All you do is Post right wing articles. You don’t give a thought if they are counter to other things you post, you just post them. let’s break it down to the prima facile case: use of a messaging system - check sending multiple unsolicited messages - check, you post random sites all the time for the purpose of commercial advertising - maybe? You post ransom sites to drive people to go tho that have countering opinions to each other for the purposes of proselytizing - well yea you do. You just post right bs mainly for proselytizing. You even said you don’t care about what’s being said you just want to spread the word of the right while trying to drive traffic to such sites. You already said you’re an NPC on this board as you don’t do anything but spam the board with right wing click bait.

So you’re just spamming the board. Per the board rules spamming isn’t allowed.

Happy Memorial Day! But just to the people who weren’t captured because the Trump cult doesn’t like those that were: “I like people who weren’t captured.” Oh and not to Gold Star families either because you know the whole Khan saga.

Can I ask you, do you read the things you just copy and paste or do you just say hey this is from some right wing thing I like and fits the topic? In your Matt Gaetz thread when he wanted to shoot up social media people you said, we wait you didn’t say because you rarely have an opinion but you copy and pasted: Kinzinger was hardly alone in asserting that Gaetz’s horrendous remarks aren’t protected by the First Amendment, though they almost certainly are. The Supreme Court has ruled that advocating violence is constitutionally protected speech, unless said speech is likely to cause “imminent lawless action.” That would be a very difficult standard to meet in this case. So please with your own words for once describe how they’re different?

Is anyone really surprised a Republican was a sexual predator? At least our right wing schills on the board are reporting it and saying it’s bad. Now if we can just get them to hop over to the Gaetz thread....

It’s crazy the deflection here. OP Trump org facing grand jury Cultist responses in order: 1. What about Bannon who had charges dismissed (while ignoring the fact they were dismissed due to a Trump pardon) 2. Middle finger meme that adds nothing to the discussion 3. attack on the poster 4. attack on the poster 5. whataboutism with Portland, nothing to do with the OP I guess the great thing we can pull from this is the cult isn’t defending Trump anymore. They’re just trying to deflect and if they don’t acknowledge it, it’s just not there.

I mean he was incompetent in being a president shouldn’t we expect him to be incompetent in doing a coup? He did get his ass kicked a ton in court about it

1) they’re not announcing a criminal investigation is a major thing. People go to jail. People do hard time as they should because they commit criminal acts. 2) sham impeachment - laughable. Name another impeachment that had as much cross party support as trumps first or second impeachment. 3) 5 people were killed that day. More than Benghazi The little people are just dumb asses. We saw it here. They thought they were the silent majority. They weren’t silent and you’re not the majority. Then they were lied to that vote was stolen. It wasn’t. In 2016 did you see Dems storm the Capitol looking to go after the VP and other high ranking Republicans? No because they were not looking to over throw the government. In the end these people tried to overtake a building with several lines of US political succession while having things like nooses outside the building, zip ties on them, etc.

More than 400 people charged in more than 40 states. More people dead than in Benghazi. You can say there is no serious charge but maybe say that to the over 400 people that are going to be waking up in a prison in the near future. Yes, with over 400 people you need to toss in jail, you plead down for the low level drones. Get quotes like hey we did this on Trumps orders. You do a commission to go after the high level circus leaders.

You still didn’t answer

You just used a lot of words and said nothing.

Sometimes you go for the easy conviction to get the person off the streets. Trumps words that did hours before the insurrection: 'If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore' We are going to the Capitol' Et all. You can read the transcript for yourself. We had a live talk about the speech here on this board. I said while Trump was speaking he’s going to get someone killed on this board. Unfortunately I was right. Unfortunately, I was wrong and it wasn’t one person it was many. id glad you are ignoring finally how dumb your whataboutism argument is. I’ll take that as personal growth from you.

You can have an insurrection without a clear cut leader. Who was the leader when the Bastille was stormed? And we do have a ring leader, the guy who brought all the people together and said he would storm the Capitol with them. Past presidents have an untouchableness to them. Republicans trying to get Obama for something would have political consequences. you’re in the other thread so you do know Trump is under criminal investigation right now and even that has political ramifications.

We’re still waiting for Trumps health care plan

DOJ and FBI have been arresting people like crazy for trying to over throw the government. What about the people that helped them that could be politically untouchable or harder to get to for those agencies? Yes Congress should. Congress has an investigatory function let them use it. Let the Dems use that power just like the Republicans used it for Benghazi. Let all the dirty laundry for these Republicans that aided and abetted such a National travesty to hang bare. Nothing to substantiate the claims! Hundreds of arrests have been made. Hundreds of stupid Trumptards are going to jail. You said why don’t you ask the people there. They did ask the people there and those people said they felt they were directed by Trump. Trump literally said he would march with them to Congress (he didn’t because he only cares about himself and was willing to risk his followers over himself).

You stated you don’t care about the insurrection. Maybe you do care if you’re posting here with this idiotic spew? From the Trump v Vance post: “I don’t care about 1/6.” Why you posting in a thread about the insurrection if you don’t care? We’re you lying them or now? Or just say the phrase “I, SCBills am a hypocrite”

They did ask them. The prior poster posted what they said, that they did it under Trumps orders. You laughed it off. So do you want the people who entered the capitol to answer or no?