Backintheday544

Your copium is running high today. yea that undecided voter is the 1 who decided to vote Trump in the video I posted. If you watch the video…. Every one else said they’re voting for Harris that’s voting. This again just shows you only care about your narrative. This is why people like you think elections were stolen. 8 undecided voters. 6 are now voting Harris. 1 is now voting Trump. 1 is not voting. And all you can do is latch on to the 1 because ignoring the 6(!) going Harris doesn’t fit into your minds narrative. Good luck in November.

CNNs undecided going for Kamala with 1 Trump and 1 not voting

Great protest outside the DNC. Hopefully he will be prosecuted for his crimes. All these students speaking out for his derelict of duty to protect our youth.

It's hilarious that a conservative SCOTUS doesn't agree with any of this BS that's been on here about the case. Anyone using the AZ form going forward needs to show proof of citizenship. That allows them to vote in AZ and Fed elections. Anyone using the Federal form needs to sign acknowledging they are a citizen. That allows them to vote in AZ Federal election but not AZ local elections. Great win here for Federal voting rights. It's a shame Republicans are trying to undercut the National Voting Rights Act.

LOL read: AZ can't block the people from voting in Nov.

Should Baron’s proclivity towards being a future serial killer be on the table? I think so. - Trump cheated on his wife with a porn star while Baron was in the womb - Republicans call themselves the party of family values - It appears Trumps neglect of his son since birth may have led his son do kill small animals, and assault people I feel a person couldn’t morally vote for such a man.

That just says Trump didn’t write Project 2025. Which is true. I can’t see him really writing anything. But it was still written by his staff. His VP still wrote for it. And in his last administration, he passed way more than half of Heritages proposed policies. So I rate this tweet as false and misleading. The video does not say what the tweet wants to confirm.

Alright, so don’t read the post and let members who feel it’s ok to disparage Walz kids to read it. Easy enough.

Have you seen all the righties post on Walz daughter here? Look at those first.

Republicans are going to need to spend money on TX. Too bad they can’t fund raise like Kamala. She’s really made the Rs need to go on defense. Add in the school board elections in FL where only 6 of 23 DeSantis backed people won….. hmmm

That random Maine district may be important for its 1 vote. Love this poll:

Except, we haven't really haven't seen the so called Millionaire flight when studied on the state to state level. if these millionaires cannot be bothered to flee a state, I doubt they'll be bothered to give up their US citizenship just to avoid this tax. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/do-higher-taxes-really-drive-millionaires-to-flee/ "The most striking finding of this research is how little elites seem willing to move to exploit tax advantages across state lines in the United States," they wrote in the study, published Thursday in the June issue of the American Sociological Review. But Young's research -- which examined the tax records of every U.S. millionaire over more than a decade, some 3.7 million filers -- makes clear just how rarely millionaires in the U.S. actually move, whether to take advantage of lower taxes or for any other reason. Of the roughly 500,000 households per year that report at least $1 million in income on their tax returns, only 2.4 percent, or 12,000 millionaires, migrate to another state; that compares with 2.9 percent for the population at large. Of the top income earners who do leave a state, only a sliver -- just over 2 percent -- seem to be spurred by a wish to cut their taxes, according to the study. What should we make of such findings? First, the specter of millionaire tax flight is largely a myth. That suggests state policymakers have little to fear in raising taxes on the wealthiest Americans as one way to close budget gaps and reduce inequality.

You do know 1862 is before 1913? per your link taxes applied at $3,000 today. That would be $95,000. Still not rich.

The first income tax started on people making more than $600 in 1862. $600 in 1862 is around $19,000 today. So if you think $19,000 is rich, wow.

Because if you’re a US resident you’re still taxed in the US. You can give up your US citizenship and pay an exit tax on your unrealized gains. Amd if they’re ex-Americans, they can pay the exit tax on unrealized gains and then lose the privledge of being a US citizen.

So they would just let their money chill in a savings account with the interest getting taxed at 39ish percent? If the ROI on the investments for the 10,000 people this would affect, is greater than the ROI elsewhere, they’ll still invest.

Per AI: As of February 2023, a study by Henley Partners found that 9,630 Americans have a net worth of over $100 million, which is considered centi-millionaire status. So this tax would affect less than 10,000 Americans.

If your net assets are over $100,000,000 and assuming there’s no exemption for primary residence in the tax bill.

Im a tax attorney with ex-pat clients. Trust me, the US taxes worldwide income of US citizens. There are somethings to avoid double taxation such as the foreign earned income exclusion and foreign tax credit, but they still tax world wide income. Corporate tax is similar depending on a couple nuances. Like a foreign owned entity treated as a disregarded entity will get the foreign earned income taxed in the US. If the sub is a Corp, then you’ll have GILTI come in play. But please do tell me why that’s wrong.

There’s no current bill. The idea was put in the 2025 budget by the Biden Admin but the policies mimic this bill. From the $100 million net worth to the 25 percent tax, so you can see how they would possibly define things like non-tradable assets (like a house). here’s Biden proposing the same thing in 2022, which is what this bill was drafted on; https://taxfoundation.org/blog/biden-billionaire-tax-unrealized-capital-gains/

To throw this out there to stop speculation. This is the bill the idea is based on: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8558#:~:text=This bill imposes a minimum,gains for the taxable year. This bill imposes a minimum tax on individual taxpayers whose net worth for the taxable year exceeds $100 million. The tax is equal to 20% of the sum of a taxpayer's taxable income, plus net unrealized gains for the taxable year. The tax may not exceed 40% of the amount by which the taxpayer's net worth exceeds $100 million Full bill here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8558/text#toc-H922BF7C44E41471A87A50FF6638398F4

The dumbass Republican store called and they’re running out of you.

So we invest more in the IRS to stop tax fraud. If the answer to you figuring a way around it is tax fraud then you’re grasping at straws. Not to mention it’s hard to avoid overseas reporting now with FATCA. And do you really think the majority of the Uber rich will risk jail time just to save some tax?